The role of beta-blocker drugs in critically ill patients: a SIAARTI expert consensus statement.
Adults
Critically ill patient
ICU
Sepsis
Tachyarrhythmia
β-blockers
Journal
Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care
ISSN: 2731-3786
Titre abrégé: J Anesth Analg Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918591885906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Oct 2023
23 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
28
06
2023
accepted:
10
10
2023
medline:
24
10
2023
pubmed:
24
10
2023
entrez:
23
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The role of β-blockers in the critically ill has been studied, and data on the protective effects of these drugs on critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature over the last two decades. However, consensus and guidelines by scientific societies on the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients are still lacking. The purpose of this document is to support the clinical decision-making process regarding the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients. The recipients of this document are physicians, nurses, healthcare personnel, and other professionals involved in the patient's care process. The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects underlying the use of β-blockers in critically ill adult patients. The methodology followed by the experts during this process was in line with principles of modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales in the form of informative text. The overall list of statements was subjected to blind votes for consensus. The literature search suggests that adrenergic stress and increased heart rate in critically ill patients are associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality. Heart rate control thus seems to be critical in the management of the critically ill patient, requiring careful clinical evaluation aimed at both the differential diagnosis to treat secondary tachycardia and the treatment of rhythm disturbance. In addition, the use of β-blockers for the treatment of persistent tachycardia may be considered in patients with septic shock once hypovolemia has been ruled out. Intravenous application should be the preferred route of administration. β-blockers protective effects in critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature. Their use in the acute treatment of increased heart rate requires understanding of the pathophysiology and careful differential diagnosis, as all causes of tachycardia should be ruled out and addressed first.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The role of β-blockers in the critically ill has been studied, and data on the protective effects of these drugs on critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature over the last two decades. However, consensus and guidelines by scientific societies on the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients are still lacking. The purpose of this document is to support the clinical decision-making process regarding the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients. The recipients of this document are physicians, nurses, healthcare personnel, and other professionals involved in the patient's care process.
METHODS
METHODS
The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects underlying the use of β-blockers in critically ill adult patients. The methodology followed by the experts during this process was in line with principles of modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales in the form of informative text. The overall list of statements was subjected to blind votes for consensus.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The literature search suggests that adrenergic stress and increased heart rate in critically ill patients are associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality. Heart rate control thus seems to be critical in the management of the critically ill patient, requiring careful clinical evaluation aimed at both the differential diagnosis to treat secondary tachycardia and the treatment of rhythm disturbance. In addition, the use of β-blockers for the treatment of persistent tachycardia may be considered in patients with septic shock once hypovolemia has been ruled out. Intravenous application should be the preferred route of administration.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
β-blockers protective effects in critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature. Their use in the acute treatment of increased heart rate requires understanding of the pathophysiology and careful differential diagnosis, as all causes of tachycardia should be ruled out and addressed first.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37872608
doi: 10.1186/s44158-023-00126-2
pii: 10.1186/s44158-023-00126-2
pmc: PMC10591347
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
41Informations de copyright
© 2023. Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care.
Références
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:66-75
pubmed: 29937018
Crit Care. 2021 Jul 21;25(1):257
pubmed: 34289899
JAMA. 2013 Oct 23;310(16):1683-91
pubmed: 24108526
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1994-2010
pubmed: 35838226
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Mar 1;81(5):594-8
pubmed: 9514456
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 May;39(5):429-440
pubmed: 30848423
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;160(2):458-65
pubmed: 10430714
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247
pubmed: 34599691
Biol Neonate. 2004;86(1):39-47
pubmed: 15044824
Eur Heart J. 1995 Apr;16(4):521-8
pubmed: 7671898
J Intensive Care. 2021 May 08;9(1):39
pubmed: 33964987
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906
pubmed: 33789826
Lancet. 2008 May 31;371(9627):1839-47
pubmed: 18479744
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;29(6):1149-53
pubmed: 11395591
Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1452-1459
pubmed: 33619010
Shock. 2015 Oct;44(4):305-9
pubmed: 26125087
Anesthesiology. 2023 Jan 1;138(1):42-54
pubmed: 36227278
World J Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug 04;4(3):251-7
pubmed: 26261777
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2289-2300
pubmed: 33434497
Cardiovasc Res. 2022 Jul 20;118(9):2085-2102
pubmed: 34270705
J Crit Care. 2017 Oct;41:16-23
pubmed: 28463737
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 09;13:1043714
pubmed: 36699057
Chest. 2016 Jan;149(1):74-83
pubmed: 26270396
Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 7;41(46):4425-4440
pubmed: 33026079
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):229-243
pubmed: 32458170
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;125(6):1018-1024
pubmed: 32690246
Anesthesiology. 2023 Jan 1;138(1):7-9
pubmed: 36520077
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 19;17(2):213
pubmed: 23510336
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51
pubmed: 23984731
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 14;43(39):3826-3924
pubmed: 36017553
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1528-1534
pubmed: 27101380
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):833-834
pubmed: 32243866
Circulation. 2003 May 13;107(18):e117-9
pubmed: 12742970
Acute Crit Care. 2020 May;35(2):57-66
pubmed: 32506871
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):238-244
pubmed: 28292220
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979-83
pubmed: 6380323
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):48-56
pubmed: 25126880