Evaluation of the mandibular condyles trabecular structure in patients with severe class III pattern: a computed tomography (CT) fractal analysis study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 10 2023
24 10 2023
Historique:
received:
26
05
2023
accepted:
19
10
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
25
10
2023
entrez:
24
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Class III malocclusion is a combination of dental and skeletal disorders that causes discrepancies in occlusion. Malocclusion can affect the structure of the Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) resulting in many problems, one of which is affecting the internal structure of the bone. This study aimed to examine the morphological features of class III patients' trabecular structure of the mandibular condyle in comparison with normal class I individuals using fractal analysis (FA). To study the internal structure of the mandibular condyle bone, Computed Tomography (CT) scans of 45 severe class III patients (age: 16-46) who were the candidates for orthognathic surgery were selected and matched by age and sex with 45 normal class I individuals. The trabecular bone structure of the left and right mandibular condyles in three CT planes of the study group and control group were evaluated employing the FA. The result of the present study indicated that the fractal dimensions (FD) values of class III patients were lower than those of the normal class I individuals in axial (class I: 1.31 ± 0.02, class III: 1.28 ± 0.02), sagittal (class I: 1.25 ± 0.03, class III: 1.19 ± 0.08), and coronal (class I: 1.5 ± 0.06, class III: 1.45 ± 0.07) planes (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the FD values of the males and females. The intra-group evaluation revealed that there was no correlation between age and FD values. No evidence of laterality was found regarding the FD values of the right and left condyles. Given the noticeable differences between the FD values, it can be implied that severe class III malocclusion may affect the trabecular pattern of the cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle compared to class I individuals. Therefore, due to the altered trabecular structure, clinicians should be cautious when planning treatments for these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37875543
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45407-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-45407-6
pmc: PMC10598208
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18183Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Feb;49(2):20180457
pubmed: 31429597
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 May 01;51(4):20210365
pubmed: 34767466
Oral Radiol. 2022 Jan;38(1):139-146
pubmed: 34003449
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):32-42
pubmed: 23810043
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984 Sep;58(3):272-9
pubmed: 6592523
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov;124(5):530-40
pubmed: 14614421
Osteoporos Int. 1999;9(6):516-24
pubmed: 10624459
J Biomech Eng. 2015 Jan;137(1):
pubmed: 25392856
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022 Feb;133(2):229-237
pubmed: 34526250
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jul;148(1):22-36
pubmed: 26124025
Prog Orthod. 2018 Aug 2;19(1):28
pubmed: 30069814
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2000 Sep;1(1):25-30
pubmed: 15758521
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997 Oct;12(7-8):522-524
pubmed: 11415763
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Jan;41(1):24-9
pubmed: 22184625
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021 Spring;15(2):140-146
pubmed: 34386187
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Nov;35(6):393-7
pubmed: 17082328
Aust Dent J. 2014 Jun;59 Suppl 1:174-85
pubmed: 24611727
Neuroradiology. 2006 Nov;48(11):853-62
pubmed: 17009024
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 13;11(14):
pubmed: 35887815
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 3;19(1):71
pubmed: 33658030
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jul 01;18(4):e725-32
pubmed: 23722136
Med Hypotheses. 2018 Jul;116:136-138
pubmed: 29857898
Oral Radiol. 2023 Jan;39(1):191-197
pubmed: 35585223
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021 Sep;132(3):352-360
pubmed: 34210640
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:
pubmed: 26981751
Korean J Orthod. 2016 Sep;46(5):323-30
pubmed: 27668195
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023 Mar;135(3):427-432
pubmed: 36328893
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S276-S279
pubmed: 34447092
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008 Feb;11(1):43-50
pubmed: 18199079
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Jul;47 Suppl 4:iv9-16
pubmed: 18556648
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Mar;123(3):382-391
pubmed: 28110941
J Biomech. 2022 Jan;130:110889
pubmed: 34871896
Eur J Orthod. 2022 May 24;44(3):340-351
pubmed: 34562076
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):593-600
pubmed: 36259297
Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):783-793
pubmed: 33378509
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Dec;40(8):501-5
pubmed: 22065799
Front Physiol. 2020 Jan 31;10:1626
pubmed: 32082183
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2004 Jun;2(2):53-8
pubmed: 16036083
Korean J Orthod. 2017 May;47(3):151-157
pubmed: 28523241
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Oct;83(Suppl 1):102-110
pubmed: 35776177
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Nov;88(5):628-35
pubmed: 10556761
Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):948-55
pubmed: 23758599
Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):211-6
pubmed: 21208071
J Orthod Sci. 2017 Oct-Dec;6(4):123-128
pubmed: 29119092