The effect of dynamic versus static visualizations on acquisition of basketball game actions: a diurnal study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 10 2023
23 10 2023
Historique:
received:
07
08
2023
accepted:
18
10
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
24
10
2023
entrez:
23
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to examine the effect of time of day (TOD) on the acquisition of basketball game actions from dynamic and static visualizations in physical education students (novice practitioners). Participants were quasi-randomly assigned to three treatments (static pictures, enriched static-pictures, or video). Morning and late-afternoon sessions were conducted, involving study phases and immediate-recall tests [game comprehension (GC) test and game performance (GP) test]. Oral temperature (OT) and mood states (MS) were also measured. Compared to the morning, the results revealed that afternoon resulted in higher OT, higher negative MS (e.g., anxiety and fatigue), and lower positive MS (i.e., vigor) in all experimental conditions. Moreover, the results showed that: (a) GC and GP decreased throughout the day (regardless of treatments), (b) GC and GP were better with enriched static-pictures (with arrows) than with static pictures, at both TOD, and (c) the video resulted in better GC and GP than the two static presentations, at both TOD. This study (a) highlights the morning's superiority in the acquisition of motor skills from dynamic and static visualizations, due to mood disturbances and lower arousal levels, and (b) encourages basketball teachers to use video modeling by experts, particularly in the morning, for explaining tactical skills.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37872241
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45278-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-45278-x
pmc: PMC10593838
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18077Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., Loyens, S. M. & van Gog, T. Learning from video modeling examples: Content kept equal, adults are more effective models than peers. Learn. Instr. 44, 22–30 (2016).
Jarraya, M. et al. Which presentation speed is better for learning basketball tactical actions through video modeling examples? The influence of content complexity. Front. Psychol. 10, 2356 (2019).
pubmed: 31695646
pmcid: 6817615
H’mida, C. et al. Is the human movement effect stable over time? The effects of presentation format on acquisition and retention of a motor skill. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 38, 167–177 (2022).
Grezes, J. & Decety, J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 12, 1–19 (2001).
pubmed: 11198101
Romano-Smith, S., Wood, G., Wright, D. J. & Wakefield, C. J. Simultaneous and alternate action observation and motor imagery combinations improve aiming performance. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 38, 100–106 (2018).
Wild, K. S., Poliakoff, E., Jerrison, A. & Gowen, E. The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation. Exp. Brain Res. 204, 353–360 (2010).
pubmed: 19826797
Sweller, J. et al. Measuring cognitive load. Cognitive Load Theory, 71–85 (2011).
Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N. & Sweller, J. Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learn. Instr. 22, 449–457 (2012).
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P. & Paas, F. Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: Three potential moderators of effectiveness. Comput. Educ. 85, 1–13 (2015).
Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 309–326 (2007).
Ayres, P. & Paas, F. Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. Off. J. Soc. Appl. Res. Mem. Cognit. 21, 695–700 (2007).
Rekik, G. et al. Uncovering the role of different instructional designs when learning tactical scenes of play through dynamic visualizations: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 256 (2021).
Ericsson, K. A. & Lehmann, A. C. Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 47, 273–305 (1996).
pubmed: 15012483
Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E. & Säljö, R. Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 23, 523–552 (2011).
Garland, T. & Sanchez, C. A. Rotational perspective and learning procedural tasks from dynamic media. Comput. Educ. 69, 31–37 (2013).
Boucheix, J.-M. & Forestier, C. Reducing the transience effect of animations does not (always) lead to better performance in children learning a complex hand procedure. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 358–370 (2017).
Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C. & Qian, N. Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 348–353 (2009).
Rekik, G., Khacharem, A., Belkhir, Y., Bali, N. & Jarraya, M. The instructional benefits of dynamic visualizations in the acquisition of basketball tactical actions. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 35, 74–81 (2019).
Marcus, N., Cleary, B., Wong, A. & Ayres, P. Should hand actions be observed when learning hand motor skills from instructional animations?. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 2172–2178 (2013).
Rekik, G., Khacharem, A., Belkhir, Y., Bali, N. & Jarraya, M. The effect of visualization format and content complexity on acquisition of tactical actions in basketball. Learn. Motiv. 65, 10–19 (2019).
Paas, F. & Sweller, J. An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 24, 27–45 (2012).
Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004).
pubmed: 15217330
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E. & Haggard, P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1243–1249 (2005).
pubmed: 15616133
Stern, S. A. & Alberini, C. M. Mechanisms of memory enhancement. Wiley Interdisci. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 5, 37–53 (2013).
Mezghanni, N. et al. Using coordinated visual and verbal cues in complex multimedia materials to improve tactical learning in soccer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 3365 (2022).
pubmed: 35329051
pmcid: 8951231
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (4th ed.). (Human Kinetics, 2005).
Johnson, M. et al. Short-term memory, alertness and performance: A reappraisal of their relationship to body temperature. J. Sleep Res. 1, 24–29 (1992).
pubmed: 10607021
Wright, K. P. Jr., Hull, J. T. & Czeisler, C. A. Relationship between alertness, performance, and body temperature in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 283, R1370–R1377 (2002).
pubmed: 12388468
Ramírez, C. et al. Circadian rhythms in phonological and visuospatial storage components of working memory. Biol. Rhythm Res. 37, 433–441 (2006).
Gates, A. I. Variations in Efficiency During the Day: Together with Practise Effects, Sex Differences, and Correlations. Vol. 2 (University of California Press, 1916).
Baddeley, A., Hatter, J., Scott, D. & Snashall, A. Memory and time of day. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 22, 605–609 (1970).
Folkard, S. & Monk, T. H. Circadian rhythms in human memory. Brit. J. Psychol. 71, 295–307 (1980).
Dunne, M. P., Roche, F. & Hartley, L. R. Effects of time of day on immediate recall and sustained retrieval from semantic memory. J. General Psychol. 117, 403–410 (1990).
Wyatt, J. K., Cecco, A.R.-D., Czeisler, C. A. & Dijk, D.-J. Circadian temperature and melatonin rhythms, sleep, and neurobehavioral function in humans living on a 20-h day. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 277, R1152–R1163 (1999).
Ebbinghaus, H. Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur Experimentellen Psychologie. (Duncker & Humblot, 1885).
Blake, M. Time of day effects on performance in a range of tasks. Psychon. Sci. 9, 349–350 (1967).
Blake, J. R. in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 303–310 (Cambridge University Press, 1975).
Folkard, S., Monk, T. H., Bradbury, R. & Rosenthall, J. Time of day effects in school children’s immediate and delayed recall of meaningful material. Brit. J. Psychol. 1, 45–50 (1977).
Gunter, B., Jarret, J. & Furnham, A. Time of day effects on immediate memory for television news. Hum. Learn. 2, 261–267 (1983).
Furnham, A. & Gunter, B. Effects of time of day and medium of presentation on immediate recall of violent and non-violent news. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 1, 255–262 (1987).
Colquhoun, W. P., Blake, M. & Edwards, R. Experimental studies of shift-work I: A comparison of ‘rotating’and ‘stabilized’4-hour shift systems. Ergonomics 11, 437–453 (1968).
pubmed: 5682413
Colquhoun, W. P. Circadian variations in mental efficiency (Circadian rhythms in human mental performance from waking day, round of clock and simulated shiftwork studies). Biological Rhythms and Human Performance. (A 73–33154 16–04) 39–107 (Academic Press, London and New York, 1971).
Cohen, C. & Muehl, G. Human orcadian rhythms in resting and exercise pulse rates. Ergonomics 20, 475–479 (1977).
pubmed: 590244
Kleinsmith, L. J. & Kaplan, S. Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval. J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 190 (1963).
pubmed: 14033436
Craik, F. I. & Blankstein, K. R. Psychophysiology and human memory. Research in Psychophysiology, 388–417 (1975).
Folkard, S. Time of day and level of processing. Mem. Cognit. 7, 247–252 (1979).
Natale, V. & Lorenzetti, R. Influences of morningness-eveningness and time of day on narrative comprehension. Pers. Individ. Differ. 23, 685–690 (1997).
Eysenck, H. J., Nias, D. & Cox, D. Sport and personality. Adv. Behav. Res. Ther. 4, 1–56 (1982).
Pageaux, B. & Lepers, R. The effects of mental fatigue on sport-related performance. Progr. Brain Res. 240, 291–315 (2018).
Saddoud, A. et al. One night of total sleep deprivation impairs decision-making skills, anaerobic performances, mood states, and perceptual responses in elite Kung-Fu athletes. Biol. Rhythm Res. 54, 102–116 (2023).
Oakhill, J. Effects of time of day and information importance on adults’ memory for a short story. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 38, 419–430 (1986).
Höffler, T. N. & Leutner, D. Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learn. Inst. 17, 722–738 (2007).
Arguel, A. & Jamet, E. Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 354–359 (2009).
Souissi, N. et al. Dynamic visual support is superior to its static counterpart in learning a series of Judo refereeing gestures. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 20, 1316–1329 (2022).
Rajmohan, V. & Mohandas, E. Mirror neuron system. Indian J. Psychiatry 49, 66 (2007).
pubmed: 20640069
pmcid: 2900004
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P. & Sweller, J. The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 21, 21–30 (2009).
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Mackenzie, R., Lozano, S. & Morrison, J. Enriching animations. Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, 263–285 (2008).
Rekik, G., Belkhir, Y. & Jarraya, M. Improving soccer knowledge from computerized game diagrams: Benefits of sequential instructional arrows. Percept. Motor Skills 2, 912–931 (2021).
Münzer, S., Seufert, T. & Brünken, R. Learning from multimedia presentations: Facilitation function of animations and spatial abilities. Learn. Individ. Differ. 19, 481–485 (2009).
Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P. & Paas, F. Gender effects when learning manipulative tasks from instructional animations and static presentations. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18, 37–52 (2015).
Rekik, G. et al. Learning basketball tactical actions from video modeling and static pictures: When gender matters. Children 8, 1060 (2021).
pubmed: 34828773
pmcid: 8618279
Evansová, K. et al. The effect of chronotype and time of assessment on cognitive performance. Biol. Rhythm Res. 53, 608–627 (2022).
Rekik, G., Belkhir, Y. & Jarraya, M. Searching to improve learning from complex animated basketball scenes: When decreasing the presentation speed is more efficient than using segmentation. Technol. Pedag. Educ. 30, 393–407 (2021).
Taylor, N. A., Tipton, M. J. & Kenny, G. P. Considerations for the measurement of core, skin and mean body temperatures. J. Therm. Biol. 46, 72–101 (2014).
pubmed: 25455943
Robin, N., Toussaint, L., Charles-Charlery, C. & Coudevylle, G. R. Free throw performance in non-expert basketball players: The effect of dynamic motor imagery combined with action observation. Learn. Motiv. 68, 101595 (2019).
Hatchi, V. & Nicolas, R. Apprentissage par observation combiné à l’imagerie motrice: Influence du type de modèle vidéo sur la performance du lancer-franc au basket-ball chez des collégiens. Staps 139, 57–73 (2023).
Portaluppi, F., Smolensky, M. H. & Touitou, Y. Ethics and methods for biological rhythm research on animals and human beings. Chronobiol. Int.. 27, 1911–1929 (2010).
pubmed: 20969531
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007).
pubmed: 17695343
Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis Jbr the behavioral. Sci. Hillsdale (NJ) Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. 18, 74 (1988).
Horne, J. A. & Ostberg, O. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int. J. Chronobiol. 4, 97–110 (1976).
pubmed: 1027738
Yang, H.-Y. Effects of interactivity and progressive visuospatial cues on learners’ comprehension of dynamic visualizations. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 53, 178–205 (2021).
Cayrou, S., Dickès, P. & Dolbeault, S. Version française du profile of mood states (POMS-f) [French version of the Profile Of Mood States (POMS-f)]. J. Thér. Comport. Cognit. 13, 83–88 (2003).