First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy versus Sequential Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with ≤49% Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study.
chemoimmunotherapy
first-line platinum-based chemotherapy
immune checkpoint inhibitor
non-small cell lung cancer
programmed death-ligand 1 expression
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
22
09
2023
revised:
11
10
2023
accepted:
13
10
2023
medline:
28
10
2023
pubmed:
28
10
2023
entrez:
28
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The long overall survival (OS) observed among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) groups in previous phase III trials suggests the limited efficacy of CIT among the subgroup with ≤49% PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. Hence, sequential treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy followed by second-line immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (SEQ) is an option. This study examined whether first-line CIT would provide better outcomes than SEQ in patients with advanced NSCLC with ≤49% PD-L1 expression. This retrospective study evaluated patients with untreated NSCLC who received first-line CIT or SEQ at nine hospitals in Japan. OS, progression-free survival (PFS), PFS-2 (the time from first-line treatment to progression to second-line treatment or death), and other related outcomes were evaluated between the CIT and SEQ groups. Among the 305 enrolled patients, 234 eligible patients were analyzed: 165 in the CIT group and 69 in the SEQ group. The COX proportional hazards model suggested a significant interaction between PD-L1 expression and OS ( CIT is recommended for patients with NSCLC with 1-49% PD-L1 expression because it significantly improved OS and PFS compared to SEQ. CIT had limited benefits in patients with <1% PD-L1 expression, and the median PFS-2 in the SEQ group was significantly longer than the median PFS in the CIT group. These findings will help physicians select the most suitable treatment option for patients with NSCLC, considering PD-L1 expressions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The long overall survival (OS) observed among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) groups in previous phase III trials suggests the limited efficacy of CIT among the subgroup with ≤49% PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. Hence, sequential treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy followed by second-line immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (SEQ) is an option. This study examined whether first-line CIT would provide better outcomes than SEQ in patients with advanced NSCLC with ≤49% PD-L1 expression.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective study evaluated patients with untreated NSCLC who received first-line CIT or SEQ at nine hospitals in Japan. OS, progression-free survival (PFS), PFS-2 (the time from first-line treatment to progression to second-line treatment or death), and other related outcomes were evaluated between the CIT and SEQ groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 305 enrolled patients, 234 eligible patients were analyzed: 165 in the CIT group and 69 in the SEQ group. The COX proportional hazards model suggested a significant interaction between PD-L1 expression and OS (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
CIT is recommended for patients with NSCLC with 1-49% PD-L1 expression because it significantly improved OS and PFS compared to SEQ. CIT had limited benefits in patients with <1% PD-L1 expression, and the median PFS-2 in the SEQ group was significantly longer than the median PFS in the CIT group. These findings will help physicians select the most suitable treatment option for patients with NSCLC, considering PD-L1 expressions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37894357
pii: cancers15204988
doi: 10.3390/cancers15204988
pmc: PMC10605814
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 10;41(11):1992-1998
pubmed: 36809080
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 1;383(14):1328-1339
pubmed: 32997907
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jul;10(7):3093-3105
pubmed: 34430350
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28
pubmed: 25891174
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 20;41(6):1213-1227
pubmed: 36327426
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Oct;15(10):1657-1669
pubmed: 32599071
Nature. 2017 Jan 18;541(7637):321-330
pubmed: 28102259
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023 Jun;72(6):1881-1890
pubmed: 36690799
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 8;14(1):695
pubmed: 36755027
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2288-2301
pubmed: 29863955
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;17(12):725-741
pubmed: 32760014
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Ann Oncol. 2021 Jul;32(7):881-895
pubmed: 33894335
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 23;115(43):E10119-E10126
pubmed: 30297397
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):198-211
pubmed: 33476593
J Immunol. 2003 Feb 1;170(3):1257-66
pubmed: 12538684
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-1365
pubmed: 32919526
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051
pubmed: 30280635
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;12:980765
pubmed: 36033444
Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 Dec;2(12):1220-9
pubmed: 25324403
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jun;10(6):2475-2486
pubmed: 34295655
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Ann Oncol. 2022 May;33(5):511-521
pubmed: 35218887
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 May 3;7(1):120
pubmed: 31053172
Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265
pubmed: 27979383
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2020-2031
pubmed: 31562796
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 08;7:12335
pubmed: 27498556
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092
pubmed: 29658856
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jul;20(7):924-937
pubmed: 31122901
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48
pubmed: 36633525
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 1;24(15):3560-3571
pubmed: 29661778
Respir Res. 2022 Nov 5;23(1):302
pubmed: 36335353
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407
Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 1;75(23):5034-45
pubmed: 26573793
Lung Cancer. 2020 Jun;144:71-75
pubmed: 32387683
Lancet. 2019 May 4;393(10183):1819-1830
pubmed: 30955977
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 20;39(21):2339-2349
pubmed: 33872070
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 1;21(11):2635-43
pubmed: 25680376
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Oct;16(10):1718-1732
pubmed: 34048946