Evaluation of the accuracy of the Asanté assay as a point-of-care rapid test for HIV-1 recent infections using serum bank specimens from blood donors in South Africa, July 2018 - August 2021.


Journal

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde
ISSN: 2078-5135
Titre abrégé: S Afr Med J
Pays: South Africa
ID NLM: 0404520

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 10 2023
Historique:
received: 16 01 2023
medline: 27 10 2023
pubmed: 26 10 2023
entrez: 26 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Point-of-care (POC) rapid recency testing can be used as a cost-effective tool to identify recently infected individuals (i.e. infected within the last 12 months) in near-real time, support epidemic control and identify hotspots for transmission as part of recent infection surveillance. To evaluate the performance of the Asanté (HIV-1) rapid recency assay as a POC rapid test among blood donors in South Africa (SA). The study was a cross-sectional and validity study of the Asanté HIV-1 Rapid Recency Assay performed on 715 consecutively archived plasma donor specimens from the SA National Blood Services to determine their recency and established HIV infection status. ELISA and rapid assays for HIV antibody detection were used as the reference-testing standard for confirming an infection, while the Maxim HIV-1 limiting antigen (LAg) avidity assay was used as a reference for comparing HIV recency status. Validity tests (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) and Cohen-Kappa tests of the agreement were conducted to compare the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay results with the reference tests. Of the 715 studied blood samples, 63.1% (n=451/715) were confirmed to be HIV-positive based on the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay in diagnosing established HIV infection compared to the ELISA were 98.4% (95% CI 96.7 - 99.3) and 99.6% (95% CI 97.6 - 100), respectively. Compared with HIV rapid assay, the sensitivity and specificity of the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay was 98.7% (95% CI 97.0 - 99.4) and 99.2% (95% CI 97.1 - 100), respectively. Of the 451 HIV-positive blood samples, 43% were confirmed as recent HIV infections by the Maxim HIV-1 LAg avidity assay. There was high agreement between the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay and the Maxim HIV-1 LAg avidity assay (94.1%, k=0.879, p<0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of the Asante HIV-1 assay was 89.4% (95% CI 84.0 - 93.0) and 97.7% (95% CI 94.8 - 99.0), respectively. The Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay test results demonstrated high accuracy (>90%) compared with the HIV ELISA and rapid assays for determining established infection and the Maxim HIV-1 LAg avidity assay for classifying recent HIV-1 infections. The assay's sensitivity for established infections was below the World Health Organization criteria (<99%) for POC devices. The Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay can be used to distinguish between recent and long-term infections, but may not be considered a POC test for determining HIV infection.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Point-of-care (POC) rapid recency testing can be used as a cost-effective tool to identify recently infected individuals (i.e. infected within the last 12 months) in near-real time, support epidemic control and identify hotspots for transmission as part of recent infection surveillance.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the performance of the Asanté (HIV-1) rapid recency assay as a POC rapid test among blood donors in South Africa (SA).
METHODS
The study was a cross-sectional and validity study of the Asanté HIV-1 Rapid Recency Assay performed on 715 consecutively archived plasma donor specimens from the SA National Blood Services to determine their recency and established HIV infection status. ELISA and rapid assays for HIV antibody detection were used as the reference-testing standard for confirming an infection, while the Maxim HIV-1 limiting antigen (LAg) avidity assay was used as a reference for comparing HIV recency status. Validity tests (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) and Cohen-Kappa tests of the agreement were conducted to compare the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay results with the reference tests.
RESULTS
Of the 715 studied blood samples, 63.1% (n=451/715) were confirmed to be HIV-positive based on the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay in diagnosing established HIV infection compared to the ELISA were 98.4% (95% CI 96.7 - 99.3) and 99.6% (95% CI 97.6 - 100), respectively. Compared with HIV rapid assay, the sensitivity and specificity of the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay was 98.7% (95% CI 97.0 - 99.4) and 99.2% (95% CI 97.1 - 100), respectively. Of the 451 HIV-positive blood samples, 43% were confirmed as recent HIV infections by the Maxim HIV-1 LAg avidity assay. There was high agreement between the Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay and the Maxim HIV-1 LAg avidity assay (94.1%, k=0.879, p<0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of the Asante HIV-1 assay was 89.4% (95% CI 84.0 - 93.0) and 97.7% (95% CI 94.8 - 99.0), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay test results demonstrated high accuracy (>90%) compared with the HIV ELISA and rapid assays for determining established infection and the Maxim HIV-1 LAg avidity assay for classifying recent HIV-1 infections. The assay's sensitivity for established infections was below the World Health Organization criteria (<99%) for POC devices. The Asanté HIV-1 rapid recency assay can be used to distinguish between recent and long-term infections, but may not be considered a POC test for determining HIV infection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37881912
doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i10.678
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

42-48

Auteurs

B Singh (B)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, South Africa. beverleys@nicd.ac.za.

J Mthombeni (J)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, South Africa. julianm@uj.ac.za.

G Olorunfemi (G)

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. drgbengafemi@yahoo.co.uk.

M Goosen (M)

National Institute for Communicable Diseases/National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa. markg@nicd.ac.za.

E Cutler (E)

National Institute for Communicable Diseases/National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa. ewaldec@nicd.ac.za.

H Julius (H)

National Institute for Communicable Diseases/National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa. henryj@nicd.ac.za.

Z Brukwe (Z)

National Institute for Communicable Diseases/National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa. zinhleb@nicd.ac.za.

A Puren (A)

3 National Institute for Communicable Diseases/National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa; Division of Virology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. adrianp@nicd.ac.za.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH