Evaluation of epiretinal membrane formation after scleral buckling for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: En face optical coherence tomography image-based study.
En face imaging
Epiretinal membrane
Optical coherence tomography
Posterior vitreous detachment
Retinal detachment
Scleral buckling
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2023
21 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
31
07
2023
accepted:
12
10
2023
revised:
07
10
2023
medline:
21
10
2023
pubmed:
21
10
2023
entrez:
21
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To assess epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation, severity, and the associated risk factors after scleral buckling using en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Medical records of 61 consecutive patients (66 eyes) with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment who underwent scleral buckling were retrospectively reviewed. Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was determined based on B-scan OCT images. En face OCT images were used to visualize the ERM and retinal folds. ERM formation was identified by comparing en face images pre- and post-surgery. The maximum depth of the retinal folds (MDRF) was measured using en face imaging to objectively assess traction strength. ERM formation occurred in 15 (22.7%) eyes at the final visit; the foveal pit was preserved in all cases. Parafoveal retinal folds were present in 5 (7.6%) eyes, with a mean MDRF of 21.8 ± 12.6 µm. No significant difference was observed in best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) between the ERM formation (-0.019 ± 0.128) and non-ERM formation (-0.001 ± 0.213) groups at the final visit (P = 0.593; Mann-Whitney U test). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age and the presence of PVD were significant risk factors for ERM formation (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.14, P = 0.032; odds ratio 5.26, 95% confidence interval 1.06-26.10, P = 0.042; respectively). ERM occurred in 22.7% of cases but was mild and did not affect visual acuity. Older age and the presence of PVD are risk factors for ERM formation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37864637
doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06285-w
pii: 10.1007/s00417-023-06285-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Matoba R, Morizane Y (2021) Surgical treatment of epiretinal membrane. Acta Med Okayama 75:403–413. https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/62378
doi: 10.18926/AMO/62378
pubmed: 34511606
Lobes LA Jr, Burton TC (1978) The incidence of macular pucker after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 85:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76668-1
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76668-1
pubmed: 619688
Azad RV, Chanana B, Sharma YR, Vohra R (2007) Primary vitrectomy versus conventional retinal detachment surgery in phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:540–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00888.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00888.x
pubmed: 17355251
Kobashi H, Takano M, Yanagita T et al (2014) Scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 542 eyes. Curr Eye Res 39:204–211. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2013.838270
doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.838270
pubmed: 24144398
Shu I, Ishikawa H, Nishikawa H et al (2019) Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for young japanese patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the era of microincision surgery: real-world evidence from a multicentre study in Japan. Acta Ophthalmol 97:e736–e741. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14050
doi: 10.1111/aos.14050
pubmed: 30741467
Hirakata T, Hiratsuka Y, Yamamoto S et al (2021) Risk factors for macular pucker after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Sci Rep 11:18276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97738-x
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97738-x
pubmed: 34521926
pmcid: 8440624
Koriyama M, Nishimura T, Matsubara T et al (2007) Prospective study comparing the effectiveness of scleral buckling to vitreous surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 51:360–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-007-0463-0
doi: 10.1007/s10384-007-0463-0
pubmed: 17926113
Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H et al (2005) Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation–report no. 1. Ophthalmology 112:1421–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.018
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.018
pubmed: 15961159
Huang C, Fu T, Zhang T et al (2013) Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment as accessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a retrospective observational case series. BMC Ophthalmol 13:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-13-12
doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-12
pubmed: 23587195
pmcid: 3651356
Uemura A, Ideta H, Nagasaki H et al (1992) Macular pucker after retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmic Surg 23:116–119
pubmed: 1549287
Hirano M, Morizane Y, Kimura S et al (2018) Assessment of lamellar macular hole and macular pseudohole with a combination of En face and radial B-scan optical coherence tomography imaging. Am J Ophthalmol 188:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.016PMID-29360459
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.016PMID-29360459
pubmed: 29360459
Hirano M, Morizane Y, Kanzaki Y et al (2020) En face image-based analysis of retinal traction caused by epiretinal membrane and its relationship with visual functions. Retina 40:1262–1271. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002569
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002569
pubmed: 31136461
Fujiwara A, Kanzaki Y, Kimura S et al (2021) En face image-based classification of diabetic macular edema using swept source optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep 11:7665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87440-3
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87440-3
pubmed: 33828222
pmcid: 8026626
Kanzaki S, Kanzaki Y, Doi S et al (2021) En face image-based analysis of epiretinal membrane formation after surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmol Retina 5:815–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.10.017
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.10.017
pubmed: 33130004
Kanzaki Y, Doi S, Matoba R et al (2021) Objective and quantitative estimation of the optimal timing for epiretinal membrane surgery on the basis of metamorphopsia. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003401
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003401
pubmed: 33130004
Kanzaki Y, Matoba R, Kimura S et al (2023) Epiretinal membrane impairs the inner retinal layer in a traction force-dependent manner. Ophthalmol Sci 3:100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100312
doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100312
pubmed: 37214764
pmcid: 10199250
Mino M, Matoba R, Kanzaki Y et al (2023) Quantitative analyses of retinal traction force and metamorphopsia in lamellar macular hole and related diseases. Ophthalmol Sci 3:100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100305
doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100305
pubmed: 37214763
pmcid: 10199245
Matoba R, Kanzaki Y, Kimura S et al (2023) A factor for predicting simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane removal: swept-source optical coherence tomography-based evaluation of epiretinal membrane adhesion to the retina. Jpn J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-00993-w
doi: 10.1007/s10384-023-00993-w
pubmed: 37561309
Matoba R, Kanzaki Y, Doi S et al (2021) Assessment of epiretinal membrane formation using en face optical coherence tomography after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259:2503–2512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05118-y
doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05118-y
pubmed: 33710473
Govetto A, Lalane RA 3rd, Sarraf D et al (2017) Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol 175:99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.006
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.006
pubmed: 27993592
Moon SY, Park SP, Kim Y-K (2020) Evaluation of posterior vitreous detachment using ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol 98:e29–e35. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14189
doi: 10.1111/aos.14189
pubmed: 31301107
Pang CE, Freund KB, Engelbert M (2014) Enhanced vitreous imaging technique with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for evaluation of posterior vitreous detachment. JAMA Ophthalmol 132:1148–1150. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1037
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1037
pubmed: 25010436
Abraham JR, Ehlers JP (2020) Posterior vitreous detachment: methods for detection. Ophthalmol Retina 4:119–121
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.12.014
pubmed: 32033710
Clarkson JG, Green WR, Massof D (1977) A histopathologic review of 168 cases of preretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 84:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(77)90317-8
doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(77)90317-8
pubmed: 900209
Machemer R, van Horn D, Aaberg TM (1978) Pigment epithelial proliferation in human retinal detachment with massive periretinal proliferation. Am J Ophthalmol 85:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75946-x
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75946-x
pubmed: 623188