Appropriate indications for laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy.


Journal

BMC surgery
ISSN: 1471-2482
Titre abrégé: BMC Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968567

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 23 06 2023
accepted: 28 09 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 25 10 2023
entrez: 24 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) has increased, but appropriate indications for LRH are unclear. This study aimed to clarify appropriate indications for LRH. We retrospectively compared surgical outcomes between open RH (ORH) (n = 57) and LRH (n = 40) groups. To detect difficult cases of complete pure LRH, we examined patients with unplanned intraoperative hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS)/open conversion (n = 6). In the LRH versus ORH group, as previous hepatectomy, laparoscopic (75% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (73% vs. 37%, p = 0.002) were more frequently performed, and as RH procedure, partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (88% vs. 47%, p = 0.0002) was more frequently performed. S1 tumor cases were higher in ORH group (11% vs. 0%), but S2-6 cases were higher in LRH group (73% vs. 49%) (p = 0.02). In LRH group, compared to the pure LRH patients, HALS/open conversion patients underwent significantly more previous hepatectomy with more than lobectomy (Hr2-3) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.033) and more RH procedures with segmentectomy (HrS) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.03). All LRH requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach were HALS conversions. Appropriate indications for LRH were previous hepatectomy was laparoscopic partial hepatectomy (Hr0), and RH procedure was partial hepatectomy (Hr0) for S2-6 tumor location. When RH is more than segmentectomy (HrS) requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach, planned HALS or ORH may be a better approach than pure LRH.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) has increased, but appropriate indications for LRH are unclear. This study aimed to clarify appropriate indications for LRH.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively compared surgical outcomes between open RH (ORH) (n = 57) and LRH (n = 40) groups. To detect difficult cases of complete pure LRH, we examined patients with unplanned intraoperative hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS)/open conversion (n = 6).
RESULTS RESULTS
In the LRH versus ORH group, as previous hepatectomy, laparoscopic (75% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (73% vs. 37%, p = 0.002) were more frequently performed, and as RH procedure, partial hepatectomy (Hr0) (88% vs. 47%, p = 0.0002) was more frequently performed. S1 tumor cases were higher in ORH group (11% vs. 0%), but S2-6 cases were higher in LRH group (73% vs. 49%) (p = 0.02). In LRH group, compared to the pure LRH patients, HALS/open conversion patients underwent significantly more previous hepatectomy with more than lobectomy (Hr2-3) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.033) and more RH procedures with segmentectomy (HrS) (33% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.03). All LRH requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach were HALS conversions.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Appropriate indications for LRH were previous hepatectomy was laparoscopic partial hepatectomy (Hr0), and RH procedure was partial hepatectomy (Hr0) for S2-6 tumor location. When RH is more than segmentectomy (HrS) requiring a repeat hepatic hilar approach, planned HALS or ORH may be a better approach than pure LRH.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37875912
doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02208-y
pii: 10.1186/s12893-023-02208-y
pmc: PMC10594730
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

322

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Itamoto T, Nakahara H, Amano H, Kohashi T, Ohdan H, Tashiro H, Asahara T. Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2007;141(5):589–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.014 pubmed: 17462458
Morise Z, Sugioka A, Fujita J, Hoshimoto S, Kato T, Hasumi A, Suda T, Negi H, Hattori Y, Sato H, Maeda K. Does repeated surgery improve the prognosis of colorectal liver metastases? J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.006 pubmed: 16368485
Petrowsky H, Gonen M, Jarnagin W, Lorenz M, DeMatteo R, Heinrich S, Encke A, Blumgart L, Fong Y. Second liver resections are safe and effective treatment for recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a bi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):863–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200206000-00015 .
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00015 pubmed: 12035044 pmcid: 1422517
Wu CC, Cheng SB, Yeh DC, Wang J, P’Eng FK. Second and third hepatectomies for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma are justified. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):1049–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6690 .
doi: 10.1002/bjs.6690 pubmed: 19672929
Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(5 Pt 2):956–8.
pubmed: 1833688
Shiroshita H, Inomata M, Akira S, Kanayama H, Yamaguchi S, Eguchi S, Wada N, Kurokawa Y, Uchida H, Seki Y, Ieiri S, Iwazaki M, Sato Y, Kitamura K, Tabata M, Mimata H, Takahashi H, Uemura T, Akagi T, Taniguchi F, Miyajima A, Hashizume M, Matsumoto S, Kitano S, Watanabe M, Sakai Y. Current status of endoscopic surgery in Japan: the 15th National Survey of endoscopic surgery by the Japan Society for endoscopic surgery. Asian J Endoscopic Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.13012 .
doi: 10.1111/ases.13012
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(10):745–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.166 .
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.166 pubmed: 25242563
Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B. Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):13–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002176 .
doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002176 pubmed: 28187043
Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5(4):281–9. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03 .
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03 pubmed: 27500140 pmcid: 4960417
Masuda T, Endo Y, Amano S, Kawamura M, Fujinaga A, Nakanuma H, Kawasaki T, Kawano Y, Hirashita T, Iwashita Y, Ohta M, Inomata M. Risk factors of unplanned intraoperative conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery or open surgery in laparoscopic liver resection. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02466-z .
doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02466-z pubmed: 36201022
Kinoshita M, Kanazawa A, Tanaka S, Takemura S, Amano R, Kimura K, Shinkawa H, Ohira G, Nishio K, Kubo S. Indications of laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12493 .
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12493 pubmed: 35634180 pmcid: 9130920
Morise Z, Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Ratti F, Belli A, Cherqui D, Tanabe M, Wakabayashi G, Cheung TT, Lo CM, Tanaka S, Kubo S, Okamura Y, Uesaka K, Monden K, Sadamori H, Hashida K, Kawamoto K, Gotohda N, Chen KH, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Ohmura Y, Ueno M, Ogura T, Suh KS, Kato Y, Sugioka A, Nitta H, Yasunaga M, Halium NA, Laurent A, Kaneko H, Otsuka Y, Kim KH, Cho HD, Lin CCW, Ome Y, Seyama Y, Troisi RI, Berardi G, Roteller F, Wilson GC, Geller DA, Soubrane O, Yoh T, Kaizu T, Kumamoto Y, Han HS, Ekmekcigil E, Dagher I, Fuks D, Gayet B, Buell JF, Ciria R, Briceno J, O’Rourke N, Lewin J, Edwin B, Shinoda M, Abe Y, Hilal MA, Alzoubi M. Laparoscopic repeat liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre propensity score-based study. Br J Surg. 2020;107(7):889–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11436 .
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11436 pubmed: 31994182
Onoe T, Yamaguchi M, Irei T, Ishiyama K, Sudo T, Hadano N, Kojima M, Kubota H, Ide R, Tazawa H, Shimizu W, Suzuki T, Shimizu Y, Hinoi T, Tashiro H. Feasibility and efficacy of repeat laparoscopic liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07246-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07246-3 pubmed: 31853630
Wakabayashi T, Felli E, Memeo R, Mascagni P, Abe Y, Kitagawa Y, Pessaux P. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic repeat liver resection after open liver resection: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(7):2083–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06754-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06754-6 pubmed: 30887184
Kaibori M, Ichihara N, Miyata H, Kakeji Y, Nanashima A, Kitagawa Y, Yamaue H, Yamamoto M, Endo I. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for liver cancers: a report from a nationwide surgical database in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022;29(8):833–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1156 .
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1156 pubmed: 35445565
Japan, LCSGo. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. Japanese J Surg. 1989;19(1):98–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02471576 .
doi: 10.1007/bf02471576
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Abu Hilal M, Berardi G, Ciria R, Abe Y, Aoki T, Asbun HJ, Chan ACY, Chanwat R, Chen KH, Chen Y, Cheung TT, Fuks D, Gotohda N, Han HS, Hasegawa K, Hatano E, Honda G, Itano O, Iwashita Y, Kaneko H, Kato Y, Kim JH, Liu R, Lopez-Ben S, Morimoto M, Monden K, Rotellar F, Sakamoto Y, Sugioka A, Yoshiizumi T, Akahoshi K, Alconchel F, Ariizumi S, Benedetti Cacciaquerra A, Duran M, Garcia Vazquez A, Golse N, Miyasaka Y, Mori Y, Ogiso S, Shirata C, Tomassini F, Urade T, Wakabayashi T, Nishino H, Hibi T, Kokudo N, Ohtsuka M, Ban D, Nagakawa Y, Ohtsuka T, Tanabe M, Nakamura M, Tsuchida A, Yamamoto M. (2021) The Tokyo 2020 terminology of liver anatomy and resections: updates of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1091 .
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae .
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae pubmed: 15273542 pmcid: 1360123
Kobayashi Y, Shindoh J, Igata Y, Okubo S, Hashimoto M. A novel scoring system for evaluating the difficulty of lysis of adhesion and surgical risk at repeat hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020;27(4):191–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.708 .
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.708 pubmed: 31944589
Okubo S, Shindoh J, Kobayashi Y, Matsumura M, Hashimoto M. Adhesions as a risk factor for postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy and the potential efficacy of adhesion barriers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1047 .
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1047 pubmed: 34541819 pmcid: 9292713
Shen Z, Cai J, Gao J, Zheng J, Tao L, Liang Y, Xu J, Liang X. Efficacy of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy compared with open repeat hepatectomy: a single-center, propensity score matching study. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02668-1 .
Kinoshita M, Kanazawa A, Kodai S, Shimizu S, Murata A, Nishio K, Hamano G, Shinkawa H, Tanaka S, Takemura S, Tsukamoto T, Kubo S. Difficulty classifications of laparoscopic repeated liver resection in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020;13(3):366–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12746 .
doi: 10.1111/ases.12746 pubmed: 31408275
Belli G, Cioffi L, Belli A, Fantini C, D′Agostino A, Russo G. Repeat liver surgery by laparoscopy for a malignant recurrence after previous open or laparoscopic resection. Hepatoma Res. 2015;1(1):30. https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-5079.153915 .
doi: 10.4103/2394-5079.153915

Auteurs

Takashi Masuda (T)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan. tmasuda@oita-u.ac.jp.

Yuichi Endo (Y)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Shota Amano (S)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Masahiro Kawamura (M)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Atsuro Fujinaga (A)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Takahide Kawasaki (T)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Yoko Kawano (Y)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Teijiro Hirashita (T)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Masayuki Ohta (M)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Masafumi Inomata (M)

Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka 1-1, Hasama-machi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH