Sustained Retention, Viral Load Suppression and their Determinants Among Clients on HAART Enrolled Under Differentiated Service Delivery Models in Eastern Uganda.

Differentiated Service Delivery models Eastern Uganda HIV/AIDS Retention in care Viral load suppression

Journal

Research square
Titre abrégé: Res Sq
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768035

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Oct 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 27 10 2023
medline: 27 10 2023
entrez: 27 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although Uganda rolled out Differentiated Service Delivery(DSD) models in June 2017 to improve retention and viral load suppression rates among clients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART), these have remained low relative to the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS(UNAIDs) targets of achieving 95% population with HIV tested, 95% of tested positive clients for HIV to be on Highly active Antiretroviral therapy and 95% of clients On Antiretroviral therapy be suppressing by 2030(95-95-95 UNAIDS targets). The purpose of this study was to determine sustained retention, viral load suppression and their determinants among clients on HAART enrolled under different Differentiated service delivery models in Katakwi district in Eastern Uganda. A retrospective cohort study of clients enrolled on HAART in the different approaches of DSD who were active by 2017 and followed up to 2020 was done. The primary outcomes included sustained retention, viral load suppression and their determinants among clients HAART in different DSD approaches. Eight health facilities providing HAART services were purposively sampled and 771 clients on HAART were sampled out by simple random selection from a total population of 4742 clients on HAART in Katakwi district. We analysed retention, viral load suppression rates, and their determinants by logistic regression method using STATA. A total of 771 participants were sampled of whom 42.7% were male and 57.3% were female, with the mean age being 40 years. Retention rates at 95% CI of participants were 99.35% at 12 months, 94.03 at 24 months, 89.88% at 36 months and 84.57% at 48 months. The viral load suppression rates were 57.3% at 12 months, 70.3% at 24 months, 70.3% at 36 months and 69% at 48 months. Retention was higher in the community based DSD model as compared to the facility-based model. Viral load suppression was higher in the community based DSD models in which Community Drug Distribution Points had the highest achievement (92%) followed by Community Client-Led ART Distribution (79%) compared to the facility based DSD models in which Facility Based Individual Management performance (34.3%) was far below the set standard of 95%, followed by Facility Based Groups (65%) with Fast Track Drug Refill having relatively better performance (80.9%). Being 40-59 years, receiving care from the general hospital, being married, having good current adherence, being on the first line of the current regime and being a female are other predictors of viral load suppression, whereas being 40-59 years of age, having good current adherence, being on the current first-line regime and having no co-morbidities were predictors of good retention. generally, facility and community based DSD models have demonstrated improved retention and viral load suppression. However, community-based models have shown to be more effective than facility-based models through mitigation of barriers to effective HIV/AIDS care of clients on HAART. Viral load suppression remained below the UNAIDs target of 95% by 2030, albeit it improved over time.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Although Uganda rolled out Differentiated Service Delivery(DSD) models in June 2017 to improve retention and viral load suppression rates among clients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART), these have remained low relative to the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS(UNAIDs) targets of achieving 95% population with HIV tested, 95% of tested positive clients for HIV to be on Highly active Antiretroviral therapy and 95% of clients On Antiretroviral therapy be suppressing by 2030(95-95-95 UNAIDS targets). The purpose of this study was to determine sustained retention, viral load suppression and their determinants among clients on HAART enrolled under different Differentiated service delivery models in Katakwi district in Eastern Uganda.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A retrospective cohort study of clients enrolled on HAART in the different approaches of DSD who were active by 2017 and followed up to 2020 was done. The primary outcomes included sustained retention, viral load suppression and their determinants among clients HAART in different DSD approaches. Eight health facilities providing HAART services were purposively sampled and 771 clients on HAART were sampled out by simple random selection from a total population of 4742 clients on HAART in Katakwi district. We analysed retention, viral load suppression rates, and their determinants by logistic regression method using STATA.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 771 participants were sampled of whom 42.7% were male and 57.3% were female, with the mean age being 40 years. Retention rates at 95% CI of participants were 99.35% at 12 months, 94.03 at 24 months, 89.88% at 36 months and 84.57% at 48 months. The viral load suppression rates were 57.3% at 12 months, 70.3% at 24 months, 70.3% at 36 months and 69% at 48 months. Retention was higher in the community based DSD model as compared to the facility-based model. Viral load suppression was higher in the community based DSD models in which Community Drug Distribution Points had the highest achievement (92%) followed by Community Client-Led ART Distribution (79%) compared to the facility based DSD models in which Facility Based Individual Management performance (34.3%) was far below the set standard of 95%, followed by Facility Based Groups (65%) with Fast Track Drug Refill having relatively better performance (80.9%). Being 40-59 years, receiving care from the general hospital, being married, having good current adherence, being on the first line of the current regime and being a female are other predictors of viral load suppression, whereas being 40-59 years of age, having good current adherence, being on the current first-line regime and having no co-morbidities were predictors of good retention.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
generally, facility and community based DSD models have demonstrated improved retention and viral load suppression. However, community-based models have shown to be more effective than facility-based models through mitigation of barriers to effective HIV/AIDS care of clients on HAART. Viral load suppression remained below the UNAIDs target of 95% by 2030, albeit it improved over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37886502
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3377046/v1
pmc: PMC10602122
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : R25 TW011213
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Références

J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Mar 28;20(1):21374
pubmed: 28406273
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):1069
pubmed: 30157896
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0196498
pubmed: 30024874
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):448
pubmed: 30176821
AIDS Res Ther. 2015 Nov 12;12:37
pubmed: 26566390
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;62(5):648-654
pubmed: 26567263
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):95
pubmed: 30717715
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 21;20(Suppl 4):22024
pubmed: 28770588
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 04;10(9):e0136117
pubmed: 26340271
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010424
pubmed: 30992984
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 May 1;44(9):1235-44
pubmed: 17407045
Lancet HIV. 2016 Apr;3(4):e175-82
pubmed: 27036993
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Aug;22(8):e25393
pubmed: 31454178
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):326-331
pubmed: 27787343
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 29;14:45
pubmed: 24475889
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 21;20(Suppl 4):21673
pubmed: 28770596

Auteurs

Jemba Brian (J)

Busitema University.

Sinani Waiswa (S)

Busitema University.

Joseph Balinaine (J)

Busitema University.

Rosaria Lomuria (R)

Busitema University.

Gift Gloria Nabutanyi (GG)

Busitema University.

Emmanuel Ongala (E)

Busitema University.

Benjamin Opus (B)

Busitema University.

Mary Abwola Olwedo (MA)

Soroti University.

Jacob Stanley Iramiot (JS)

Busitema University.

Paul Oboth (P)

Busitema University.

Rebecca Nekaka (R)

Busitema University.

Classifications MeSH