Comparative assessment of fully laparoscopic Duhamel-Z with minimal rectorectal dissection vs. laparoscopy-assisted Duhamel-Z with blunt manual rectorectal dissection for total colonic aganglionosis.

continence duhamel-Z laparoscopy retrorectal dissection total colonic aganlionosis

Journal

Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 10 07 2023
accepted: 11 09 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 23 10 2023
entrez: 23 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Early postoperative outcome (EPO) was compared between fully laparoscopic Duhamel-Z (F-Dz) and laparoscopy-assisted Duhamel-Z (A-Dz) anastomoses performed for total colonic aganglionosis (TCA). EPO was assessed quarterly for the first year after F-Dz/A-Dz using a continence evaluation score (CES) based on stool frequency (motions/day) and stool consistency (0 = liquid, 1 = soft, 2 = formed), presence of anal erosion (0 = severe, 1 = moderate, 2 = mild), and incidence of enterocolitis.Surgical technique involved taking the ileostomy down, dissecting the colon laparoscopically, and preparing the pull-through ileum through the stoma wound. In F-Dz ( Subject backgrounds were similar. Mean quarterly data were: frequency (F-Dz: 4.67, 4.67, 4.67, 3.33) vs. (A-Dz: 7.27, 7.09, 6.18, 5.36) Overall, EPO after F-Dz was better than after A-Dz.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37868263
doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1255899
pmc: PMC10585356
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1255899

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Miyano, Iida, Ebata, Abe, Kato, Mikami, Ishii, Lane, Yamataka and Okazaki.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jan;44(1):257-65; discussion 265
pubmed: 19159753
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Mar;53(3):531-536
pubmed: 28705638
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1325-31
pubmed: 22044983
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Jun;17(3):395-8
pubmed: 17570797
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Oct;27(10):1047-52
pubmed: 21809028
J Pediatr Surg. 1981 Dec;16(6):840-3
pubmed: 7338764
Ann Surg. 1972 Sep;176(3):343-6
pubmed: 5073220
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Mar;27(3):302-305
pubmed: 28080215
Surgery. 1967 Apr;61(4):503-8
pubmed: 6020953
Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 18;10:900081
pubmed: 36061389

Auteurs

Go Miyano (G)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Hisae Iida (H)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Yu Ebata (Y)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Eri Abe (E)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Haruki Kato (H)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Takafumi Mikami (T)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Junya Ishii (J)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Geoffrey J Lane (GJ)

Pediatric General & Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

Atsuyuki Yamataka (A)

Pediatric General & Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

Tadaharu Okazaki (T)

Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Classifications MeSH