Evaluation of the efficacy of using indocyanine green associated with fluorescence in sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
13
09
2022
accepted:
17
07
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
25
10
2023
entrez:
25
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the technique recommended for the axillary staging of patients with breast cancer in the initial stages without clinical axillary involvement. Three techniques are widely used globally to detect sentinel lymph nodes: patent blue, the radiopharmaceutical technetium 99 with gamma probe, and the combination of these two. To evaluate the sentinel lymph node detection rate with an innovative technique: indocyanine green (ICG) associated with fluorescence in breast cancer patients, and compare it with patent blue and a combination of patent blue and indocyanine green. 99 patients were sequentially (not randomly) allocated into 3 arms with 33 patients submitted to sentinel lymph node techniques. One arm underwent patent blue dying, the other indocyanine green, and the third received a combination of both. The detection rates between arms were compared. The detection rate in identifying the sentinel lymph node was 78.8% with patent blue, 93.9% with indocyanine green, and 100% with the combination. Indocyanine green identified two sentinel nodes in 48.5% of patients; the other groups more commonly had only one node identified. The mean time to sentinel lymph node identification was 20.6 ± 10.7 SD (standard deviation) minutes among patients submitted to the patent blue dye, 8.6 ± 6.6 minutes in the indocyanine green arm, and 10 ± 8.9 minutes in the combined group (P<0.001; Student's test). The mean surgery time was 69.4 ± 16.9; 55.1 ± 13.9; and 69.4 ± 19.3 minutes respectively (P<0.001; Student's test). The sentinel lymph node detection rate by fluorescence using indocyanine green was 93.9%, considered adequate. The rates using patent blue, indocyanine green, and patent blue plus indocyanine green (combined) were significantly different, and the indocyanine green alone is also acceptable, since it has a good performance in sentinel lymph node identification and it can avoid tattooing, with a 100% sentinel lymph node detection rate when combined with patent blue.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37878619
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273886
pii: PONE-D-22-22937
pmc: PMC10599532
doi:
Substances chimiques
Indocyanine Green
IX6J1063HV
Coloring Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0273886Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 da Silva Sá et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Surg Oncol. 1993 Dec;2(6):335-9; discussion 340
pubmed: 8130940
World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2815-2824
pubmed: 29404755
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
J Surg Res. 2015 Dec;199(2):287-93
pubmed: 26115807
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 18;13(1):e0191056
pubmed: 29346403
Br J Surg. 2018 Nov;105(12):1541-1552
pubmed: 30311642
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1394-1403
pubmed: 30143441
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jun;121(2):373-8
pubmed: 20140704
Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;29(4):709-719
pubmed: 35304711
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;117(8):1841-1847
pubmed: 29790178
Ophthalmology. 1994 Mar;101(3):529-33
pubmed: 8127574
Br J Cancer. 1957 Sep;11(3):359-77
pubmed: 13499785
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Dec;189(6):539-45
pubmed: 10589589
J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Mar;186(3):275-83
pubmed: 9510258
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926
pubmed: 28898379
Arq Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan-Mar;58(1):61-70
pubmed: 33909799
Breast Cancer. 2005;12(3):211-5
pubmed: 16110291
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 09;11(6):e0155597
pubmed: 27280407
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):e351-62
pubmed: 24988938
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):266-73
pubmed: 25637340
BJS Open. 2019 Mar 25;3(4):445-452
pubmed: 31388636
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;9(3):312-317
pubmed: 30287989
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):361-6
pubmed: 14998794
Surg Innov. 2016 Apr;23(2):166-75
pubmed: 26359355
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021 Jun 21;13:409-417
pubmed: 34188536
Ann Surg. 1994 Sep;220(3):391-8; discussion 398-401
pubmed: 8092905
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20;39(27):3056-3082
pubmed: 34279999
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):384-392
pubmed: 28159465
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(2):361-368
pubmed: 33761081
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug;26(8):1461-1468
pubmed: 33877488
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug 9;20(1):253
pubmed: 35941602
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;25(7):1783-1785
pubmed: 29671136
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):927-33
pubmed: 20863759
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(3):721-731
pubmed: 30879223
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;41(12):2159-2165
pubmed: 36383926