Megameatus intact prepuce variant reconstruction: Long-term outcomes and comparison to post-circumcision hypospadias repair.

Circumcision Hypospadias Hypospadias repair complications Hypospadias repair outcome Megameatus intact prepuce

Journal

Journal of pediatric urology
ISSN: 1873-4898
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 06 05 2023
revised: 17 09 2023
accepted: 12 10 2023
medline: 28 10 2023
pubmed: 28 10 2023
entrez: 27 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Megameatus intact prepuce (MIP) variant is considered a surgical challenge with associated high complication rates. It is usually diagnosed and corrected only after neonatal circumcision, which is discouraged in non-MIP hypospadias. In order to determine whether the features of the MIP variant or the performance of a secondary reconstruction following circumcision comprise the cause of higher complication rates, we now compared the results of post-circumcision MIP hypospadias repair to the results of children who underwent repair of non-MIP hypospadias following neonatal circumcision. Reoperation rates of children operated for hypospadias repair following neonatal circumcision between 1999 and 2020 were compared between those with MIP and those with classic non-MIP hypospadias. In total, 139 patients who had undergone neonatal circumcision underwent surgical reconstruction at a mean age of 13 months. Sixty-nine had classic hypospadias and 70 had the MIP variant. The median follow-up was 10 years (interquartile range 6,13). The classic group had a higher rate of meatal location below the corona compared to the MIP variant group (53 % vs. 28 %, respectively, p = 0.002). The reoperation rate was comparable for the two groups (32 % vs. 27 %, p = 0.58, Table). Univariate analysis for the MIP hypospadias group showed no association between reoperation and the initial patient characteristics, while a higher probability of reoperation was demonstrated in the presence of ventral curvature (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.02), and a higher grade of hypospadias (odds ratio 3.3, p = 0.03 for meatal location lower than the coronal sulcus) in the non-MIP group. The limitations of our work include its retrospective design wherein the patients' characteristics, including classification as MIP vs. non-MIP, are derived from medical records. More patients in the non-MIP group were documented to have penile curvature. The non-MIP group was composed of more patients with meatal location under the coronal sulcus, a factor which may increase the rates for reoperation in that group. Still, with the comparison of the largest reported cohort of circumcised MIP with circumcised non-MIP patients together with an extended follow-up period, we believe that we present strong evidence of the possible role of previous circumcision in the surgical challenge of reconstructing MIP hypospadias. Reoperation rates in MIP hypospadias are high but similar to those of classic hypospadias, both following circumcision, suggesting that circumcision, rather than the unique features of the variant, is the cause for complications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Megameatus intact prepuce (MIP) variant is considered a surgical challenge with associated high complication rates. It is usually diagnosed and corrected only after neonatal circumcision, which is discouraged in non-MIP hypospadias.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
In order to determine whether the features of the MIP variant or the performance of a secondary reconstruction following circumcision comprise the cause of higher complication rates, we now compared the results of post-circumcision MIP hypospadias repair to the results of children who underwent repair of non-MIP hypospadias following neonatal circumcision.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Reoperation rates of children operated for hypospadias repair following neonatal circumcision between 1999 and 2020 were compared between those with MIP and those with classic non-MIP hypospadias.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 139 patients who had undergone neonatal circumcision underwent surgical reconstruction at a mean age of 13 months. Sixty-nine had classic hypospadias and 70 had the MIP variant. The median follow-up was 10 years (interquartile range 6,13). The classic group had a higher rate of meatal location below the corona compared to the MIP variant group (53 % vs. 28 %, respectively, p = 0.002). The reoperation rate was comparable for the two groups (32 % vs. 27 %, p = 0.58, Table). Univariate analysis for the MIP hypospadias group showed no association between reoperation and the initial patient characteristics, while a higher probability of reoperation was demonstrated in the presence of ventral curvature (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.02), and a higher grade of hypospadias (odds ratio 3.3, p = 0.03 for meatal location lower than the coronal sulcus) in the non-MIP group.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The limitations of our work include its retrospective design wherein the patients' characteristics, including classification as MIP vs. non-MIP, are derived from medical records. More patients in the non-MIP group were documented to have penile curvature. The non-MIP group was composed of more patients with meatal location under the coronal sulcus, a factor which may increase the rates for reoperation in that group. Still, with the comparison of the largest reported cohort of circumcised MIP with circumcised non-MIP patients together with an extended follow-up period, we believe that we present strong evidence of the possible role of previous circumcision in the surgical challenge of reconstructing MIP hypospadias.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Reoperation rates in MIP hypospadias are high but similar to those of classic hypospadias, both following circumcision, suggesting that circumcision, rather than the unique features of the variant, is the cause for complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37891026
pii: S1477-5131(23)00439-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest None.

Auteurs

Haim Herzberg (H)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Reuben Ben-David (R)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Tomer Mendelson (T)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Adit Dubi-Sobol (A)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Tomer Bashi (T)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Ziv Savin (Z)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Jacob Ben-Chaim (J)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Yuval Bar-Yosef (Y)

Department of Urology, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: yuvalby@tlvmc.gov.il.

Classifications MeSH