Pre-Procedural Right Atrial Diameter May Predict the Development of Typical Atrial Flutter in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
Journal
Anatolian journal of cardiology
ISSN: 2149-2271
Titre abrégé: Anatol J Cardiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101652981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2023
01 12 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
12
2023
pubmed:
27
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Some patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation may develop typical atrial flutter on follow-up, and a second procedure for typical atrial flutter is often required in such patients. In this study, we aimed to define the variables associated with the development of typical atrial flutter after ablation. One hundred fifty-nine patients who underwent catheter ablation for the first time due to atrial fibrillation and who did not have a previously documented atrial flutter were included in the study. Before ablation, baseline clinical features and echocardiographic parameters were recorded. At the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after the procedure, and then annually, the patients were followed up for typical atrial flutter development. At a mean follow-up of 34.0 (14.0-50.0) months, typical atrial flutter developed in 21 (13.2%) patients. During the follow-up, right atrial diameter was greater in those who developed typical atrial flutter than those who did not [39.0 (38.0-43.0) vs. 36.0 (34.0-39.0) mm, P <.001]. A multiple Cox regression analysis showed that the right atrial diameter was the only independent predictor of typical atrial flutter development (hazard ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23, P =.021). A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the best cutoff for the right atrial diameter was 38.5 mm to predict typical atrial flutter development (area under the curve = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.86, sensitivity = 62%, specificity = 75%, P <.001). In patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, a pre-procedural right atrial diameter measurement may predict typical atrial flutter development at follow-up. In particular, patients with a pre-procedural right atrial diameter ≥39 mm may be at a higher risk for developing typical atrial flutter in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Some patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation may develop typical atrial flutter on follow-up, and a second procedure for typical atrial flutter is often required in such patients. In this study, we aimed to define the variables associated with the development of typical atrial flutter after ablation.
METHODS
One hundred fifty-nine patients who underwent catheter ablation for the first time due to atrial fibrillation and who did not have a previously documented atrial flutter were included in the study. Before ablation, baseline clinical features and echocardiographic parameters were recorded. At the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after the procedure, and then annually, the patients were followed up for typical atrial flutter development.
RESULTS
At a mean follow-up of 34.0 (14.0-50.0) months, typical atrial flutter developed in 21 (13.2%) patients. During the follow-up, right atrial diameter was greater in those who developed typical atrial flutter than those who did not [39.0 (38.0-43.0) vs. 36.0 (34.0-39.0) mm, P <.001]. A multiple Cox regression analysis showed that the right atrial diameter was the only independent predictor of typical atrial flutter development (hazard ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23, P =.021). A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the best cutoff for the right atrial diameter was 38.5 mm to predict typical atrial flutter development (area under the curve = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.86, sensitivity = 62%, specificity = 75%, P <.001).
CONCLUSION
In patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, a pre-procedural right atrial diameter measurement may predict typical atrial flutter development at follow-up. In particular, patients with a pre-procedural right atrial diameter ≥39 mm may be at a higher risk for developing typical atrial flutter in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37888784
doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3324
pmc: PMC10698382
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
697-705Références
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;15(6):680-90
pubmed: 24451180
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998 May;9(5):462-9
pubmed: 9607453
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 26;51(8):779-86
pubmed: 18294560
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2002 Dec;7(3):225-31
pubmed: 12510133
Circulation. 1997 Nov 18;96(10):3484-91
pubmed: 9396445
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;124(11):1690-1696
pubmed: 31607374
Circulation. 2003 Nov 18;108(20):2479-83
pubmed: 14610012
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):e275-e444
pubmed: 28506916
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;25(2):129-138
pubmed: 33583820
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep;64(3):597-605
pubmed: 34709505
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;42(11):1421-1428
pubmed: 31482578
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):679-85
pubmed: 18325850
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;42(7):910-921
pubmed: 31106431
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 2;43(11):2057-62
pubmed: 15172412
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1987-1995
pubmed: 32530541
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Apr;13(4):e136-221
pubmed: 26409100
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;57(2):233-240
pubmed: 31102114
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Sep;27(9):1202-11
pubmed: 15461709
Circulation. 1999 Jun 15;99(23):3017-23
pubmed: 10368119
Circulation. 2007 Dec 11;116(24):2786-92
pubmed: 18040030
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2020 Aug;9(2):54-60
pubmed: 32983525
Circ Res. 1994 May;74(5):882-94
pubmed: 8156635