Management Practices of Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality on Egyptian Dairies.
Egyptian dairies
herd demographics
management practices
mastitis status and control
milking practices
survey
Journal
Veterinary sciences
ISSN: 2306-7381
Titre abrégé: Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101680127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2023
21 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
12
09
2023
revised:
08
10
2023
accepted:
17
10
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
27
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Milk production continues to be the main source of income for dairy producers, and mastitis continues to be the major health challenge for dairy cows worldwide. The objective of the current study was to describe the different management practices implemented in Egyptian dairies, which may influence mastitis and improve milk quality. An in-person survey was completed with herd managers and owners of 20 Egyptian dairies selected using a stratified random sample from four of Egypt's milk sheds. The questionnaire included 80 questions that inquired about herd demographics, mastitis status and control, milking practices, and management practices of the study dairies. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, multiple factor analysis (MFA), and hierarchical clustering to identify the important principal components and different dairy clusters. Of the surveyed herds, 69.50% had less than 500 lactating cows, with Holstein as the main cow breed. The reported average milk production on the study herds was 31.1 (SE ± 1.10) Kg/cow/day. Housing of lactating, dry, and close-up cows was in open lots. The majority of the dairies milked cows were three times per day (90.63%), the remaining milked cows four (5.00%) or a mix of four and three times per day. Furthermore, herringbone parlor design was the most common parlor design (66.79%) in the study dairies. The most common disinfectants used for both pre- and post-milking teat dip were iodine-based, 90.0% and 95.0%, respectively, while 52.16% of the dairies reported that their milkers wore gloves during milking. The reported mean annual percentage of mastitis was 52.3%, as a percent of the milking herd. The study dairies reported the inspection of udder health through either visual inspection (95.00%), udder hygiene score (86.88%), teat end score (71.88%), and/or using CMT (54.91%). Contagious mastitis pathogens were reported in 45.2% of the study herds. More than 50% of the study herds relied on importing pregnant cows or pregnant heifers as replacements. Multiple factor analysis identified 20 questions and represented 5 components of variability related to mastitis on dairies. The current survey of Egyptian dairies described the herd demographics and different management practices related to mastitis control and prevention. All the study dairies relied on the blanket intramammary antimicrobial drugs at dry off when current research elsewhere has identified selective dry cow therapy as an integral component of antimicrobial stewardship on dairies. Further research is required to identify the association between different management factors and the occurrence of mastitis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37888581
pii: vetsci10100629
doi: 10.3390/vetsci10100629
pmc: PMC10611314
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : U.S. - Egypt Joint Board on Scientific and Technological Cooperation Collaborative Research Grants, U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Contract No. EG_US C20 -
ID : Project US ID 1127 (Egypt ID: 45894).
Références
J Dairy Sci. 1989 May;72(5):1308-12
pubmed: 2745833
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Mar;103(3):2602-2614
pubmed: 31882223
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Aug;105(8):6936-6946
pubmed: 35773032
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):6926-34
pubmed: 25218745
Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 11;9(10):
pubmed: 36288172
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jul;92(7):3274-80
pubmed: 19528604
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1366-77
pubmed: 18349229
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;11(7):
pubmed: 35884208
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4797-4806
pubmed: 28434736
J Dairy Res. 2010 Feb;77(1):99-106
pubmed: 19906321
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Apr;95(4):1906-12
pubmed: 22459837
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jun;104(6):6975-6984
pubmed: 33865575
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Sep;84(9):2018-24
pubmed: 11573781
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Oct;103(10):9548-9560
pubmed: 32828498
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Mar 04;7:127
pubmed: 32195277
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 20;9:e11108
pubmed: 33976962
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Jul;97(7):4141-50
pubmed: 24792788
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1348-57
pubmed: 24418277
Vet Res Forum. 2014 Winter;5(1):13-9
pubmed: 25568687
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012 Jul;28(2):225-37
pubmed: 22664205
J Dairy Sci. 1989 Jan;72(1):250-8
pubmed: 2925950
Can Vet J. 2012 Oct;53(10):1119-22
pubmed: 23543934
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):5730-9
pubmed: 22884345
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Mar;95(3):1170-6
pubmed: 22365201
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Mar 18;7:149
pubmed: 32258070
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2003 Mar;19(1):139-55
pubmed: 12682939
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Sep;87(9):3089-91
pubmed: 15375073
Vet Med Int. 2022 Sep 17;2022:7775197
pubmed: 36164492
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Feb;94(2):563-79
pubmed: 21257026
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Nov;95(11):6421-35
pubmed: 22981577
J Dairy Sci. 1983 Feb;66(2):253-8
pubmed: 6339577
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Feb;99(2):1483-1494
pubmed: 26709177
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Oct;87(10):3561-73
pubmed: 15377636
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012 Jul;28(2):217-24
pubmed: 22664204
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Jun;91(6):2225-35
pubmed: 18487645
J Dairy Res. 2010 Feb;77(1):90-4
pubmed: 19919726
Br Vet J. 1989 Sep-Oct;145(5):401-9
pubmed: 2676077
Microorganisms. 2021 May 29;9(6):
pubmed: 34072543
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Apr;90(4):1704-15
pubmed: 17369210
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jun;98(6):3741-53
pubmed: 25864052
Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 03;7(4):
pubmed: 33153084
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Feb;98(2):1354-61
pubmed: 25497825
N Z Vet J. 2011 Jan;59(1):24-7
pubmed: 21328154
Animal. 2009 Feb;3(2):315-28
pubmed: 22444235
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Mar;100(3):2080-2089
pubmed: 27988116
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Jan;85(1):105-11
pubmed: 11860102
J Dairy Sci. 1987 Apr;70(4):867-72
pubmed: 3584620
N Z Vet J. 2009 Aug;57(4):208-14
pubmed: 19649014