Biweekly vs Triweekly Cabazitaxel in Older Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The CABASTY Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Oct 2023
26 Oct 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
26
10
2024
medline:
26
10
2023
pubmed:
26
10
2023
entrez:
26
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Many patients 65 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are denied taxane chemotherapy because this treatment is considered unsuitable. To determine whether biweekly cabazitaxel (CBZ), 16 mg/m2 (biweekly CBZ16), plus prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at each cycle reduces the risk of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications (eg, febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infection, or sepsis) compared with triweekly CBZ, 25 mg/m2 (triweekly CBZ25), plus G-CSF (standard regimen). A total of 196 patients 65 years or older with progressive mCRPC were enrolled in this prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted in France (18 centers) and Germany (7 centers) between May 5, 2017, and January 7, 2021. All patients had received docetaxel and at least 1 novel androgen receptor-targeted agent. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive biweekly CBZ16 plus G-CSF and daily prednisolone (experimental group) or triweekly CBZ25 plus G-CSF and daily prednisolone (control group). The primary end point was the occurrence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia measured at nadir and/or neutropenic complications. Among 196 patients (97 in the triweekly CBZ25 group and 99 in the biweekly CBZ16 group), the median (IQR) age was 74.6 (70.4-79.3) years, and 181 (92.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 31.3 (22.5-37.5) months. Relative dose intensities were comparable between groups (median [IQR], 92.7% [83.7%-98.9%] in the triweekly CBZ25 group vs 92.8% [87.0%-98.9%] in the biweekly CBZ16 group). The rate of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications was significantly higher with triweekly CBZ25 vs biweekly CBZ16 (60 of 96 [62.5%] vs 5 of 98 [5.1%]; odds ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.08; P < .001). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common with triweekly CBZ25 (70 of 96 [72.9%]) vs biweekly CBZ16 (55 of 98 [56.1%]). One patient (triweekly CBZ25 group) died of a neutropenic complication. In this randomized clinical trial, compared with the standard regimen, biweekly CBZ16 plus G-CSF significantly reduced by 12-fold the occurrence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications, with comparable clinical outcomes. The findings suggest that biweekly CBZ16 regimen should be offered to patients 65 years or older with mCRPC for whom the standard regimen is unsuitable. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02961257.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37883073
pii: 2811046
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4255
pmc: PMC10603579
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02961257']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20;33(12):1356-63
pubmed: 25624432
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Jan;20(1):71-90
pubmed: 34991070
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Mar;56:93-100
pubmed: 26829012
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3198-3206
pubmed: 28809610
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2506-2518
pubmed: 31566937
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:116-136
pubmed: 31195356
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):228-35
pubmed: 24837187
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1148-59
pubmed: 18309951
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1532-1542
pubmed: 29033099
J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Apr;5(2):119-26
pubmed: 24495703
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;14:17588359221100022
pubmed: 35677318
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):2166-2172
pubmed: 22250183
Anticancer Res. 2020 Dec;40(12):6915-6921
pubmed: 33288585
Urol Oncol. 2018 Nov;36(11):500.e1-500.e9
pubmed: 30201382
Future Oncol. 2011 Apr;7(4):497-506
pubmed: 21463139
BJU Int. 2018 Feb;121(2):203-208
pubmed: 28370882
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Jun 19;:
pubmed: 28729067
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):263-282
pubmed: 33039206
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(1):8-32
pubmed: 21095116
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 16;385(12):1091-1103
pubmed: 34161051
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2562-9
pubmed: 26278646
Urol Oncol. 2016 May;34(5):234.e21-9
pubmed: 26777260
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):117-24
pubmed: 23294853
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):981-985
pubmed: 25484141
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Am J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug;31(4):369-74
pubmed: 18845996
Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54
pubmed: 20888992
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Apr;50(6):1090-9
pubmed: 24485664
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e404-14
pubmed: 25079103
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Dec 22;12:19-28
pubmed: 28053513
Acta Oncol. 2022 Aug;61(8):963-971
pubmed: 35847998
Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):497-506
pubmed: 34274136
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;125:153-163
pubmed: 31787484
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3189-3197
pubmed: 28753384