Identifying the best candidates for reduced port gastrectomy.
C-reactive protein
Gastrectomy
Gastric cancer
Minimally invasive surgery
Journal
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
ISSN: 1436-3305
Titre abrégé: Gastric Cancer
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 100886238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
25
07
2023
accepted:
30
09
2023
medline:
4
1
2024
pubmed:
24
10
2023
entrez:
23
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous studies have focused on the non-inferiority of RPG compared with conventional port gastrectomy (CPG); however, we assumed that some candidates might derive more significant benefit from RPG over CPG. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and perioperative parameters of 1442 patients with gastric cancer treated by gastrectomy between 2009 and 2022. The C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 3 (CRPD3) was used as a surrogate parameter for surgical trauma. Patients were grouped according to the extent of gastrectomy [subtotal gastrectomy (STG) or total gastrectomy (TG)] and lymph node dissection (D1+ or D2). The degree of surgical trauma, bowel recovery, and hospital stay between RPG and CPG was compared among those patient groups. Of 1442 patients, 889, 354, 129, and 70 were grouped as STGD1+, STGD2, TGD1+, and TGD2, respectively. Compared with CPG, RPG significantly decreased CRPD3 only among patients in the STGD1+ group (CPG: n = 653, 84.49 mg/L, 95% CI 80.53-88.45 vs. RPG: n = 236, 70.01 mg/L, 95% CI 63.92-76.09, P < 0.001). In addition, the RPG method significantly shortens bowel recovery and hospital stay in the STGD1+ (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), STGD2 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), and TGD1+ (P = 0.026 and P = 0.007), respectively. No difference was observed in the TGD2 group (P = 0.313 and P = 0.740). The best candidates for RPG are patients who undergo STGD1+, followed by STGD2 and TG D1+, considering the reduction in CRPD3, bowel recovery, and hospital stay.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have focused on the non-inferiority of RPG compared with conventional port gastrectomy (CPG); however, we assumed that some candidates might derive more significant benefit from RPG over CPG.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and perioperative parameters of 1442 patients with gastric cancer treated by gastrectomy between 2009 and 2022. The C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 3 (CRPD3) was used as a surrogate parameter for surgical trauma. Patients were grouped according to the extent of gastrectomy [subtotal gastrectomy (STG) or total gastrectomy (TG)] and lymph node dissection (D1+ or D2). The degree of surgical trauma, bowel recovery, and hospital stay between RPG and CPG was compared among those patient groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 1442 patients, 889, 354, 129, and 70 were grouped as STGD1+, STGD2, TGD1+, and TGD2, respectively. Compared with CPG, RPG significantly decreased CRPD3 only among patients in the STGD1+ group (CPG: n = 653, 84.49 mg/L, 95% CI 80.53-88.45 vs. RPG: n = 236, 70.01 mg/L, 95% CI 63.92-76.09, P < 0.001). In addition, the RPG method significantly shortens bowel recovery and hospital stay in the STGD1+ (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), STGD2 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), and TGD1+ (P = 0.026 and P = 0.007), respectively. No difference was observed in the TGD2 group (P = 0.313 and P = 0.740).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The best candidates for RPG are patients who undergo STGD1+, followed by STGD2 and TG D1+, considering the reduction in CRPD3, bowel recovery, and hospital stay.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37872358
doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01438-6
pii: 10.1007/s10120-023-01438-6
pmc: PMC10761455
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
176-186Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Health and Welfare
ID : HI22C0767
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Chow A, Aziz O, Purkayastha S, et al. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis: feasibility in pediatric patients. Diagn Therap Endosc. 2010;2010:1–3.
doi: 10.1155/2010/294958
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1350–7.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215
pubmed: 26903580
Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(2):142–51.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30332-2
pubmed: 31757656
Kim H-H, Han S-U, Kim M-C, et al. Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(4):506.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727
pubmed: 30730546
pmcid: 6459124
McGregor CGC, Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, et al. Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(4):614–22.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1432-y
pubmed: 21308488
Ojima T, Nakamura M, Hayata K, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(10):954.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3182
pubmed: 34468701
Vittimberga FJ Jr, Foley DP, Meyers WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg. 1998;227(3):326–34.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199803000-00003
pubmed: 9527054
pmcid: 1191269
Cuschieri A. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2011;7(1):3–5.
doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72356
pubmed: 21197235
pmcid: 3002003
Lee JH, Ryu KW, Kim YW, et al. Staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer: a single port method. J Surg Oncol. 2003;84(1):50–2.
