Deep Learning-Based Approaches for Enhanced Diagnosis and Comprehensive Understanding of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Adam optimizer
carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)
cross-sectional area (CSA)
deep learning (DL)
machine learning (ML)
statistical analysis
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
31
08
2023
revised:
03
10
2023
accepted:
05
10
2023
medline:
28
10
2023
pubmed:
28
10
2023
entrez:
28
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent medical condition resulting from compression of the median nerve in the hand, often caused by overuse or age-related factors. In this study, a total of 160 patients participated, including 80 individuals with CTS presenting varying levels of severity across different age groups. Numerous studies have explored the use of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques for CTS diagnosis. However, further research is required to fully leverage the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in CTS diagnosis, addressing the challenges and limitations highlighted in the existing literature. In our work, we propose a novel approach for CTS diagnosis, prediction, and monitoring disease progression. The proposed framework consists of three main layers. Firstly, we employ three distinct DL models for CTS diagnosis. Through our experiments, the proposed approach demonstrates superior performance across multiple evaluation metrics, with an accuracy of 0.969%, precision of 0.982%, and recall of 0.963%. The second layer focuses on predicting the cross-sectional area (CSA) at 1, 3, and 6 months using ML models, aiming to forecast disease progression during therapy. The best-performing model achieves an accuracy of 0.9522, an R2 score of 0.667, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0132, and a median squared error (MdSE) of 0.0639. The highest predictive performance is observed after 6 months. The third layer concentrates on assessing significant changes in the patients' health status through statistical tests, including significance tests, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and a two-way ANOVA test. These tests aim to determine the effect of injections on CTS treatment. The results reveal a highly significant reduction in symptoms, as evidenced by scores from the Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale, as well as a decrease in CSA after 1, 3, and 6 months following the injection. SHAP is then utilized to provide an understandable explanation of the final prediction. Overall, our study presents a comprehensive approach for CTS diagnosis, prediction, and monitoring, showcasing promising results in terms of accuracy, precision, and recall for CTS diagnosis, as well as effective prediction of disease progression and evaluation of treatment effectiveness through statistical analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37892032
pii: diagnostics13203211
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203211
pmc: PMC10606231
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Multimed Tools Appl. 2023 Jun 7;:1-22
pubmed: 37362732
BMJ. 2014 Jul 11;349:g4550
pubmed: 25015369
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Nov;15(12):1273-1284
pubmed: 27751557
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 07;23(12):
pubmed: 37420558
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jul;43(7):887-95
pubmed: 15100417
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;13(3):417-422
pubmed: 31602055
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Dec;35(6):1433-1444
pubmed: 35661280
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 18;10(4):e4279
pubmed: 35450263
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Feb 8;24(1):38
pubmed: 35135598
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;13(3):
pubmed: 36766597
Neurosurgery. 2022 Jan 1;90(1):106-113
pubmed: 34982877
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jan;4(2):30
pubmed: 26889483
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;13(1):
pubmed: 36611296
Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1162-6
pubmed: 18846454
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Mar;136:109518
pubmed: 33434859
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2008 Jun;6(1):21-6
pubmed: 25161440
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):40-9
pubmed: 21499542
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:3025-3028
pubmed: 34891881
Neurol Sci. 2010 Jun;31(3):243-52
pubmed: 20145967
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):OC13-8
pubmed: 27630881
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966 Mar;48(2):211-28
pubmed: 5934271
J Clin Ultrasound. 2009 Sep;37(7):389-93
pubmed: 19479718
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2020 Mar;80:101687
pubmed: 32004994
J Anat. 2020 Apr;236(4):660-667
pubmed: 31797384
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Nov 10;8(11):
pubmed: 34821747
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1585-92
pubmed: 8245050
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 31;11(1):17464
pubmed: 34465860
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 17;11:625830
pubmed: 33391002
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Oct;48(10):2052-2059
pubmed: 35868907