Impact of active vision therapy compared to conventional patching therapy on visual acuity and stereoacuity in children with amblyopia.

Active vision therapy Amblyopia Patching therapy Stereoacuity Visual acuity

Journal

Journal of optometry
ISSN: 1989-1342
Titre abrégé: J Optom
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101482903

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 11 03 2023
revised: 28 05 2023
accepted: 14 06 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 23 10 2023
entrez: 22 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To compare improvements in visual acuity (VA) and stereoacuity between active vision therapy (AVT) and conventional patching therapy in children with amblyopia. This study included 65 children aged 5 to 16 years (mean age±SD, 11.00±3.29 years) with unilateral amblyopia. Among them, 31 children underwent active vision therapy (AVT group), and 34 children underwent conventional patching therapy (patching group). AVT group underwent three sequential phases of AVT: Monocular phase (pursuit, saccades, fixation, visuomotor, eye-hand coordination, and central peripheral activities), biocular phase (diplopia awareness, antisuppression, monocular fixation in a binocular field, accommodative activities, bilateral integration, and fine motor activities) and binocular phase (fusion and stereopsis). Patching group patched their fellow eyes as per guidelines by Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Best-corrected monocular VA and stereoacuity were measured at baseline and after three months of therapy in both groups. There were significant improvements in the mean acuities in amblyopic eye (AE) in both AVT (0.32±0.11 logMAR, p <0.001) and patching groups (0.27±0.19 logMAR, p ˂ 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in mean acuity gains in AE between AVT and patching groups (p = 0.059). Mean gains in stereoacuities (log seconds of arc) were statistically significant in both AVT (0.81±0.34, p < 0.001) and patching groups (0.32±0.34, p < 0.001). The stereoacuity gain in the AVT group was significantly higher compared to patching group (p < 0.001). Active vision therapy had a better impact than conventional patching therapy in terms of improvement of stereoacuity but not in terms of VA when used for treating children with amblyopia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37866177
pii: S1888-4296(23)00032-8
doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.100484
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100484

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest No potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Rinkal Suwal (R)

Department of Optometry, BP Eye Foundation, Hospital for Children, Eye, ENT, and Rehabilitation Services (CHEERS), Bhaktapur, Nepal. Electronic address: rinkalsuwal@gmail.com.

Mahesh Kumar Dev (MK)

School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.

Bijay Khatri (B)

Academic and Research Department, BP Eye Foundation, Hospital for Children, Eye, ENT, and Rehabilitation Services (CHEERS), Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Deepak Khadka (D)

Department of Ophthalmology, BP Eye Foundation, Hospital for Children, Eye, ENT, and Rehabilitation Services (CHEERS), Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Arjun Shrestha (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, BP Eye Foundation, Hospital for Children, Eye, ENT, and Rehabilitation Services (CHEERS), Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Samata Sharma (S)

Department of Ophthalmology, BP Eye Foundation, Hospital for Children, Eye, ENT, and Rehabilitation Services (CHEERS), Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Madan Prasad Upadhyay (MP)

Department of Ophthalmology, BP Eye Foundation, Hospital for Children, Eye, ENT, and Rehabilitation Services (CHEERS), Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Classifications MeSH