Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.

Arabic Dental caries Infodemiological study Quality Readability Web-based information

Journal

BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 10 2023
Historique:
received: 18 08 2023
accepted: 17 10 2023
medline: 27 10 2023
pubmed: 26 10 2023
entrez: 25 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Web-based information on dental caries in Arabic remains poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the quality and readability of web-based information about dental caries in Arabic. The first 100 websites in Arabic about dental caries were retrieved from Google and Bing using common terms. The websites were classified and evaluated for quality based on the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the DISCERN tool, and the presence of the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode). Readability was assessed using online readability indexes. A total of 102 Arabic websites were included. The JAMA benchmark score was low (m = 0.36, SD = 0.56), with 67.7% failing to meet any of the JAMA criteria. The DISCERN total score mean was 37.68 (SD = 7.99), with a majority (67.65%) of moderate quality. None of the websites had the HONcode. Readability was generally good, with 52.94% of websites having a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) < 7, 91.18% having a Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) < 7, and 85.29% having a Flesch reading ease (FRE) score ≥ 80. There was a positive correlation between JAMA and DISCERN scores (p < 0.001). DISCERN scores were positively correlated with the number of words (p < 0.001) and sentences (p = 0.004) on the websites. However, JAMA or DISCERN scores were not correlated with FKGL, SMOG, or FRE scores (p > 0.05). The quality of Arabic dental caries websites was found to be low, despite their readability. Efforts are needed to introduce more reliable sources for discussing dental caries and treatment options on sites aimed at Arabic populations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Web-based information on dental caries in Arabic remains poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the quality and readability of web-based information about dental caries in Arabic.
METHODS
The first 100 websites in Arabic about dental caries were retrieved from Google and Bing using common terms. The websites were classified and evaluated for quality based on the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the DISCERN tool, and the presence of the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode). Readability was assessed using online readability indexes.
RESULTS
A total of 102 Arabic websites were included. The JAMA benchmark score was low (m = 0.36, SD = 0.56), with 67.7% failing to meet any of the JAMA criteria. The DISCERN total score mean was 37.68 (SD = 7.99), with a majority (67.65%) of moderate quality. None of the websites had the HONcode. Readability was generally good, with 52.94% of websites having a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) < 7, 91.18% having a Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) < 7, and 85.29% having a Flesch reading ease (FRE) score ≥ 80. There was a positive correlation between JAMA and DISCERN scores (p < 0.001). DISCERN scores were positively correlated with the number of words (p < 0.001) and sentences (p = 0.004) on the websites. However, JAMA or DISCERN scores were not correlated with FKGL, SMOG, or FRE scores (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The quality of Arabic dental caries websites was found to be low, despite their readability. Efforts are needed to introduce more reliable sources for discussing dental caries and treatment options on sites aimed at Arabic populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37880640
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03547-1
pii: 10.1186/s12903-023-03547-1
pmc: PMC10601140
doi:

Substances chimiques

Smog 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

797

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):232
pubmed: 37081436
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):41
pubmed: 33541345
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jul 17;6(3):e19354
pubmed: 32640418
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(8):864-874
pubmed: 28581891
Health Info Libr J. 2017 Dec;34(4):268-283
pubmed: 29045011
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017 Spring;31(2):147-151
pubmed: 28437511
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 19;19(1):e9
pubmed: 28104579
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 26;117(21):11220-11222
pubmed: 32366658
Health Info Libr J. 2022 Sep;39(3):207-224
pubmed: 36046959
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11
pubmed: 10396471
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Oct 21;5(4):e25
pubmed: 27769954
BMC Rheumatol. 2020 Nov 24;4(1):61
pubmed: 33292857
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281908
pubmed: 36795745
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jun;81(6):363-73
pubmed: 22217800
J Health Commun. 2010 Mar;15(2):152-66
pubmed: 20390984
Br Dent J. 2009 Dec 19;207(12):583-6; 575
pubmed: 20019727
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 13;16(5):e128
pubmed: 24824164
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 07;16(10):e224
pubmed: 25348028
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1276-80
pubmed: 25041413
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6
pubmed: 24178035
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jul 1;24(4):e461-e467
pubmed: 31246939
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011 Jul;25(7):445-9
pubmed: 21682586
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:433-451
pubmed: 31874069
Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9780317
pubmed: 28656111
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Mar;23(1):15-20
pubmed: 35274537
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Sep 1;100(9):544-561
pubmed: 36062247
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:53-7
pubmed: 21893713
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Nov 12;1(1):e32127
pubmed: 34841200
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Apr 01;21(4):961-966
pubmed: 32334456
Appl Nurs Res. 1996 Aug;9(3):139-43
pubmed: 8771859
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e17
pubmed: 14517108
J Dent Res. 2018 May;97(5):501-507
pubmed: 29342371
Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Feb 26;35(1):62–67
pubmed: 33651024
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):956-960
pubmed: 33568578
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 13;19(12):e415
pubmed: 29237585
J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 Sep;45(8):617-20
pubmed: 27233229
JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244-5
pubmed: 9103351

Auteurs

Khalid Aboalshamat (K)

Dental Public Health Division, Preventative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. ktaboalshamat@uqu.edu.sa.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH