Lateral versus medial approach for total knee arthroplasty for valgus knee deformity shows comparable functional outcomes, hip-knee-ankle angle values, and complication rates: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Hip–knee–ankle angle Knee society score Lateral approach Medial approach Total knee arthroplasty Valgus knee deformity

Journal

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 23 06 2023
accepted: 25 09 2023
medline: 21 10 2023
pubmed: 21 10 2023
entrez: 21 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this meta-analysis of comparative studies was to update the current evidence on functional and radiographic outcomes and complications between medial and lateral approaches for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for valgus knee deformity. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central databases were used to search keywords and a total of ten studies were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Data extracted for quantitative analysis included the Knee Society score (KSS), range of motion (ROM), surgical time, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and number and types of complications. Random- and fixed-effect models were used for the meta-analysis of pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs). The Mantel-Haenszel method was adopted. A total of 1008 patients were identified, of whom 689 and 319 underwent TKA for valgus knee deformity with lateral and medial approach, respectively. The mean age was 70 ± 9.5 and 67.3 ± 9.6 years for the lateral and medial approaches, respectively. The mean follow-up was 37.8 ± 21.9 and 45.9 ± 26.7 months for the lateral and medial approach groups, respectively. Significantly higher functional outcomes were found for the medial approach, as measured by the postoperative KSS (MD = 1.8, 95% CI [0.48, 3.12], P = 0.007) and flexion ROM (MD = 3.12, 95% CI [0.45, 5.79], P = 0.02). However, both of these differences were lower than the minimal clinically important difference. Comparable surgical time and postoperative HKA angle values (MD = 0.22, 95% CI [- 0.30, 0.75], P = 0.40) between the two surgical approaches were found. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infections, fractures, transient peroneal nerve injuries, and deep vein thrombosis was comparable. This meta-analysis of comparative studies showed that when lateral and medial approaches are used for total knee arthroplasty for valgus knee deformity, comparable functional outcomes in terms of the KSS and ROM, surgical time, and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle values can be expected. Similar rates of periprosthetic joint infection, fracture, and peroneal nerve injury were also found. I. CRD42023392807.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37864590
doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05088-2
pii: 10.1007/s00402-023-05088-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Apostolopoulos AP, Nikolopoulos DD, Polyzois I et al (2010) Total knee arthroplasty in severe valgus deformity: Interest of combining a lateral approach with a tibial tubercle osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:777–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.008
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.008 pubmed: 20934399
Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS, Elkus M et al (2005) Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. JBJS 87:14
Tan MWP, Ng SWL, Chen JY et al (2021) Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life at minimum 10-year follow-up after fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 36:1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.049
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.049 pubmed: 33243585
Alesi D, Meena A, Fratini S et al (2022) Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee deformity: is it still a challenge in 2021? Musculoskelet Surg 106:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-021-00695-x
doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00695-x pubmed: 33587251
Schiapparelli F-F, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT (2018) Medial parapatellar approach leads to internal rotation of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1564–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4586-7
doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4586-7 pubmed: 28560546
Karachalios T, Sarangi PP, Hewman JH (1994) Severe varus and valgus deformities treated by total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 76:938–942
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.76B6.7983123
Keblish P (1991) The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 271:52–62
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199110000-00008
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928–d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928 pubmed: 22008217 pmcid: 3196245
Greenberg A, Kandel L, Liebergall M, Mattan Y, Rivkin G (2020) Total knee arthroplasty for valgus deformity via a lateral approach: clinical results, comparison to medial approach, and review of recent literature. J Arthroplast 35:2076–2083
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.037
Kornilov N, Kulyaba T, PetuKhov A et al (2015) Computer navigation helps achieving appropriate gap balancing and restoration of alignment in total knee arthroplasty for fixed valgus knee osteoarthritis irrespective of the surgical approach. Acta Orthop 81:673–681
Gunst S, Villa V, Magnussen R et al (2016) Equivalent results of medial and lateral parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty in mild valgus deformities. Int Orthop 40:945–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2893-5
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2893-5 pubmed: 26156728
Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Hakozaki A et al (2011) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty through a lateral approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:973–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1323-x
doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1323-x pubmed: 21085929
Sekiya H, Takatoku K, Takada H et al (2014) Lateral approach is advantageous in total knee arthroplasty for valgus deformed knee. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1137-2
doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1137-2 pubmed: 23412262
Nikolopoulos DD, Polyzois I, Apostolopoulos AP et al (2011) Total knee arthroplasty in severe valgus knee deformity: comparison of a standard medial parapatellar approach combined with tibial tubercle osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1834–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1474-4
doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1474-4 pubmed: 21484391
Tonelli Filho JR, Passarelli MC, Brito JAS et al (2016) Keblish’s lateral surgical approach enhances patellar tilt in valgus knee arthroplasty. Rev Bras Ortop Engl Ed 51:680–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.10.010
doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.10.010
Dudek P, Marczak D, Okoń T et al (2022) Lateral or medial parapatellar surgical approach to the valgus osteoarthritic knee? A retrospective single-center study. J Clin Med 11:5953. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195953
doi: 10.3390/jcm11195953 pubmed: 36233820 pmcid: 9572376
Guo C-J, Liu J, Niu D-S et al (2018) Clinical application of different operative approach of total knee replacement in knee valgus patients. Retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 49:80–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.008 pubmed: 29247814
Rawal J, Devany AJ, Jeffery JA (2015) Arthroplasty in the valgus knee: comparison and discussion of lateral vs medial parapatellar approaches and implant selection. Open Orthop J 9:94–97. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010094
doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010094 pubmed: 26157523 pmcid: 4483534
Wang B, Xing D, Li JJ et al (2019) Lateral or medial approach for valgus knee in total knee arthroplasty—which one is better? A systematic review. J Int Med Res 47:5400–5413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519882208
doi: 10.1177/0300060519882208 pubmed: 31642382 pmcid: 6862885
Xu G, Fu X, Tian P et al (2020) The lateral and medial approach in total arthroplasty for valgus knee: a meta-analysis of current literature. J Comp Eff Res 9:35–44. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2019-0111
doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0111 pubmed: 31777265
Langen S, Gaber S, Zdravkovic V et al (2016) Lateral subvastus approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy for primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcome and complications compared to medial parapatellar approach. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1718-y
doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1718-y pubmed: 26567166
Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gonzalez-Parreño S, Martinez-Mendez D et al (2020) Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1473–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05543-x
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05543-x pubmed: 31111184
Leopold SS, Porcher R (2017) Editorial: The minimum clinically important difference—the least we can do. Clin Orthop 475:929–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5253-5
doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5253-5 pubmed: 28124297 pmcid: 5339159
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH (2017) Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev 6:245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y pubmed: 29208034 pmcid: 5718002

Auteurs

Michele Mercurio (M)

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.Le Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.

Giorgio Gasparini (G)

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.Le Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.

Olimpio Galasso (O)

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.Le Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy. galasso@unicz.it.

Filippo Familiari (F)

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.Le Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.

Erminia Cofano (E)

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.Le Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.

Valentina Sanzo (V)

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.Le Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.

Gianluca Ciolli (G)

Department of Orthopaedics, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

Katia Corona (K)

Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.

Simone Cerciello (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Casa di Cura Villa Betania, Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH