The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Social Work: Evidence for Impact?
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD/CRPD)
human rights
mental health and capacity law reform
mental health social work practice
social model of disability
social work practice
supported decision-making
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 10 2023
16 10 2023
Historique:
received:
12
09
2023
revised:
10
10
2023
accepted:
12
10
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
27
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (hereafter CRPD) has provided a radical imperative for the reform of mental health and capacity legislation around the world. The interpretation of the CRPD has been controversial, ranging from the complete abolition of detention, forcible treatment, and substitute decision-making to accepting that elements of these measures need to be retained based on non-discriminatory criteria, additional safeguards, and a comprehensive shift towards supported decision-making. While the potential effects of the CRPD on mental health social work and social work generally are considerable given their shared commitment towards social justice, to date there has been no review of research evidence exploring their relationship. In addressing this knowledge gap, this study held a preliminary discussion with practitioners and academics at the European Association of Social Work Mental Health Special Interest Group in Amsterdam 2022, followed by a scoping literature review on the question: What impact, if any, has the CRPD had on social work practice? The review produced four main findings: impact on legislation; positive impact on practice; limited impact on practice; and impact on social work education and research. In sum, while there were some positive indications of social work and mental health social work practice being influenced by the CRPD, these were scant. Barriers to change included tendencies among some social workers to practise substitute decision-making, in part related to resourcing and policy contexts, and understandings of disability aligned to individualised/medical rather than social perspectives. The results indicate that legal reform on its own is insufficient to impact social work practice, and that realising the potential of the CRPD will necessitate good quality training, as well as improving social workers' knowledge of the human rights of people with mental impairment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37887665
pii: ijerph20206927
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206927
pmc: PMC10606596
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Jan 1;98(1):52-58
pubmed: 31902962
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2:S198-206
pubmed: 25689212
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 May;35(3):826-833
pubmed: 35146852
Psychiatry. 2018 Summer;81(2):101-115
pubmed: 30199332
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 09;18(8):
pubmed: 33918698
Ir J Psychol Med. 2021 Nov 15;:1-2
pubmed: 34776023
Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Apr;24(2):32-34
pubmed: 33674415
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Sep;42(19):2797-2808
pubmed: 30739505
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jan-Feb;44:30-40
pubmed: 26318975
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Mar;42(5):712-721
pubmed: 30612475
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 15;17(14):
pubmed: 32679924
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 26;16:166
pubmed: 27387916
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 May-Jun;37(3):245-52
pubmed: 24280316
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 05;18(19):
pubmed: 34639762