Community-level determinants of stakeholder perceptions of community stigma toward people with opioid use disorders, harm reduction services and treatment in the HEALing Communities Study.

Community coalitions Drug treatment Medication Naloxone Opioid use disorder Stigma

Journal

The International journal on drug policy
ISSN: 1873-4758
Titre abrégé: Int J Drug Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9014759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 17 07 2023
revised: 16 09 2023
accepted: 16 10 2023
pubmed: 28 10 2023
medline: 28 10 2023
entrez: 27 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Community stigma toward people with opioid use disorder (OUD) can impede access to harm reduction services and treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Such community OUD stigma is partially rooted in community-level social and economic conditions, yet there remains a paucity of large-scale quantitative data examining community-level factors associated with OUD stigma. We examined whether rurality, social inequity, and racialized segregation across communities from four states in the HEALing Communities Study (HCS) were associated with 1) greater perceived community stigma toward people treated for OUD, 2) greater perceived intervention stigma toward MOUD, and 3) greater perceived intervention stigma toward naloxone by community stakeholders in the HCS. From November 2019-January 2020, a cross-sectional survey about community OUD stigma was administered to 801 members of opioid overdose prevention coalitions across 66 communities in four states prior to the start of HCS intervention activities. Bivariate analyses assessed pairwise associations between community rural/urban status and each of the three stigma variables, using linear mixed effect modeling to account for response clustering within communities, state, and respondent sociodemographic characteristics. We conducted similar bivariate analyses to assess pairwise associations between racialized segregation and social inequity. On average, the perceived community OUD stigma scale score of stakeholders from rural communities was 4% higher (β=1.57, SE=0.7, p≤0.05), stigma toward MOUD was 6% higher (β=0.28, SE=0.1, p≤0.05), and stigma toward naloxone was 10% higher (β=0.46, SE=0.1, p≤0.01) than among stakeholders from urban communities. No significant differences in the three stigma variables were found among communities based on racialized segregation or social inequity. Perceived community stigma toward people treated for OUD, MOUD, and naloxone was higher among stakeholders in rural communities than in urban communities. Findings suggest that interventions and policies to reduce community-level stigma, particularly in rural areas, are warranted.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Community stigma toward people with opioid use disorder (OUD) can impede access to harm reduction services and treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Such community OUD stigma is partially rooted in community-level social and economic conditions, yet there remains a paucity of large-scale quantitative data examining community-level factors associated with OUD stigma. We examined whether rurality, social inequity, and racialized segregation across communities from four states in the HEALing Communities Study (HCS) were associated with 1) greater perceived community stigma toward people treated for OUD, 2) greater perceived intervention stigma toward MOUD, and 3) greater perceived intervention stigma toward naloxone by community stakeholders in the HCS.
METHODS METHODS
From November 2019-January 2020, a cross-sectional survey about community OUD stigma was administered to 801 members of opioid overdose prevention coalitions across 66 communities in four states prior to the start of HCS intervention activities. Bivariate analyses assessed pairwise associations between community rural/urban status and each of the three stigma variables, using linear mixed effect modeling to account for response clustering within communities, state, and respondent sociodemographic characteristics. We conducted similar bivariate analyses to assess pairwise associations between racialized segregation and social inequity.
RESULTS RESULTS
On average, the perceived community OUD stigma scale score of stakeholders from rural communities was 4% higher (β=1.57, SE=0.7, p≤0.05), stigma toward MOUD was 6% higher (β=0.28, SE=0.1, p≤0.05), and stigma toward naloxone was 10% higher (β=0.46, SE=0.1, p≤0.01) than among stakeholders from urban communities. No significant differences in the three stigma variables were found among communities based on racialized segregation or social inequity.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Perceived community stigma toward people treated for OUD, MOUD, and naloxone was higher among stakeholders in rural communities than in urban communities. Findings suggest that interventions and policies to reduce community-level stigma, particularly in rural areas, are warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37890391
pii: S0955-3959(23)00288-8
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104241
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104241

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : T32 DA037801
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Alissa Davis (A)

Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: ad3324@columbia.edu.

Kristi Lynn Stringer (KL)

Department of Health and Human Performance, Community and Public Health, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United States.

Mari-Lynn Drainoni (ML)

Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedesian School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Carrie B Oser (CB)

Department of Sociology, Center on Drug & Alcohol Research, Center for Health Equity Transformation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Hannah K Knudsen (HK)

Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug & Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Alison Aldrich (A)

CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Hilary L Surratt (HL)

Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug & Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Daniel M Walker (DM)

CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Louisa Gilbert (L)

Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States.

Dget L Downey (DL)

Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States.

Sam D Gardner (SD)

Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States.

Sylvia Tan (S)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Lisa M Lines (LM)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Nathan Vandergrift (N)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Nicole Mack (N)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

JaNae Holloway (J)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

Karsten Lunze (K)

Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedesian School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.

Ann Scheck McAlearney (AS)

CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Timothy R Huerta (TR)

CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Dawn A Goddard-Eckrich (DA)

Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States.

Nabila El-Bassel (N)

Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States.

Classifications MeSH