lmeEEG: Mass linear mixed-effects modeling of EEG data with crossed random effects.

Crossed random effects EEG Linear mixed-effects models Mass-univariate testing Psycholinguistics TFCE

Journal

Journal of neuroscience methods
ISSN: 1872-678X
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci Methods
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7905558

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 29 06 2023
revised: 26 09 2023
accepted: 21 10 2023
medline: 5 12 2023
pubmed: 27 10 2023
entrez: 26 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Mixed-effects models are the current standard for the analysis of behavioral studies in psycholinguistics and related fields, given their ability to simultaneously model crossed random effects for subjects and items. However, they are hardly applied in neuroimaging and psychophysiology, where the use of mass univariate analyses in combination with permutation testing would be too computationally demanding to be practicable with mixed models. Here, we propose and validate an analytical strategy that enables the use of linear mixed models (LMM) with crossed random intercepts in mass univariate analyses of EEG data (lmeEEG). It avoids the unfeasible computational costs that would arise from massive permutation testing with LMM using a simple solution: removing random-effects contributions from EEG data and performing mass univariate linear analysis and permutations on the obtained marginal EEG. lmeEEG showed excellent performance properties in terms of power and false positive rate. lmeEEG overcomes the computational costs of standard available approaches (our method was indeed more than 300 times faster). lmeEEG allows researchers to use mixed models with EEG mass univariate analyses. Thanks to the possibility offered by the method described here, we anticipate that LMM will become increasingly important in neuroscience. Data and codes are available at osf.io/kw87a. The codes and a tutorial are also available at github.com/antovis86/lmeEEG.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mixed-effects models are the current standard for the analysis of behavioral studies in psycholinguistics and related fields, given their ability to simultaneously model crossed random effects for subjects and items. However, they are hardly applied in neuroimaging and psychophysiology, where the use of mass univariate analyses in combination with permutation testing would be too computationally demanding to be practicable with mixed models.
NEW METHOD METHODS
Here, we propose and validate an analytical strategy that enables the use of linear mixed models (LMM) with crossed random intercepts in mass univariate analyses of EEG data (lmeEEG). It avoids the unfeasible computational costs that would arise from massive permutation testing with LMM using a simple solution: removing random-effects contributions from EEG data and performing mass univariate linear analysis and permutations on the obtained marginal EEG.
RESULTS RESULTS
lmeEEG showed excellent performance properties in terms of power and false positive rate.
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS METHODS
lmeEEG overcomes the computational costs of standard available approaches (our method was indeed more than 300 times faster).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
lmeEEG allows researchers to use mixed models with EEG mass univariate analyses. Thanks to the possibility offered by the method described here, we anticipate that LMM will become increasingly important in neuroscience. Data and codes are available at osf.io/kw87a. The codes and a tutorial are also available at github.com/antovis86/lmeEEG.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37884082
pii: S0165-0270(23)00210-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109991
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109991

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Antonino Visalli (A)

IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy. Electronic address: antonino.visalli@hsancamillo.it.

Maria Montefinese (M)

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Giada Viviani (G)

Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Livio Finos (L)

Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Antonino Vallesi (A)

Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Ettore Ambrosini (E)

Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH