Penile implants in low flow priapism.
Journal
International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
14
02
2023
accepted:
18
10
2023
revised:
15
10
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
29
10
2023
entrez:
29
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Priapism is a persistent or prolonged erection, in the absence of sexual stimulation, that fails to subside. Prolonged ischaemic or low flow priapism is defined as a full or partial erection persisting for more than 4 h and unrelated to sexual interest or stimulation, characterised by little or no cavernous blood flow. Low flow priapism leads to progressive corporal fibrosis, which could, in turn, lead to long-lasting erectile dysfunction if left untreated. Penile prosthesis implantation is recognised as a management option in refractory and delayed low flow priapism for restoring erectile function with high patient satisfaction rates. However, the ensuing corporal fibrotic scarring poses a surgical challenge to clinicians, given the higher complication rates in this patient subset. Postoperative patient satisfaction has been closely linked to preoperative expectations and perceived loss of penile length. Therefore, thorough patient counselling concerning the risk and benefits of penile implants should be a priority for all clinicians. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus on the ideal prosthesis choice and procedural timing in refractory low flow priapism. In this review, we will examine the existing literature on penile implants in patients with priapism and discuss the options for managing complications associated with penile prosthesis surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37898653
doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00787-1
pii: 10.1038/s41443-023-00787-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
651-663Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, Corona G, Jones TH, Kadioglu A, et al. Sexual and reproductive health EAU Guidelines. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health-2022. 2022. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/sexual-and-reproductive-health .
Broderick GA, Kadioglu A, Bivalacqua TJ, Ghanem H, Nehra A, Shamloul R. Priapism: pathogenesis, epidemiology, and management. J Sex Med. 2010;7:476–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2009.01625.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2009.01625.X
pubmed: 20092449
Roghmann F, Becker A, Sammon JD, Ouerghi M, Sun M, Sukumar S, et al. Incidence of priapism in emergency departments in the United States. J Urol. 2013;190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.118 .
Kulmala RV, Tamella TL. Effects of priapism lasting 24 h or longer caused by intracavernosal injection of vasoactive drugs. Int J Imp Res. 1995;7:131–6. https://europepmc.org/article/med/7496442 .
Bivalacqua TJ, Allen BK, Brock GB, Broderick GA, Chou R, Kohler TS. et al. The diagnosis and management of recurrent ischemic priapism, priapism in sickle cell patients, and non-ischemic priapism: an AUA/SMSNA guideline. J Urol. 2022;208:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002767 .
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002767
pubmed: 35536142
Ralph DJ, Borley NC, Allen C, Kirkham A, Freeman A, Minhas S. et al. The use of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients presenting with priapism. BJU Int. 2010;106:1714–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010.09368.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010.09368.X
pubmed: 20438564
Zacharakis E, Raheem AA, Freeman A, Skolarikos A, Garaffa G, Christopher AN. et al. The efficacy of the T-shunt procedure and intracavernous tunneling (snake maneuver) for refractory ischemic priapism. J Urol. 2014;191:164–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2013.07.034 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JURO.2013.07.034
pubmed: 23892191
Bennett N, Mulhall J. Sickle cell disease status and outcomes of African–American men presenting with priapism. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1244–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2008.00770.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2008.00770.X
pubmed: 18312286
Biebel MG, Gross MS, Munarriz R. Review of ischemic and non-ischemic priapism. Curr Urol Rep. 2022;23:143–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11934-022-01096-8 .
doi: 10.1007/S11934-022-01096-8
pubmed: 35536499
Spycher MA, Hauri D. The ultrastructure of the erectile tissue in priapism. J Urol. 1986;135:142–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45549-2 .
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45549-2
pubmed: 3941454
Capogrosso P, Dimitropolous K, Russo GI, Tharakan T, Milenkovic U, Cocci A, et al. Conservative and medical treatments of non-sickle cell disease-related ischemic priapism: a systematic review by the EAU Sexual and Reproductive Health Panel. Int J Impot Res. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00592-2 .
Capece M, La Rocca R, Mirone V, Bivalacqua TJ, Castiglione F, Albersen M. et al. A systematic review on ischemic priapism and immediate implantation: do we need more data?. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:530–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SXMR.2018.10.007 .
doi: 10.1016/J.SXMR.2018.10.007
pubmed: 30898595
Zacharakis E, Garaffa G, Raheem AA, Christopher AN, Muneer A, Ralph DJ. Penile prosthesis insertion in patients with refractory ischaemic priapism: early vs delayed implantation. BJU Int. 2014;114:576–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJU.12686 .
doi: 10.1111/BJU.12686
pubmed: 25383397
Shaeer O. Surgical techniques: penoscopy: optical corporotomy and resection for prosthesis implantation in cases of penile fibrosis, Shaeer’s technique. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1214–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00582.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00582.X
pubmed: 17727346
Johnson MJ, Kristinsson S, Ralph O, Chiriaco G, Ralph D. The surgical management of ischaemic priapism. Int J Imp Res. 2019;32:81–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0197-9 .
doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0197-9
Milenkovic U, Cocci A, Veeratterapillay R, Dimitropoulos K, Boeri L, Capogrosso P. et al. Surgical and minimally invasive treatment of ischaemic and non-ischaemic priapism: a systematic review by the EAU Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines panel. Int J Imp Res. 2022;20:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00604-1 .
doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00604-1
Zacharakis E, De Luca F, Raheem AA, Garaffa G, Christopher N, Muneer A, et al. Early insertion of a malleable penile prosthesis in ischaemic priapism allows later upsizing of the cylinders. Scand J Urol. 2015;49:468–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2015.1059359 .
Barham DW, Chang C, Hammad M, Pyrgidis N, Swerdloff D, Gross K. et al. Delayed placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis is associated with a high complication rate in men with a history of ischemic priapism. J Sex Med. 2023;20:1052–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/JSXMED/QDAD075 .
doi: 10.1093/JSXMED/QDAD075
pubmed: 37279440
Hebert KL, Yafi FA, Wilson S. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation into scarred corporal bodies: timing may decrease postoperative problems. BJU Int. 2020;125:168–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJU.14859 .
doi: 10.1111/BJU.14859
pubmed: 31265201
Kılıçarslan H, Kaynak Y, Gökcen K, Coşkun B, Kaygısız O. Comparison of patient satisfaction rates for the malleable and two piece-inflatable penile prostheses. Turk J Urol. 2014;40:207. https://doi.org/10.5152/TUD.2014.37108 .
doi: 10.5152/TUD.2014.37108
pubmed: 26328179
pmcid: 4548368
Bayrak O, Erturhan S, Seckiner I, Ozturk M, Sen H, Erbagci A. Comparison of the patient’s satisfaction underwent penile prosthesis; Malleable versus Ambicor: Single center experience. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020;92:25–9. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.1.25 .
doi: 10.4081/aiua.2020.1.25
pubmed: 32255323
Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Corporeal excavation: new technique for penile prosthesis implantation in men with severe corporeal fibrosis. Urology. 2006;67:1072–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2005.11.001 .
doi: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2005.11.001
pubmed: 16581112
Ralph DJ, Garaffa G, Muneer A, Freeman A, Rees R, Christopher AN. et al. The immediate insertion of a penile prosthesis for acute ischaemic priapism. Eur Urol. 2009;56:1033–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURURO.2008.09.044 .
doi: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2008.09.044
pubmed: 18930579
Capece M, Falcone M, Cai T, Palmieri A, Cocci A, La Rocca R. Penile prosthesis implantation in refractory ischaemic priapism: patient selection and special considerations. Res Rep Urol. 2022;14:1–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S278807 .
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S278807
pubmed: 35059330
pmcid: 8765601
Sedigh O, Rolle L, Negro CLA, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Galletto E, et al. Early insertion of inflatable prosthesis for intractable ischemic priapism: our experience and review of the literature. Int J Impot Res. 2011;23:158–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/IJIR.2011.23 .
Hinds PR, Wilson SK, Sadeghi-Nejad H. Dilemmas of inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: what practices achieve the best outcomes and the lowest infection rates? (CME). J Sex Med. 2012;9:2483–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2012.02932.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2012.02932.X
pubmed: 23046282
Krughoff K, Bearelly P, Apoj M, Munarriz NA, Thirumavalavan N, Pan S. et al. Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41443-020-00373-9 .
doi: 10.1038/S41443-020-00373-9
pubmed: 33204006
Baumgarten AS, VanDyke ME, Yi YA, Keith CG, Fuchs JS, Ortiz NM, et al. Favourable multi-institutional experience with penoscrotal decompression for prolonged ischaemic priapism. BJU Int. 2020;126. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15127 .
Garaffa G, Ralph DJ. Penile prosthesis implantation in acute and chronic priapism. Sex Med Rev. 2013;1:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMRJ.10 .
doi: 10.1002/SMRJ.10
pubmed: 27784586
Chung E, Bettocchi C, Egydio P, Love C, Osmonov D, Park S. et al. The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant. Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:534–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-022-00607-z .
doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00607-z
pubmed: 35711059
Cayetano-Alcaraz AA, Tharakan T, Chen R, Sofikitis N, Minhas S. The management of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes mellitus unresponsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Andrology. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1111/ANDR.13257 .
doi: 10.1111/ANDR.13257
pubmed: 35929992
Nahrstadt BC. Informed consent for penile prosthesis. Int J Imp Res. 2008;21:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2008.63 .
doi: 10.1038/ijir.2008.63
Hellstrom WJG, Montague DK, Moncada I, Carson C, Minhas S, Faria G. et al. Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:501–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2009.01626.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2009.01626.X
pubmed: 20092450
Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Harsch MR. Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup. J Urol. 2011;185:614–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2010.09.094 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JURO.2010.09.094
pubmed: 21168870
Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1503–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2008.00819.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2008.00819.X
pubmed: 18410306
Ferguson KH, Cespedes RD. Prospective long-term results and quality-of-life assessment after Dura-II penile prosthesis placement. Urology. 2003;61:437–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02270-7 .
