Secondary postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine scar dehiscence, a case report.

Caesarean section Case report Postpartum hemorrhage Postpartum period Surgical wound dehiscence

Journal

International journal of surgery case reports
ISSN: 2210-2612
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg Case Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101529872

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 05 09 2023
revised: 22 09 2023
accepted: 23 09 2023
medline: 27 10 2023
pubmed: 27 10 2023
entrez: 26 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Secondary postpartum hemorrhage is rare. The most common cause is retained placenta. Having a uterine scar dehiscence as an etiology is unusual. Complete dehiscence of the uterine scar is even rarer. This rare but serious cause of post-partum haemorrhage can be potentially life threatening due to severe hemorrhage if not managed in adequate time. We present the case of a 35-year-old patient, gravida 2 para 2. She had undergone two caesarean sections in our department and, after the last one in March 2021, she presented twice to our emergency department with relatively abundant metrorrhagia, but neither the clinical nor the radiological examinations revealed any abnormalities. At 43 days postpartum, she presented to the emergency with severe bleeding per vaginum. The bleeding was profuse, causing hemodynamic instability and severe acute anaemia. An explorative laparotomy was necessary to diagnose the etiology and manage the treatment. Surgical exploration revealed a lateral uterine rupture in the broad ligament and complete dislocation of the caesarean scar. An urgent hysterectomy was performed. Partial or complete dehiscence of the hysterorrhoea is a rare cause of secondary postpartum hemorrhage after caesarean section. When hysterorrhaphy dehiscence does occur, the origin of the bleeding is likely to be related to erosion of the vessels at the incision angles. The diagnosis of partial or complete dehiscence of the uterine scar may be misleading in the absence of specific clinical or radiological signs. This condition must therefore be considered and suspected in cases of secondary postpartum hemorrhage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37883876
pii: S2210-2612(23)01012-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108883
pmc: PMC10667773
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

108883

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declared they have no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Dec;71(6):629-632
pubmed: 34898902
JSLS. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):156-60
pubmed: 23743391
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 1;17(3):e0264583
pubmed: 35231065
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:154685
pubmed: 22720176
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;9:69-71
pubmed: 25728672
Case Rep Womens Health. 2020 Apr 14;27:e00203
pubmed: 32346520
Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):1265-1269
pubmed: 34309465
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):305-323
pubmed: 33417319
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:226-230
pubmed: 33181358

Auteurs

Fathi Mraihi (F)

D Department at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia. Electronic address: mraihi.fethi@gmail.com.

Jihene Basly (J)

D Department at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Amani Mezni (A)

D Department at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Zeineb Ghali (Z)

D Department at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Montasar Hafsi (M)

D Department at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Dalenda Chelli (D)

D Department at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Classifications MeSH