Development of a Machine Learning-Based Model to Predict Timed-Up-and-Go Test in Older Adults.

TUG test age clinical assessment frailty machine learning osteoporosis

Journal

Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2308-3417
Titre abrégé: Geriatrics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101704019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 03 08 2023
revised: 29 09 2023
accepted: 05 10 2023
medline: 27 10 2023
pubmed: 27 10 2023
entrez: 27 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The measurement of physical frailty in elderly patients with orthopedic impairments remains a challenge due to its subjectivity, unreliability, time-consuming nature, and limited applicability to uninjured individuals. Our study aims to address this gap by developing objective, multifactorial machine models that do not rely on mobility data and subsequently validating their predictive capacity concerning the Timed-up-and-Go test (TUG test) in orthogeriatric patients. We utilized 67 multifactorial non-mobility parameters in a pre-processing phase, employing six feature selection algorithms. Subsequently, these parameters were used to train four distinct machine learning algorithms, including a generalized linear model, a support vector machine, a random forest algorithm, and an extreme gradient boost algorithm. The primary goal was to predict the time required for the TUG test without relying on mobility data. The random forest algorithm yielded the most accurate estimations of the TUG test time. The best-performing algorithm demonstrated a mean absolute error of 2.7 s, while the worst-performing algorithm exhibited an error of 7.8 s. The methodology used for variable selection appeared to exert minimal influence on the overall performance. It is essential to highlight that all the employed algorithms tended to overestimate the time for quick patients and underestimate it for slower patients. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of predicting the TUG test time using a machine learning model that does not depend on mobility data. This establishes a basis for identifying patients at risk automatically and objectively assessing the physical capacity of currently immobilized patients. Such advancements could significantly contribute to enhancing patient care and treatment planning in orthogeriatric settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37887972
pii: geriatrics8050099
doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8050099
pmc: PMC10606325
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;21(15):
pubmed: 34372371
Front Bioinform. 2022 Jun 27;2:927312
pubmed: 36304293
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;7(6):
pubmed: 36412610
J Surg Res. 2020 Sep;253:167-172
pubmed: 32361611
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 02;10(3):e0116206
pubmed: 25730322
Calcif Tissue Int. 2019 Jul;105(1):1-14
pubmed: 30972475
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1994;5(4):537-50
pubmed: 18267827
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;8(1):
pubmed: 36648910
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Aug 19;6:63
pubmed: 18713451
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103655
pubmed: 33309898
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 17;57(9):
pubmed: 34577903
Gerontologist. 2021 Nov 15;61(8):e463-e475
pubmed: 32485739
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Feb 17;1(2):e0000016
pubmed: 36812545
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Mar 19;9:433-41
pubmed: 24672230
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1216-9
pubmed: 27682033
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;19(15):
pubmed: 35954506
Exp Gerontol. 1988;23(4-5):223-39
pubmed: 3058488
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jan;32(1):75-84
pubmed: 33089354
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(2):171-178
pubmed: 29064542
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674
pubmed: 29460066
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245683
pubmed: 33481872
Gerontology. 2023;69(1):14-29
pubmed: 35977533
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(4):371-378
pubmed: 32242204
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(4):448-453
pubmed: 33786561
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005 Aug;27(8):1226-38
pubmed: 16119262
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Sep 26;7:23337214211046419
pubmed: 34595331
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Sep;11(7):1138-1144
pubmed: 32576520

Auteurs

Moritz Kraus (M)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Ulla Cordula Stumpf (UC)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Alexander Martin Keppler (AM)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Carl Neuerburg (C)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Wolfgang Böcker (W)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Henning Wackerhage (H)

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80809 Munich, Germany.

Sebastian Felix Baumbach (SF)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Maximilian Michael Saller (MM)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH