Intraoperative application and early experience with novel high-resolution, high-channel-count thin-film electrodes for human microelectrocorticography.

cortical electrocorticography functional neurosurgery gamma band high resolution intraoperative mapping passive

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 28 04 2023
accepted: 18 07 2023
medline: 24 10 2023
pubmed: 24 10 2023
entrez: 24 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The study objective was to evaluate intraoperative experience with newly developed high-spatial-resolution microelectrode grids composed of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) with polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), and those composed of platinum nanorods (PtNRs). A cohort of patients who underwent craniotomy for pathological tissue resection and who had high-spatial-resolution microelectrode grids placed intraoperatively were evaluated. Patient demographic and baseline clinical variables as well as relevant microelectrode grid characteristic data were collected. The primary and secondary outcome measures of interest were successful microelectrode grid utilization with usable resting-state or task-related data, and grid-related adverse intraoperative events and/or grid dysfunction. Included in the analysis were 89 cases of patients who underwent a craniotomy for resection of neoplasms (n = 58) or epileptogenic tissue (n = 31). These cases accounted for 94 grids: 58 PEDOT:PSS and 36 PtNR grids. Of these 94 grids, 86 were functional and used successfully to obtain cortical recordings from 82 patients. The mean cortical grid recording duration was 15.3 ± 1.15 minutes. Most recordings in patients were obtained during experimental tasks (n = 52, 58.4%), involving language and sensorimotor testing paradigms, or were obtained passively during resting state (n = 32, 36.0%). There were no intraoperative adverse events related to grid placement. However, there were instances of PtNR grid dysfunction (n = 8) related to damage incurred by suboptimal preoperative sterilization (n = 7) and improper handling (n = 1); intraoperative recordings were not performed. Vaporized peroxide sterilization was the most optimal sterilization method for PtNR grids, providing a significantly greater number of usable channels poststerilization than did steam-based sterilization techniques (median 905.0 [IQR 650.8-935.5] vs 356.0 [IQR 18.0-597.8], p = 0.0031). High-spatial-resolution microelectrode grids can be readily incorporated into appropriately selected craniotomy cases for clinical and research purposes. Grids are reliable when preoperative handling and sterilization considerations are accounted for. Future investigations should compare the diagnostic utility of these high-resolution grids to commercially available counterparts and assess whether diagnostic discrepancies relate to clinical outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37874692
doi: 10.3171/2023.7.JNS23885
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Auteurs

Hao Tan (H)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Angelique C Paulk (AC)

2Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Brittany Stedelin (B)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Daniel R Cleary (DR)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Departments of4Neurological Surgery.

Caleb Nerison (C)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Youngbin Tchoe (Y)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.
6Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea.
10Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea.

Erik C Brown (EC)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
7Department of Neurological Surgery, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida.

Andrew Bourhis (A)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Samantha Russman (S)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Jihwan Lee (J)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Karen J Tonsfeldt (KJ)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.
8Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Science and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Jimmy C Yang (JC)

2Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Hongseok Oh (H)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.
9Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea.

Yun Goo Ro (YG)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.
9Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea.

Keundong Lee (K)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Mehran Ganji (M)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Ian Galton (I)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Dominic Siler (D)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Seunggu Jude Han (SJ)

12Department of Neurological Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

Kelly L Collins (KL)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
11Papé Family Pediatric Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and.

Sharona Ben-Haim (S)

Departments of4Neurological Surgery.

Eric Halgren (E)

13Neurology, University of California, San Diego, California.

Sydney S Cash (SS)

2Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Shadi Dayeh (S)

5Electrical and Computer Engineering, and.

Ahmed M Raslan (AM)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Classifications MeSH