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02270-7
pubmed: 12597963
Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001;166:932–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65867-3 .
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65867-3
pubmed: 11490249
Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2007;177:262–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2006.08.094 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JURO.2006.08.094
pubmed: 17162061
Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, Corbu C, Campo B, Ordesi G. et al. AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol. 2000;37:50–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000020099 .
doi: 10.1159/000020099
pubmed: 10671785
Rajpurkar A, Dhabuwala CB. Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. J Urol. 2003;170:159–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000072524.82345.6D .
doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000072524.82345.6D
pubmed: 12796670
Narang GL, Figler BD, Coward RM. Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S869–80. https://doi.org/10.21037/TAU.2017.07.04 .
doi: 10.21037/TAU.2017.07.04
pubmed: 29238666
pmcid: 5715186
Chason J, Sausville J, Kramer AC. Penile prosthesis implantation compares favorably in malpractice outcomes to other common urological procedures: findings from a malpractice insurance database. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2111–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2009.01317.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2009.01317.X
pubmed: 19453882
Stelfox HT, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Gustafson ML. The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits. Am J Med. 2005;118:1126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJMED.2005.01.060 .
doi: 10.1016/J.AMJMED.2005.01.060
pubmed: 16194644
Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1880–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2011.02281.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2011.02281.X
pubmed: 21492405
Tsambarlis PN, Chaus F, Levine LA. Successful placement of penile prostheses in men with severe corporal fibrosis following vacuum therapy protocol. J Sex Med. 2017;14:44–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSXM.2016.11.304 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JSXM.2016.11.304
pubmed: 27938991
Garber BB, Lim C. Inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in men with severe intracorporal fibrosis. Curr Urol. 2017;10:92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447158 .
doi: 10.1159/000447158
pubmed: 28785194
pmcid: 5527169
Lopes EJA, Kuwano AY, Guimaraes AN, Flores JP, Jacobino MAO. Corporoplasty using bovine pericardium grafts in complex penile prosthesis implantation surgery. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382009000100008 .
doi: 10.1590/S1677-55382009000100008
pubmed: 19254398
Shaeer O. Implantation of penile prosthesis in cases of corporeal fibrosis: modified Shaeer’s excavation technique. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2470–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2008.00912.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2008.00912.X
pubmed: 18624970
Durazi MH, Jalal AA. Penile prosthesis implantation for treatment of postpriapism erectile dysfunction. Urol J. 2008;5:115–9.
pubmed: 18592465
Park JK, Kim HJ, Kang MH, Jeong YB. Implantation of penile prosthesis in a patient with severe corporeal fibrosis induced by cavernosal injection therapy. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:545–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.IJIR.3900930 .
doi: 10.1038/SJ.IJIR.3900930
pubmed: 12494294
Ghanem H, Ghazy S, El-Meliegy A. Corporeal counter incisions: a simplified approach to penile prosthesis implantation in fibrotic cases. Int J Imp Res. 2000;12:153–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900517 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900517
Rajpurkar A, LI Haikun, Dhabuwala CB. Penile implant success in patients with corporal fibrosis using multiple incisions and minimal scar tissue excision. Urology. 1999;54:145–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00060-6 .
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00060-6
pubmed: 10414742
Knoll LD, Furlow WL, Benson RC, Bilhartz DL. Management of nondilatable cavernous fibrosis with the use of a downsized inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1995;153:366–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199502000-00020 .
doi: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00020
pubmed: 7815585
Salman B, Elsherif E, Elgharabawy M, Badawy A. Early versus delayed penile prosthesis insertion for refractory ischemic priapism. https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2022.2135290 .
Palmisano F, Vagnoni V, Franceschelli A, Gentile G, Colombo F. Immediate insertion of a soft penile prosthesis as a new option for a safe and cost-effective treatment of refractory ischemic priapism. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021;93:356–60. https://doi.org/10.4081/AIUA.2021.3.356 .
doi: 10.4081/AIUA.2021.3.356
pubmed: 34839644
Johnson M, Hallerstrom M, Chiriaco G, Johnson T, Zacharakis E, Raheem A, et al. Pd44-01 a comparison between early and delayed penile prosthesis insertion in men with refractory ischaemic priapism. J Urol. 2019;201. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000556615.02106.6C .
Zacharakis E, de Luca F, Raheem AA, Garaffa G, Christopher N, Muneer A. et al. Early insertion of a malleable penile prosthesis in ischaemic priapism allows later upsizing of the cylinders. Scand J Urol. 2015;49:468–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2015.1059359 .
doi: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1059359
pubmed: 26116193
Tausch TJ, Zhao LC, Morey AF, Siegel JA, Belsante MJ, Seideman CA. et al. Malleable penile prosthesis is a cost-effective treatment for refractory ischemic priapism. J Sex Med. 2015;12:824–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/JSM.12803 .
doi: 10.1111/JSM.12803
pubmed: 25536880
Faddan AA, Aksenov AV, Naumann CM, Jünemann KP, Osmonov DK. Semi-rigid penile prosthesis as a salvage management of idiopathic ischemic stuttering priapism. Res Rep Urol. 2015;2015:137–41. https://doaj.org/article/8856d800a20a45cab82cbc8e94620626 .
Salem EA, el Aasser O. Management of ischemic priapism by penile prosthesis insertion: prevention of distal erosion. J Urol. 2010;183:2300–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2010.02.014 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JURO.2010.02.014
pubmed: 20400140
Rees RW, Kalsi J, Minhas S, Peters J, Kell P, Ralph DJ. The management of low-flow priapism with the immediate insertion of a penile prosthesis. BJU Int. 2002;90:893–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1464-410X.2002.03058.X .
doi: 10.1046/J.1464-410X.2002.03058.X
pubmed: 12460352
Fuchs JS, Shakir N, McKibben MJ, Mathur S, Teeple S, Scott JM. et al. Penoscrotal decompression-promising new treatment paradigm for refractory ischemic priapism. J Sex Med. 2018;15:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSXM.2018.02.010 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JSXM.2018.02.010
pubmed: 29550463
Razzaghi MR, Rezaei A, Javanmard B, Mazloomfard MM, Lotfi B. S105 the immediate insertion of a penile prosthesis for prolonged ischemic priapism. Eur Urol Suppl. 2010;9:584. https://www.academia.edu/5587502/S105_THE_IMMEDIATE_INSERTION_OF_A_PENILE_PROSTHESIS_FOR_PROLONGED_ISCHEMIC_PRIAPISM .
doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(10)61390-5
Sundaram CP, Fernandes ET, Ercole C, Billups KL. Management of refractory priapism with penile prostheses. Br J Urol. 1997;79:659. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1464-410X.1997.00168.X .
doi: 10.1046/J.1464-410X.1997.00168.X
pubmed: 9126109
Mireku-Boateng A, Jackson AG. Penile prosthesis in the management of priapism. Urol Int. 1989;44:247–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000281515 .
doi: 10.1159/000281515
pubmed: 2800061
Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJG. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med. 2013;10:893–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/JSM.12115 .
doi: 10.1111/JSM.12115
pubmed: 23551538
Helo S, Clavell-Hernandez J, Wilson SK, Köhler TS. Penile prosthesis implantation in complex and previously failed settings. Textbook Male Genitourethral Reconstruction. 2020;589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_46 .
Dropkin BM, Chertack NA, Nealon SW, Joice GA, Morey AF. The hostile penis: managing the patient with corporal fibrosis. Penile Implant Surg. 2022;97–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82363-4_7 .
Yücel ÖB, Pazır Y, Kadıoğlu A. Penile prosthesis implantation in priapism. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:310–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SXMR.2017.08.002 .
doi: 10.1016/J.SXMR.2017.08.002
pubmed: 28916463
Welliver RC, Fonseca AN, West BL, McVary KT, Köhler TS. Autoinflation leading to failure of two-piece ambicor implantable penile prosthesis: an outcome from a methodical treatment of recalcitrant stuttering priapism. Case Rep Urol. 2014;2014:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/529037 .
doi: 10.1155/2014/529037
Levine LA, Becher E, Bella A, Brant W, Kohler T, Martinez-Salamanca JI. et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13:489–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSXM.2016.01.017 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JSXM.2016.01.017
pubmed: 27045255
Eid JF. No-touch technique. J Sex Med. 2011;8:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2010.02137.X .
doi: 10.1111/J.1743-6109.2010.02137.X
pubmed: 21199375
Eid JF. Penile implant: review of a ‘no-touch’ technique. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:294–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SXMR.2016.01.002 .
doi: 10.1016/J.SXMR.2016.01.002
pubmed: 27871962
Lee I, Agarwal RK, Lee BY, Fishman NO, Umscheid CA. Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:1219–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/657134 .
doi: 10.1086/657134
pubmed: 20969449
Sidabutar KE, Wallen JJ, Henry GD. Critical analysis of maneuvers to reduce infection in penile implant surgery. Penile Implant Surg. 2022:17–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82363-4_2 .