Double Trisomy 16 and 22 Clinically Mimic Partial Hydatidiform Mole in a Case of Subsequent Pregnancy Loss.
Journal
Physiological research
ISSN: 1802-9973
Titre abrégé: Physiol Res
Pays: Czech Republic
ID NLM: 9112413
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 10 2023
27 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
27
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A case of double trisomy 16 and 22 in the second pregnancy loss is presented. DNA analyses (short tandem repeats genotyping) of miscarriage specimen was indicated because of ultrasound suspicion of partial hydatidiform mole. After the partial hydatidiform mole exclusion, further DNA analyses focused on the most common aneuploidies causing pregnancy loss, detected double trisomy 16 and 22 in the product of conception. The couple was referred to clinical genetic consultation and normal parental karyotypes were proved. For further explanatory purposes, archived material from the first pregnancy loss was analyzed and trisomy of chromosome 18 was detected. By comparison of allelic profiles of the mother, father, and both losses, the maternal origin of all aneuploidies was proven what can be attributed to frequent meiosis errors, probably due to advanced maternal age (44 years at the first loss and 45 years at the second loss). In conclusion, aneuploidies can mimic partial hydatidiform mole. Genetic analysis is helpful on the one hand to rule out partial hydatidiform mole and on the other hand to identify aneuploidies and in this way to determine the cause of miscarriage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37888974
pii: 935174
pmc: PMC10669944
doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935174
Substances chimiques
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S309-S313Références
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Dec;103(3):237-40
pubmed: 18812245
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2018;119(6):330-334
pubmed: 29947231
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):262-8
pubmed: 25624662
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;32(5):371-379
pubmed: 32590384
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Feb;36(2):186-91
pubmed: 26716606
Hum Reprod. 2006 Apr;21(4):958-66
pubmed: 16361293
Ceska Gynekol. 2021 Winter;86(6):381-386
pubmed: 35038875
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2011 Nov-Dec;14(6):460-8
pubmed: 21875355