Taking AIM at serious illness: implementing an access to investigational medicines expanded access program.

FDA expanded access access to investigational medicines compassionate use investigational medicines regulatory knowledge single patient IND

Journal

Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 01 09 2023
accepted: 15 09 2023
medline: 25 10 2023
pubmed: 25 10 2023
entrez: 25 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

When seriously ill patients have exhausted all treatment options available as part of usual care, the use of investigational agents may be warranted. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Expanded Access (EA) pathway provides a mechanism for these patient's physicians to pursue use of an investigational agent outside of a clinical trial when trial enrollment is not a feasible option. Though FDA has recently implemented processes to significantly streamline the regulatory portion of the process, the overall pathway has several time-consuming components including communication with the pharmaceutical company and the associated institutional requirements for EA use (contracting, Institutional Review Board [IRB], pharmacy, billing). Here, we present our experience building infrastructure at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) to support physicians and patients in pursuing EA, called the Access to Investigational Medicines (AIM) Platform, aligning the needs and responsibilities of institutional stakeholders and streamlining to ensure efficiency and regulatory compliance. Since its launch, the AIM team has experienced steady growth, supporting 40 EA cases for drugs/biologics, including both single patient cases and intermediate-size EA protocols in the emergent and non-emergent setting. As the EA pathway is a complex process that requires expert facilitation, we propose prioritizing EA support infrastructure at major academic medical centers as an essential regulatory knowledge function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37877021
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1287449
pmc: PMC10590908
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1287449

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Joly, Edwards, Jerome, Mainor, Bernard and Pulley.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Nov;17(11):e1719-e1727
pubmed: 33886355
Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):305-9
pubmed: 26445080
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Feb 26;5(1):e94
pubmed: 34192051
Acad Med. 2011 Feb;86(2):217-23
pubmed: 21169787
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 16;7(1):e4
pubmed: 36755539
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar 1;51(2):177-179
pubmed: 28553565
Regen Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):1979-1985
pubmed: 33023369

Auteurs

Meghan Morrison Joly (MM)

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Terri L Edwards (TL)

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Rebecca N Jerome (RN)

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Alex Mainor (A)

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Gordon R Bernard (GR)

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Jill M Pulley (JM)

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Classifications MeSH