Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 02 2023
accepted: 03 10 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 26 10 2023
entrez: 26 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Quantifying the relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton may offer insight into zooplankton sensitivity to shifting phytoplankton assemblages and the potential impacts of producer-consumer decoupling on the rest of the food web. We analyzed 18 years (2001-2018) of paired phytoplankton and zooplankton samples collected as part of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Great Lakes Biology Monitoring Program to examine both the long-term and seasonal relationships between zooplankton and phytoplankton across all five Laurentian Great Lakes. We also analyzed effects of phytoplankton diversity on zooplankton biomass, diversity, and predator-prey (zooplanktivore/grazer) ratios. Across the Great Lakes, there was a weak positive correlation between total algal biovolume and zooplankton biomass in both spring and summer. The relationship was weaker and not consistently positive within individual lakes. These trends were consistent over time, providing no evidence of increasing decoupling over the study period. Zooplankton biomass was weakly negatively correlated with algal diversity across lakes, whereas zooplankton diversity was unaffected. These relationships did not change when we considered only the edible phytoplankton fraction, possibly due to the high correlation between total and edible phytoplankton biovolume in most of these lakes. Lack of strong coupling between these producer and consumer assemblages may be related to lagging responses by the consumers, top-down effects from higher-level consumers, or other confounding factors. These results underscore the difficulty in predicting higher trophic level responses, including zooplankton, from changes in phytoplankton assemblages.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37883482
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292988
pii: PONE-D-23-03077
pmc: PMC10602272
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0292988

Informations de copyright

Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):5134-8
pubmed: 18375765
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2719-27
pubmed: 23431601
Nature. 2004 Aug 19;430(7002):881-4
pubmed: 15318219
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7780):667-670
pubmed: 31610543
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12788-93
pubmed: 19620720
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2561-9
pubmed: 16321776
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Aug;25(8):2544-2559
pubmed: 31152499
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):e101-e111
pubmed: 28871605
J Great Lakes Res. 2018;44(4):573-589
pubmed: 31156289
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 09;8:15713
pubmed: 28598413
Harmful Algae. 2020 Feb;92:101586
pubmed: 32113601
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 25;13(1):4990
pubmed: 36008387
Science. 2015 Sep 4;349(6252):aac6284
pubmed: 26339034
Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):402-12
pubmed: 17479758
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep;3(9):1351-1358
pubmed: 31427731
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 8;7(1):11035
pubmed: 28887516
ISME J. 2018 Jun;12(6):1532-1542
pubmed: 29703955
Ecol Lett. 2014 Apr;17(4):464-74
pubmed: 24467318
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 14;16(10):e0258342
pubmed: 34648532
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8392
pubmed: 35589855
Nature. 2004 Jun 24;429(6994):863-7
pubmed: 15215862

Auteurs

Katya E Kovalenko (KE)

Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, United States of America.

Euan D Reavie (ED)

Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, United States of America.

Stephanie Figary (S)

Department of Natural Resources and Cornell Biological Field Station, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.

Lars G Rudstam (LG)

Department of Natural Resources and Cornell Biological Field Station, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.

James M Watkins (JM)

Department of Natural Resources and Cornell Biological Field Station, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.

Anne Scofield (A)

U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Christopher T Filstrup (CT)

Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH