A Survey Study on Knowledge and Attitude Toward the Ethics Committee and Research Ethical Practices Among Researchers From Kuwait.
Awareness
Ethical principles
Ethics committee
Informed consent
Knowledge
Misconduct
Journal
Science and engineering ethics
ISSN: 1471-5546
Titre abrégé: Sci Eng Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516228
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 10 2023
26 10 2023
Historique:
received:
26
09
2021
accepted:
05
10
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
26
10
2023
entrez:
26
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The integrity of research findings and the safety of participants who voluntarily consent to participate in research studies must be assured through ethical approaches. Additionally, ethical guidelines and the ethics committee protect participants from unfair practices by the research team. Therefore, this study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes toward the ethics committee and research ethical practices among the researchers of a diabetes institute in Kuwait. An anonymous survey was conducted through an online questionnaire using Microsoft Forms. The study had a response rate of 86%. Among the 55 participants in this study, 43 (78%) had ethics training. Researchers involved in more than four research projects were shown to have a much higher awareness of the ethics committee and its role than researchers involved in no projects. Approximately 90% of researchers had training in research ethics and were knowledgeable about informed consent forms and assent, as well as additional protections for vulnerable populations. Ninety-eight percent of respondents were of the view that an ethics committee was necessary. Our study concluded that most of the researchers at the institute were aware of the role of the ethics committee, and ethical principles. However, we recommend that continuous and customized training on research ethics should be provided.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37882890
doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00458-w
pii: 10.1007/s11948-023-00458-w
pmc: PMC10602982
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
37Subventions
Organisme : Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences
ID : RA HM-2019-029
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Gen Med. 2019 Apr 10;12:141-145
pubmed: 31114291
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 14;21(1):39
pubmed: 32410707
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Oct;83(4):743-7
pubmed: 20889858
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):356-67
pubmed: 24452044
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):25-35
pubmed: 25747688
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Dec 12;13:34
pubmed: 23234422
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jun 05;14:23
pubmed: 23738971
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 21;20(1):121
pubmed: 32316962
J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):330-3
pubmed: 11055034
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):704-10
pubmed: 23712082
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):816-23
pubmed: 19228627
Clin Investig (Lond). 2015;5(2):161-173
pubmed: 25729561
Account Res. 2012;19(6):329-43
pubmed: 23074991
J Acad Ethics. 2018 Mar;16(1):71-87
pubmed: 29755305
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:694759
pubmed: 21754933
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):40-51
pubmed: 24384515
Perspect Clin Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):91-94
pubmed: 29862202
PLoS One. 2008 May 07;3(5):e2094
pubmed: 18461183
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206702
pubmed: 30383802
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Nov 1;96(11):792-793
pubmed: 30455534
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):821-831
pubmed: 31571048
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0127556
pubmed: 26083381