Abscopal effect in metastatic breast cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy in the absence of immunotherapy.
abscopal effect
breast cancer
metastasis
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
stereotactic body radiotherapy
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
20
06
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
23
10
2023
entrez:
23
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we aimed to assess the abscopal effect (AE) after CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic breast cancer patients without immunotherapy. We reviewed breast cancer patients who received SBRT with a fraction size of ≥ 6 Gy for metastatic lesions between July 2008 and December 2021. We selected patients who had at least one measurable extracranial lesion in addition to SBRT target lesions and were not treated with immunotherapy. A total of 40 SBRT cases from 34 patients were included in the analysis. The AE was defined as occurring before the overall progression of the disease, regardless of the use of systemic treatment. The median follow-up duration was 16.4 months. Among 40 SBRT cases, the AE was observed in 10 (25.0%) with a median interval of 2.1 months. Of these lesions, 70.0% did not progress for one year. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no change in systemic treatment after SBRT was significantly associated with an increase in the AE (odds ratio [OR] = 1.428, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.108 - 1.841, p = 0.009). A post-SBRT neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of < 2 marginally increased the AE (OR = 1.275, 95% CI = 0.998 - 1.629, p = 0.060). However, a high SBRT dose and large planning target volume did not (p = 0.858 and 0.152, respectively) in univariate analysis. One out of four patients experienced the AE after SBRT in the absence of immunotherapy. The AE could occur more frequently when systemic treatment remains unchanged, and patients have a low NLR after SBRT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37869087
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1243053
pmc: PMC10587686
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1243053Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Kim and Chang.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Dec 15;26(24):6437-6444
pubmed: 33028595
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Sep;162:60-67
pubmed: 34237343
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Aug;85:106663
pubmed: 32521494
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 02;20(9):
pubmed: 31052488
Br J Radiol. 1953 May;26(305):234-41
pubmed: 13042090
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov 26;14(1):212
pubmed: 31771654
Cancer Cell. 2016 Jul 11;30(1):120-135
pubmed: 27374224
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 09;8:15618
pubmed: 28598415
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):571-9
pubmed: 26867885
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Sep 1;108(1):212-224
pubmed: 32417411
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 26;13(1):
pubmed: 33375357
Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 06;10:379
pubmed: 30894861
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):977
pubmed: 31640607
Future Oncol. 2021 May;17(13):1683-1694
pubmed: 33726502
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):795-803
pubmed: 26095785
J Clin Invest. 2020 Jan 2;130(1):389-403
pubmed: 31600172
Lancet. 1989 Oct 14;2(8668):891-5
pubmed: 2477656
Cell. 2023 Mar 30;186(7):1432-1447.e17
pubmed: 37001503