Management of de Quervain Tenosynovitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 10 2023
02 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
27
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a plethora of treatment options for patients with de Quervain tenosynovitis (DQT), but there are limited data on their effectiveness and no definitive management guidelines. To assess and compare the effectiveness associated with available treatment options for DQT to guide musculoskeletal practitioners and inform guidelines. Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, OpenGrey.eu, and WorldCat.org were searched for published studies, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, The European Union Clinical Trials Register, and the ISRCTN registry were searched for unpublished and ongoing studies from inception to August 2022. All randomized clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of any intervention for the management of DQT. This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO and conducted and reported per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions (PRISMA-NMA) and PRISMA in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport Medicine and Sports Science (PERSIST) guidance. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool were used for risk of bias and certainty of evidence assessment for each outcome. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed for patient-reported pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and for function using the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Q-DASH) scale. Mean differences (MD) with their 95% CIs were calculated for the pairwise meta-analyses. A total of 30 studies with 1663 patients (mean [SD] age, 46 [7] years; 80% female) were included, of which 19 studies were included in quantitative analyses. From the pairwise meta-analyses, based on evidence of moderate certainty, adding thumb spica immobilization for 3 to 4 weeks to a corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with statistically but not clinically significant functional benefits in the short-term (MD, 10.5 [95% CI, 6.8-14.1] points) and mid-term (MD, 9.4 [95% CI, 7.0-11.9] points). In the network meta-analysis, interventions that included ultrasonography-guided CSI ranked at the top for pain. CSI with thumb spica immobilization had the highest probability of being the most effective intervention for short- and mid-term function. This network meta-analysis found that adding a short period of thumb spica immobilization to CSI was associated with statistically but not clinically significant short- and mid-term benefits. These findings suggest that administration of CSI followed by 3 to 4 weeks immobilization should be considered as a first-line treatment for patients with DQT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37889490
pii: 2811119
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37001
pmc: PMC10611995
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2337001Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R020515/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jan;39(1):37-41
pubmed: 24315492
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Aug;99(8):1635-1649.e21
pubmed: 28860097
J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2014 Jun;7(3):115-21
pubmed: 24929455
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 06;10(5):e4305
pubmed: 35539295
Int J Biometeorol. 2021 Aug;65(8):1391-1398
pubmed: 33675398
Am Fam Physician. 2018 Jun 15;97(12):Online
pubmed: 30216006
J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Mar;27(2):322-4
pubmed: 11901392
Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;94(8):1095-110
pubmed: 24700135
Hand (N Y). 2020 Mar;15(2):215-219
pubmed: 30060681
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
BMJ. 2014 Sep 24;349:g5630
pubmed: 25252733
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Feb;24(2):149-57
pubmed: 23412309
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):947-51
pubmed: 23814248
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Apr;106(2):301-306
pubmed: 31899117
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):927-32
pubmed: 19535272
Arch Iran Med. 2010 Jul;13(4):270-4
pubmed: 20597558
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2023 Mar 01;27(1):14-16
pubmed: 35686888
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Sep;23(5):840-3
pubmed: 9763259
Hand (N Y). 2020 May;15(3):348-352
pubmed: 30428712
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(4):691-697
pubmed: 28035912
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD005616
pubmed: 19588376
J Hand Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;29(1):3-11
pubmed: 26705671
Oman Med J. 2011 Mar;26(2):91-3
pubmed: 22043391
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Sep-Oct;49(5):542-8
pubmed: 26538761
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14581
pubmed: 34185386
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jun;82(6):628-635
pubmed: 31082847
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Jul;37(6):523-7
pubmed: 22095403
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 3;100(35):e27067
pubmed: 34477139
J Wrist Surg. 2021 Oct;10(5):377-384
pubmed: 34631289
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):398-403
pubmed: 21051423
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 13;77:103620
pubmed: 35638053
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;44(1):30-9
pubmed: 24175606
Int Orthop. 2015 Aug;39(8):1563-9
pubmed: 25916954
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Apr 1;480(4):762-770
pubmed: 34694249
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Aug;70(8):1314-1318
pubmed: 32794478
Eur Radiol. 2015 May;25(5):1512-9
pubmed: 25465711
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Oct 27;10:131
pubmed: 19860883
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Dec;32(10):1513-20
pubmed: 18070637
Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Apr;100(1):49-52
pubmed: 26645452
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Dec;86(12):2700-6
pubmed: 15590856
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Apr;34(4):719-23
pubmed: 19345877
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 1;23(1):831
pubmed: 36050704