Association of gait and cognition after surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 10 2023
27 10 2023
Historique:
received:
09
02
2023
accepted:
21
10
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
28
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a treatable disease in older adults. The association between gait and cognition has recently become a topic of interest. Sequential changes in this association were investigated in patients with iNPH using a newly developed statistical method. Data were extracted from the SINPHONI-2 multicenter study on iNPH. Fifty patients who underwent shunt surgery were included in this study. Gait and cognition were assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) tests. In addition to the MMSE total score, changes in the sub-item scores were examined. The ordinal sub-items of the MMSE are usually treated as continuous or categorical; however, both are unsuitable. An ordinal smoothing penalty with a generalized additive model enables precise statistical inference of ordinal and binary predictors. The TUG time improved significantly at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The MMSE total scores increased without statistical significance. Preoperatively, there was no association between TUG time and MMSE sub-items. At 3 months, the "Registration," "3-step command," "Read," and "Copy" sub-items were statistically significant. The number of significant sub-items increased after 12 months. Thus, the association between gait and cognition gradually increased after surgery in patients with iNPH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37891211
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45629-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-45629-8
pmc: PMC10611736
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18460Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Neurol Sci. 1965 Jul-Aug;2(4):307-27
pubmed: 5889177
J Neurol. 2016 Aug;263(8):1669-77
pubmed: 27017344
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
pubmed: 1991946
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Mar 22;15(1):112
pubmed: 35317852
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jun;14(6):585-94
pubmed: 25934242
J Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;125(6):1483-1492
pubmed: 26871203
Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6
pubmed: 11113214
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(11):775-809
pubmed: 23183074
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Jun 01;72(6):846-854
pubmed: 28177065
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 May 16;74(6):943-948
pubmed: 29917045
Neurosurgery. 2005 Sep;57(3 Suppl):S1-3; discussion ii-v
pubmed: 16160424
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;20(2-3):71-6
pubmed: 15908748
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Jan;18(1):50-56
pubmed: 28858411
J Clin Med. 2020 May 20;9(5):
pubmed: 32443659
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Apr;28(4):1153-1159
pubmed: 33316127
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008;48 Suppl:S1-23
pubmed: 18408356
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Feb;164(2):469-478
pubmed: 34970701
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11732
pubmed: 34083550
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Jan 20;12:617150
pubmed: 33551791
Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Mar;3(1):
pubmed: 29594174
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2011 Jan 1;55(1):366-374
pubmed: 20948974