A high diversity of non-target site resistance mechanisms to acetolactate-synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides has evolved within and among field populations of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.).
Acetolactate-synthase (ALS) inhibitor
Adaptive evolution
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Herbicide
Non-target-site resistance
RNA sequencing
Resistance detection
Transcriptomics
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2023
24 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
10
07
2023
accepted:
13
10
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
25
10
2023
entrez:
24
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-target site resistance (NTSR) to herbicides is a polygenic trait that threatens the chemical control of agricultural weeds. NTSR involves differential regulation of plant secondary metabolism pathways, but its precise genetic determinisms remain fairly unclear. Full-transcriptome sequencing had previously been implemented to identify NTSR genes. However, this approach had generally been applied to a single weed population, limiting our insight into the diversity of NTSR mechanisms. Here, we sought to explore the diversity of NTSR mechanisms in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) by investigating six field populations from different French regions where NTSR to acetolactate-synthase-inhibiting herbicides had evolved. A de novo transcriptome assembly (51,242 contigs, 80.2% completeness) was generated as a reference to seek genes differentially expressed between sensitive and resistant plants from the six populations. Overall, 4,609 constitutively differentially expressed genes were identified, of which none were common to all populations, and only 197 were shared by several populations. Similarly, population-specific transcriptomic response was observed when investigating early herbicide response. Gene ontology enrichment analysis highlighted the involvement of stress response and regulatory pathways, before and after treatment. The expression of 121 candidate constitutive NTSR genes including CYP71, CYP72, CYP94, oxidoreductase, ABC transporters, gluco and glycosyltransferases was measured in 220 phenotyped plants. Differential expression was validated in at least one ragweed population for 28 candidate genes. We investigated whether expression patterns at some combinations of candidate genes could predict phenotype. Within populations, prediction accuracy decreased when applied to an additional, independent plant sampling. Overall, a wide variety of genes linked to NTSR was identified within and among ragweed populations, of which only a subset was captured in our experiments. Our results highlight the complexity and the diversity of NTSR mechanisms that can evolve in a weed species in response to herbicide selective pressure. They strongly point to a non-redundant, population-specific evolution of NTSR to ALS inhibitors in ragweed. It also alerts on the potential of common ragweed for rapid adaptation to drastic environmental or human-driven selective pressures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Non-target site resistance (NTSR) to herbicides is a polygenic trait that threatens the chemical control of agricultural weeds. NTSR involves differential regulation of plant secondary metabolism pathways, but its precise genetic determinisms remain fairly unclear. Full-transcriptome sequencing had previously been implemented to identify NTSR genes. However, this approach had generally been applied to a single weed population, limiting our insight into the diversity of NTSR mechanisms. Here, we sought to explore the diversity of NTSR mechanisms in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) by investigating six field populations from different French regions where NTSR to acetolactate-synthase-inhibiting herbicides had evolved.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A de novo transcriptome assembly (51,242 contigs, 80.2% completeness) was generated as a reference to seek genes differentially expressed between sensitive and resistant plants from the six populations. Overall, 4,609 constitutively differentially expressed genes were identified, of which none were common to all populations, and only 197 were shared by several populations. Similarly, population-specific transcriptomic response was observed when investigating early herbicide response. Gene ontology enrichment analysis highlighted the involvement of stress response and regulatory pathways, before and after treatment. The expression of 121 candidate constitutive NTSR genes including CYP71, CYP72, CYP94, oxidoreductase, ABC transporters, gluco and glycosyltransferases was measured in 220 phenotyped plants. Differential expression was validated in at least one ragweed population for 28 candidate genes. We investigated whether expression patterns at some combinations of candidate genes could predict phenotype. Within populations, prediction accuracy decreased when applied to an additional, independent plant sampling. Overall, a wide variety of genes linked to NTSR was identified within and among ragweed populations, of which only a subset was captured in our experiments.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our results highlight the complexity and the diversity of NTSR mechanisms that can evolve in a weed species in response to herbicide selective pressure. They strongly point to a non-redundant, population-specific evolution of NTSR to ALS inhibitors in ragweed. It also alerts on the potential of common ragweed for rapid adaptation to drastic environmental or human-driven selective pressures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37875807
doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04524-0
pii: 10.1186/s12870-023-04524-0
pmc: PMC10594812
doi:
Substances chimiques
Herbicides
0
Acetolactate Synthase
EC 2.2.1.6
alpha-acetolactate
535-17-1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
510Subventions
Organisme : Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
ID : DRAGON 29001099-1944
Organisme : ACTA - Les instituts techniques agricoles
ID : DRAGON 29001099-1944
Organisme : Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail
ID : 2018-CRD-02 PPV18
Organisme : Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail
ID : 2018-CRD-02 PPV18
Organisme : Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail
ID : 2018-CRD-02 PPV18
Organisme : Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail
ID : 2018-CRD-02 PPV18
Organisme : Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail
ID : 2018-CRD-02 PPV18
Organisme : Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail
ID : 2018-CRD-02 PPV18
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2009 Mar 1;25(5):670-1
pubmed: 19153134
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008 Mar;46(3):309-24
pubmed: 18234503
New Phytol. 2009 Dec;184(4):783-93
pubmed: 19780985
PLoS One. 2013 May 16;8(5):e63576
pubmed: 23696834
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 4;103(14):5425-30
pubmed: 16567645
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2021 Jan;171:104738
pubmed: 33357560
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 18;8:1455
pubmed: 28868065
New Phytol. 2023 Mar;237(5):1891-1907
pubmed: 36457293
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
Plant J. 2014 Jun;78(5):865-76
pubmed: 24654891
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jan 10;5:18
pubmed: 22233533
Nature. 2000 Aug 3;406(6795):512-5
pubmed: 10952311
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 10;790:148034
pubmed: 34111793
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Dec 17;12:480
pubmed: 22177264
Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245-50
pubmed: 15289330
Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034
pubmed: 12184808
BMC Genomics. 2012 Jul 02;13:296
pubmed: 22748112
G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Aug 25;4(10):2035-47
pubmed: 25155274
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 7;11(1):19904
pubmed: 34620913
BMC Genomics. 2015 Aug 12;16:590
pubmed: 26265378
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 18;120(16):e2206808120
pubmed: 37043536
Plant Physiol. 2014 Apr 23;165(2):618-629
pubmed: 24760819
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 03;12:636652
pubmed: 33747015
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W116-20
pubmed: 15980438
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jun;36(10):3420-35
pubmed: 18445632
J Biol Chem. 2020 Jul 24;295(30):10307-10330
pubmed: 32430396
Nature. 2017 Jun 1;546(7656):148-152
pubmed: 28538728
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 May 2;66(17):4319-4327
pubmed: 29652484
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 1;31(19):3210-2
pubmed: 26059717
PLoS Genet. 2020 Feb 3;16(2):e1008593
pubmed: 32012153
Pest Manag Sci. 2013 Feb;69(2):176-87
pubmed: 22614948
Environ Int. 2013 Nov;61:115-26
pubmed: 24140540
Mol Ecol. 2005 Dec;14(14):4275-85
pubmed: 16313592
Plant Sci. 2022 Apr;317:111202
pubmed: 35193749
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0195488
pubmed: 29672568
Pest Manag Sci. 2015 Jun;71(6):824-8
pubmed: 25077812
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):225
pubmed: 30305027
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Oct;74(10):2260-2264
pubmed: 29222921
PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0176197
pubmed: 28489870
J Agric Food Chem. 2022 Sep 14;70(36):11429-11440
pubmed: 36048004
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Feb;74(2):275-281
pubmed: 28888062