doi: 10.1002/jso.10289
pubmed: 12949992
Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, et al. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorect Dis. 2008;10(8):823–6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01660.x
Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2400–4.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1563-3
pubmed: 21298524
Ozdemir BA, Thomas RL, Soon Y. Single-port laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with DIalpha lymphadenectomy. Surg Innov. 2011;18(4):NP1-4.
doi: 10.1177/1553350611400759
pubmed: 21398339
Iida A, Goi T, Fujimoto D, et al. Initial results of reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:16–16.
doi: 10.21037/ales.2017.01.11
Inaki N, Tsuji T, Doden K, et al. Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:38–38.
doi: 10.21037/tgh.2016.04.04
pubmed: 28138605
pmcid: 5244795
Omori T, Fujiwara Y, Moon J, et al. Comparison of single-incision and conventional multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(S5):817–24.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5485-8
pubmed: 27510844
Baumann H, Gauldie J. Regulation of hepatic acute phase plasma protein genes by hepatocyte stimulating factors and other mediators of inflammation. Mol Biol Med. 1990;7(2):147–59.
pubmed: 1692952
Baigrie RJ, Lamont PM, Kwiatkowski D, et al. Systemic cytokine response after major surgery. Br J Surg. 1992;79(8):757–60.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790813
pubmed: 1393463
Brewster N, Guthrie C, McBirnie J. CRP levels as a measure of surgical trauma: a comparison of different general surgical procedures. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994;39(2):86–8.
pubmed: 7520075
Dutta S, Fullarton GM, Forshaw MJ, et al. Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications. World J Surg. 2011;35(5):1017–25.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1002-1
pubmed: 21350898
Hübner M, Mantziari S, Demartines N, et al. Postoperative albumin drop is a marker for surgical stress and a predictor for clinical outcome: a pilot study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1–8.
doi: 10.1155/2016/8743187
Kim EY, Yim HW, Park CH, et al. C-reactive protein can be an early predictor of postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):445–54.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5272-4
pubmed: 27734201
Lee S-H, Kim KH, Choi CW, et al. Reduction rate of C-reactive protein as an early predictor of postoperative complications and a reliable discharge indicator after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;97(2):65.
doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.2.65
pubmed: 31384611
pmcid: 6669129
Lee CM, Park S, Park SH, et al. Short-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic gastrectomy with articulating instruments for gastric cancer compared with the robotic approach. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9355.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36601-7
pubmed: 37291374
pmcid: 10250398
Roh CK, Choi S, Seo WJ, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between integrated robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):485.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57413-z
pubmed: 31949219
pmcid: 6965606
Lee JH, Lee MS, Kim HH, et al. Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a porcine model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(10):935–40.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0280
pubmed: 22044252
Kawamura H, Tanioka T, Kuji M, et al. The initial experience of dual port laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy as a reduced port surgery for total gastrectomy. Gastr Cancer. 2013;16(4):602–8.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-012-0212-z
Ahn SH, Son SY, Jung DH, et al. Pure single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: comparative study with multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(5):933–43.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.009
pubmed: 25256369
Omori T, Masuzawa T, Akamatsu H, et al. A simple and safe method for Billroth I reconstruction in single-incision laparoscopic gastrectomy using a novel intracorporeal triangular anastomotic technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):613–6.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2419-7
pubmed: 24297650
Usui S, Tashiro M, Haruki S, et al. Triple-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for the resection of gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7(3):197–205.
doi: 10.1111/ases.12109
pubmed: 24767611
Dobson GP. Addressing the global burden of trauma in major surgery. Front Surg. 2015;2:43.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00043
pubmed: 26389122
pmcid: 4558465
Watt DG, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Routine clinical markers of the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response after elective operation: a systematic review. Surgery. 2015;157(2):362–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.009
pubmed: 25616950
Winsen M, McSorley ST, McLeod R, et al. Postoperative C-reactive protein concentrations to predict infective complications following gastrectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2021;124(7):1060–9.
doi: 10.1002/jso.26613
pubmed: 34350587
Schug SA. 2011—the global year against acute pain. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39(1):11–4.
doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900102
pubmed: 21375085
Chiung Ta LuT, Gan P, Versace V. Fewer ports cut opioid use and length of stay in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2021;25(2):e2020.00093. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00093 .
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00093
Kawamura H, Tanioka T, Shibuya K, et al. Comparison of the invasiveness between reduced-port laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Int Surg. 2013;98(3):247–53.
doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-12-00025
pubmed: 23971779
pmcid: 3756848
Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, et al. Comparison of reduced port totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2567–72.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4333-y
pubmed: 25564174
Macías AA, Finneran JJ. Regional anesthesia techniques for pain management for laparoscopic surgery: a review of the current literature. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26(1):33–42.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01000-6
pubmed: 35084655
pmcid: 8792136