Sustained Survival Benefit in Recurrent Medulloblastoma by a Metronomic Antiangiogenic Regimen: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Oct 2023
26 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline:
26
10
2023
pubmed:
26
10
2023
entrez:
26
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Medulloblastoma recurrence in patients who have previously received irradiation has a dismal prognosis and lacks a standard salvage regimen. To evaluate the response rate of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma recurrence using an antiangiogenic metronomic combinatorial approach (Medulloblastoma European Multitarget Metronomic Anti-Angiogenic Trial [MEMMAT]). This phase 2, investigator-initiated, multicenter nonrandomized controlled trial assessed 40 patients with relapsed or refractory medulloblastoma without a ventriculoperitoneal shunt who were younger than 20 years at original diagnosis. Patients were enrolled between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2021. Treatment consisted of daily oral thalidomide, fenofibrate, celecoxib, and alternating 21-day cycles of low-dose (metronomic) oral etoposide and cyclophosphamide, supplemented by intravenous bevacizumab and intraventricular therapy consisting of alternating etoposide and cytarabine. The primary end point was response after 6 months of antiangiogenic metronomic therapy. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life. Adverse events were monitored to assess safety. Of the 40 patients (median [range] age at treatment start, 10 [4-17] years; 25 [62.5%] male) prospectively enrolled, 23 (57.5%) achieved disease control after 6 months of treatment, with a response detected in 18 patients (45.0%). Median OS was 25.5 months (range, 10.9-40.0 months), and median PFS was 8.5 months (range, 1.7-15.4 months). Mean (SD) PFS at both 3 and 5 years was 24.6% (7.9%), while mean (SD) OS at 3 and 5 years was 43.6% (8.5%) and 22.6% (8.8%), respectively. No significant differences in PFS or OS were evident based on molecular subgroup analysis or the number of prior recurrences. In patients demonstrating a response, mean (SD) overall 5-year PFS was 49.7% (14.3%), and for patients who remained progression free for the first 12 months of treatment, mean (SD) 5-year PFS was 66.7% (16.1%). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events included myelosuppression, infections, seizures, and headaches. One heavily pretreated patient with a third recurrence died of secondary acute myeloid leukemia. This feasible and well-tolerated MEMMAT combination regimen demonstrated promising activity in patients with previously irradiated recurrent medulloblastoma. Given these results, this predominantly oral, well-tolerated, and outpatient treatment warrants further evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01356290.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37883081
pii: 2811045
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4437
pmc: PMC10603581
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01356290']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Apr;54(4):649-51
pubmed: 20146223
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Apr;61(4):636-42
pubmed: 24123865
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Apr;123(4):465-72
pubmed: 22134537
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Jan;67(1):e28032
pubmed: 31595663
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;41(10):1921-1932
pubmed: 36548930
Qual Life Res. 1998 Jul;7(5):399-407
pubmed: 9691720
Oncology. 2012;82(5):249-60
pubmed: 22538363
J Neurooncol. 2019 Oct;145(1):107-114
pubmed: 31468270
Trends Cancer. 2020 Oct;6(10):819-828
pubmed: 32601045
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Sep;67(9):e28508
pubmed: 32658380
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jun;14(6):1922-7
pubmed: 8656261
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Sep;59(3):511-7
pubmed: 22147459
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):222-8
pubmed: 9440746
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 29;111(30):11127-32
pubmed: 25024195
Exp Ther Med. 2010 Sep;1(5):739-746
pubmed: 22993597
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;14(1):
pubmed: 35008290
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):4082-5
pubmed: 7513432
Cancer. 2007 Jul 1;110(1):156-63
pubmed: 17541945
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Sep;15(9):1236-43
pubmed: 23857707
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 22;105(3):985-90
pubmed: 18199835
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 18;14(3):
pubmed: 35158738
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jun;19(6):768-784
pubmed: 29778738
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):807-821
pubmed: 33502920
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;14(20):
pubmed: 36291912
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):958-971
pubmed: 28545823
Acta Paediatr. 2016 Aug;105(8):946-51
pubmed: 26801815
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Dec;4(12):865-874
pubmed: 33222802
J Neurooncol. 2016 Sep;129(3):515-524
pubmed: 27423645
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 27;13(1):
pubmed: 33375523
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1200-7
pubmed: 24140199
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jun;47(9):1389-97
pubmed: 21474302
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Jan 23;6(1):7
pubmed: 31974366
Onkologie. 2006 Jul;29(7):308-13
pubmed: 16874014
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251
pubmed: 34185076
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Jan;29(1):32-41
pubmed: 17544337
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007 May;56(5):641-8
pubmed: 16960692
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Feb;37(2):303-314
pubmed: 33665752
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Sep 6;24(Suppl 3):iii1-iii38
pubmed: 36066969
Cancer Res. 2000 Apr 1;60(7):1878-86
pubmed: 10766175
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Aug;138(2):309-326
pubmed: 31076851
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005 Nov;27(11):573-81
pubmed: 16282886
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Aug;68(8):e29031
pubmed: 33844469