Challenges With the Use of Digital Sham: Systematic Review and Recommendations.
cognitive behavioral therapy
digital intervention
mobile phone
neurodegenerative diseases
neurosciences
placebo
psychiatric disorders
sham
systematic review
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 10 2023
24 10 2023
Historique:
received:
16
12
2022
accepted:
20
07
2023
revised:
26
06
2023
medline:
2
11
2023
pubmed:
24
10
2023
entrez:
24
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software-based products that prevent, manage, or treat a medical condition and are delivered through a smartphone app, web application, or wearable device. Clinical trials assessing DTx pose challenges, foremost among which is designing appropriate digital shams (or digital placebos), which should ideally mimic DTx (in terms of design, components, and duration of treatment) while omitting the active principle or component. The objective of our review was to understand how digital shams are being used in clinical research on DTx in neuroscience, which is the most common therapy area for DTx. We conducted a systematic literature review of DTx in neuroscience (including neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders) with a focus on controlled clinical trials involving digital shams. Studies were identified from trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, and Trial Trove) and through structured searches in MEDLINE and Embase (both via the Embase website) and were limited to articles in English published from 2010 onward. These were supplemented by keyword-based searches in PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar and bibliographic searches. Studies assessing DTx in neuroscience (including neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders) were included. Details related to the publication, DTx, comparator, patient population, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Our search criteria identified 461 neuroscience studies involving 213 unique DTx. Most DTx were extended reality based (86/213, 40.4%) or mobile device based (56/213, 26.3%); 313 were comparative, of which 68 (21.7%) used shams. The most common therapeutic areas assessed in these studies were stroke (42/213, 19.7%), depression (32/213, 15%), and anxiety (24/213, 11.3%). The most common treatments were cognitive behavioral therapy or behavioral therapy (67/213, 32.4%), physical rehabilitation (60/213, 28.2%), and cognitive training (41/213, 19.2%). We identified the following important issues related to the use of digital shams in neuroscience: shams were not validated before use in studies, they varied widely in design (from being nearly identical to the DTx to using different software programs altogether), and the level of patient engagement or satisfaction with the sham and the impact of the sham on study outcomes were infrequently reported. Digital shams are critical for the clinical development of DTx in neuroscience. Given the importance of sham controls in evaluating DTx efficacy, we provide recommendations on the key information that should be reported in a well-designed DTx trial and propose an algorithm to allow the correct interpretation of DTx study results. Sham-controlled studies should be routinely used in DTx trials-in early-phase studies-to help identify DTx active components and-in late-phase studies-to confirm the efficacy of DTx. The use of shams early in development will ensure that the appropriate sham control is used in later confirmatory trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software-based products that prevent, manage, or treat a medical condition and are delivered through a smartphone app, web application, or wearable device. Clinical trials assessing DTx pose challenges, foremost among which is designing appropriate digital shams (or digital placebos), which should ideally mimic DTx (in terms of design, components, and duration of treatment) while omitting the active principle or component.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of our review was to understand how digital shams are being used in clinical research on DTx in neuroscience, which is the most common therapy area for DTx.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature review of DTx in neuroscience (including neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders) with a focus on controlled clinical trials involving digital shams. Studies were identified from trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, and Trial Trove) and through structured searches in MEDLINE and Embase (both via the Embase website) and were limited to articles in English published from 2010 onward. These were supplemented by keyword-based searches in PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar and bibliographic searches. Studies assessing DTx in neuroscience (including neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders) were included. Details related to the publication, DTx, comparator, patient population, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed.
RESULTS
Our search criteria identified 461 neuroscience studies involving 213 unique DTx. Most DTx were extended reality based (86/213, 40.4%) or mobile device based (56/213, 26.3%); 313 were comparative, of which 68 (21.7%) used shams. The most common therapeutic areas assessed in these studies were stroke (42/213, 19.7%), depression (32/213, 15%), and anxiety (24/213, 11.3%). The most common treatments were cognitive behavioral therapy or behavioral therapy (67/213, 32.4%), physical rehabilitation (60/213, 28.2%), and cognitive training (41/213, 19.2%). We identified the following important issues related to the use of digital shams in neuroscience: shams were not validated before use in studies, they varied widely in design (from being nearly identical to the DTx to using different software programs altogether), and the level of patient engagement or satisfaction with the sham and the impact of the sham on study outcomes were infrequently reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Digital shams are critical for the clinical development of DTx in neuroscience. Given the importance of sham controls in evaluating DTx efficacy, we provide recommendations on the key information that should be reported in a well-designed DTx trial and propose an algorithm to allow the correct interpretation of DTx study results. Sham-controlled studies should be routinely used in DTx trials-in early-phase studies-to help identify DTx active components and-in late-phase studies-to confirm the efficacy of DTx. The use of shams early in development will ensure that the appropriate sham control is used in later confirmatory trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37874638
pii: v25i1e44764
doi: 10.2196/44764
pmc: PMC10630857
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e44764Informations de copyright
©Ernst Bos, Katrin H Preller, Gavneet Kaur, Pooja Malhotra, Saifuddin Kharawala, Dario Motti. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.10.2023.
Références
Trials. 2017 May 12;18(1):215
pubmed: 28494802
Stroke. 2014 Jun;45(6):1853-5
pubmed: 24763929
NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:
pubmed: 30854473
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):445-54
pubmed: 26173122
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 May;54(5):433-47
pubmed: 20537049
Sci Rep. 2017 May 23;7(1):2285
pubmed: 28536417
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 18;4:823977
pubmed: 36060538
Biol Psychol. 2017 Jul;127:148-156
pubmed: 28478138
Sleep Med. 2020 Aug;72:82-92
pubmed: 32559716
Sleep. 2021 Apr 9;44(4):
pubmed: 33249492
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2017 Apr-Jun;39(2):65-76
pubmed: 28700036
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Dec 11;3(1):159
pubmed: 33311567
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 Jul;42(4):385-401
pubmed: 23253641
Internet Interv. 2017 Aug 23;12:91-99
pubmed: 30135773
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e26292
pubmed: 33484240
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(2):113-27
pubmed: 25686052
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101548
pubmed: 32155470
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 02;19(11):e369
pubmed: 29097357
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):166
pubmed: 29859060
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 May;52(5):2357-2366
pubmed: 34060003
J Neurol. 2022 Mar;269(3):1209-1224
pubmed: 34018047
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Feb 11;4(1):20
pubmed: 33574573
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 06;10(4):e0121651
pubmed: 25844638
Mult Scler. 2021 Apr;27(5):778-789
pubmed: 32584155
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:444-451
pubmed: 30599367
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 27;11(1):e0147763
pubmed: 26816292
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Sep 24;15:746859
pubmed: 34630050
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):674-681
pubmed: 32175784
Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(6):341-350
pubmed: 29131090
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 May;56(5):566-76
pubmed: 25256627
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;71(6):455-464
pubmed: 28598701
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Apr;49(4):1727-1737
pubmed: 30569407
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;84(6):544-57
pubmed: 27018530
Games Health J. 2018 Aug;7(4):213-224
pubmed: 30106642
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 1;76(1):21-30
pubmed: 30264137
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Oct;19(5):492-501
pubmed: 27571889
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 23;18(3):e71
pubmed: 27009465
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 26;10:83
pubmed: 30863328
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;3(4):333-41
pubmed: 26827250
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Oct;98:103287
pubmed: 31518700
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Aug 20;44(5):1070-1080
pubmed: 29566206
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 27;3:110
pubmed: 32904379
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul;104(1):72-80
pubmed: 29377057
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2207-2213
pubmed: 32754475
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;55(3):247-55
pubmed: 24117656
Sleep. 2012 Jun 01;35(6):769-81
pubmed: 22654196
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 01;7(11):e017177
pubmed: 29196479
Alcohol Alcohol. 2017 Nov 01;52(6):671-676
pubmed: 29016711
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(1):45-46
pubmed: 28792816
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Feb 8;4(1):16
pubmed: 33558625
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e168-e178
pubmed: 33334505
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 27;11:434
pubmed: 32536880