Analysis of Connectome Graphs Based on Boundary Scale.
Betti numbers
connectome
hypergraph theory
topological scale
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Oct 2023
20 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
27
07
2023
revised:
10
10
2023
accepted:
11
10
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
28
10
2023
entrez:
28
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this work is to advance in the computational study of connectome graphs from a topological point of view. Specifically, starting from a sequence of hypergraphs associated to a brain graph (obtained using the Boundary Scale model, BS2), we analyze the resulting scale-space representation using classical topological features, such as Betti numbers and average node and edge degrees. In this way, the topological information that can be extracted from the original graph is substantially enriched, thus providing an insightful description of the graph from a clinical perspective. To assess the qualitative and quantitative topological information gain of the BS2 model, we carried out an empirical analysis of neuroimaging data using a dataset that contains the connectomes of 96 healthy subjects, 52 women and 44 men, generated from MRI scans in the Human Connectome Project. The results obtained shed light on the differences between these two classes of subjects in terms of neural connectivity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37896699
pii: s23208607
doi: 10.3390/s23208607
pmc: PMC10610691
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e48121
pubmed: 23272041
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 01;10(7):e0130045
pubmed: 26132764
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7456-61
pubmed: 24799693
J Imaging. 2022 Aug 18;8(8):
pubmed: 36005464
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98
pubmed: 19190637
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;118(11):2317-31
pubmed: 17900977
Cogn Neurodyn. 2017 Oct;11(5):483-486
pubmed: 29067135
J Comput Neurosci. 2016 Aug;41(1):1-14
pubmed: 27287487
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Apr;33(4):849-60
pubmed: 21425398
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Sep 15;76(6):438-46
pubmed: 24690112
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:113-40
pubmed: 21128784
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158680
pubmed: 27362431
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Oct;68:235-242
pubmed: 31420273
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:234-45
pubmed: 23711537
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Apr 23;673:51-55
pubmed: 29496609
PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Sep;1(4):e42
pubmed: 16201007
Neuroscientist. 2011 Oct;17(5):575-91
pubmed: 21527724
Neurobiol Aging. 2014 Nov;35(11):2646-2655
pubmed: 24970567
Crit Care. 2002 Dec;6(6):509-13
pubmed: 12493072
Molecules. 2020 May 27;25(11):
pubmed: 32471036
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Jun 02;18:1414-1428
pubmed: 32637040
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;71(2):109-18
pubmed: 24306091
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Oct;15(10):683-95
pubmed: 25186238
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Apr;39(4):1765-1776
pubmed: 29322586
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:901-11
pubmed: 23886985