Digital Training Program for Line Managers (Managing Minds at Work): Protocol for a Feasibility Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

acceptability anxiety burnout cluster randomised control trial depression digital training feasibility intervention managers mental health stress usability work workplace

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 05 05 2023
accepted: 17 07 2023
revised: 10 07 2023
medline: 24 10 2023
pubmed: 24 10 2023
entrez: 24 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mental health problems affect 1 in 6 workers annually and are one of the leading causes of sickness absence, with stress, anxiety, and depression being responsible for half of all working days lost in the United Kingdom. Primary interventions with a preventative focus are widely acknowledged as the priority for workplace mental health interventions. Line managers hold a primary role in preventing poor mental health within the workplace and, therefore, need to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to effectively carry out this role. However, most previous intervention studies have directly focused on increasing line managers' understanding and awareness of mental health rather than giving them the skills and competencies to take a proactive preventative approach in how they manage and design work. The Managing Minds at Work (MMW) digital training intervention was collaboratively designed to address this gap. The intervention aims to increase line managers' knowledge and confidence in preventing work-related stress and promoting mental health at work. It consists of 5 modules providing evidence-based interactive content on looking after your mental health, designing and managing work to promote mental well-being, management competencies that prevent work-related stress, developing a psychologically safe workplace, and having conversations about mental health at work. The primary aim of this study is to pilot and feasibility test MMW, a digital training intervention for line managers. We use a cluster randomized controlled trial design consisting of 2 arms, the intervention arm and a 3-month waitlist control, in this multicenter feasibility pilot study. Line managers in the intervention arm will complete a baseline questionnaire at screening, immediately post intervention (approximately 6 weeks after baseline), and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Line managers in the control arm will complete an initial baseline questionnaire, repeated after 3 months on the waitlist. They will then be granted access to the MMW intervention, following which they will complete the questionnaire post intervention. The direct reports of the line managers in both arms of the trial will also be invited to take part by completing questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. As a feasibility pilot study, a formal sample size is not required. A minimum of 8 clusters (randomized into 2 groups of 4) will be sought to inform a future trial from work organizations of different types and sectors. Recruitment for the study closed in January 2022. Overall, 24 organizations and 224 line managers have been recruited. Data analysis was finished in August 2023. The results from this feasibility study will provide insight into the usability and acceptability of the MMW intervention and its potential for improving line manager outcomes and those of their direct reports. These results will inform the development of subsequent trials. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05154019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05154019. DERR1-10.2196/48758.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mental health problems affect 1 in 6 workers annually and are one of the leading causes of sickness absence, with stress, anxiety, and depression being responsible for half of all working days lost in the United Kingdom. Primary interventions with a preventative focus are widely acknowledged as the priority for workplace mental health interventions. Line managers hold a primary role in preventing poor mental health within the workplace and, therefore, need to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to effectively carry out this role. However, most previous intervention studies have directly focused on increasing line managers' understanding and awareness of mental health rather than giving them the skills and competencies to take a proactive preventative approach in how they manage and design work. The Managing Minds at Work (MMW) digital training intervention was collaboratively designed to address this gap. The intervention aims to increase line managers' knowledge and confidence in preventing work-related stress and promoting mental health at work. It consists of 5 modules providing evidence-based interactive content on looking after your mental health, designing and managing work to promote mental well-being, management competencies that prevent work-related stress, developing a psychologically safe workplace, and having conversations about mental health at work.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The primary aim of this study is to pilot and feasibility test MMW, a digital training intervention for line managers.
METHODS METHODS
We use a cluster randomized controlled trial design consisting of 2 arms, the intervention arm and a 3-month waitlist control, in this multicenter feasibility pilot study. Line managers in the intervention arm will complete a baseline questionnaire at screening, immediately post intervention (approximately 6 weeks after baseline), and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Line managers in the control arm will complete an initial baseline questionnaire, repeated after 3 months on the waitlist. They will then be granted access to the MMW intervention, following which they will complete the questionnaire post intervention. The direct reports of the line managers in both arms of the trial will also be invited to take part by completing questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. As a feasibility pilot study, a formal sample size is not required. A minimum of 8 clusters (randomized into 2 groups of 4) will be sought to inform a future trial from work organizations of different types and sectors.
RESULTS RESULTS
Recruitment for the study closed in January 2022. Overall, 24 organizations and 224 line managers have been recruited. Data analysis was finished in August 2023.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results from this feasibility study will provide insight into the usability and acceptability of the MMW intervention and its potential for improving line manager outcomes and those of their direct reports. These results will inform the development of subsequent trials.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05154019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05154019.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/48758.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37874612
pii: v12i1e48758
doi: 10.2196/48758
pmc: PMC10630869
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05154019']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e48758

Informations de copyright

©Louise Thomson, Juliet Hassard, Alexandra Frost, Craig Bartle, Joanna Yarker, Fehmidah Munir, Richard Kneller, Steven Marwaha, Guy Daly, Sean Russell, Caroline Meyer, Benjamin Vaughan, Kristina Newman, Holly Blake. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 24.10.2023.

Références

J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):601-611
pubmed: 28120136
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 26;5(10):e007981
pubmed: 26503383
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):
pubmed: 32357424
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):
pubmed: 35805665
Trials. 2019 Dec 4;20(1):672
pubmed: 31801622
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;4(11):850-858
pubmed: 29031935
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 9;12(12):e060545
pubmed: 36600345
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;55(7):440-8
pubmed: 20704771
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jun;107(6):907-915
pubmed: 28426295
Perspect Public Health. 2023 May;143(3):124-125
pubmed: 37232255
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 06;17(1):
pubmed: 31935985
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 28;12(7):e059159
pubmed: 35902190
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jul;61(7):545-551
pubmed: 31045851
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jun;75(6):462-470
pubmed: 29563195
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):4-19
pubmed: 29939045
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63
pubmed: 18042300
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;61(10):817-23
pubmed: 15377767

Auteurs

Louise Thomson (L)

School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Juliet Hassard (J)

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Alexandra Frost (A)

Institute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Craig Bartle (C)

School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Joanna Yarker (J)

Department of Organisational Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Affinity Health at Work, London, United Kingdom.

Fehmidah Munir (F)

School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.

Richard Kneller (R)

School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Steven Marwaha (S)

Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Specialist Mood Disorders Clinic, The Zinnia Centre, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Guy Daly (G)

Office of the Provost, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.

Sean Russell (S)

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Caroline Meyer (C)

WMG, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.

Benjamin Vaughan (B)

Institute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Kristina Newman (K)

Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Holly Blake (H)

School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH