Assessment of bony changes in temporomandibular joint in patients using cone beam computed tomography - a cross sectional study.
Male
Humans
Female
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Osteophyte
/ diagnostic imaging
Hyperplasia
/ pathology
Sclerosis
/ pathology
Osteoarthritis
/ pathology
Tooth Ankylosis
Temporomandibular Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
/ methods
Cysts
Ankylosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Mandibular Condyle
Journal
Head & face medicine
ISSN: 1746-160X
Titre abrégé: Head Face Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Oct 2023
28 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
15
08
2023
accepted:
11
10
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
29
10
2023
entrez:
29
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and the relationship between age, sex, and types of TMJ change using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). CBCT records of 200 patients (123 women and 67 men) were retrieved and assessed. Right and left TMJs were evaluated separately, resulting in a total of 400 TMJs. The images were analyzed using On demand 3D Application The radiographic findings were classified as erosion, proliferative changes mainly, including flattening and osteophytes of the condyle, sclerosis, Ely cyst, hypoplasia and hyperplasia of the condyles, ankylosis, and joint cavity. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, paired T-tests, and repeated measure ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) in SPSS Software. The most prevalent types of condylar bony changes observed was osteophyte (63.5%) followed by flattening of the articular surface (42%), erosion (40%), ankylosis (10%) and sclerosis (10%). 7.5% of joints showed hyperplastic condyles but only 2% showed hypoplasia. The least prevalent change observed was Ely Cyst (1%). Osteophyte was the most prevalent change observed in all age groups and both sexes except for men aged 31 ~ 50, where flattening was more frequent. A statistically significant difference was found between sex and prevalence of erosion in the age group of 10 ~ 30 (P = 0.001); as well as between sex and condylar hyperplasia in the same age group. Based on the findings of this research, the prevalence of bony changes of TMJ from highest to lowest is as follows: osteophyte, flattening of the articular surface, erosion, ankylosis, sclerosis, hyperplastic condyles, hypoplastic condyles and Ely Cyst. CBCT is an accurate 3 dimensional imaging modality for assessment of TMJ bony structures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and the relationship between age, sex, and types of TMJ change using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
METHODS AND MATERIAL
METHODS
CBCT records of 200 patients (123 women and 67 men) were retrieved and assessed. Right and left TMJs were evaluated separately, resulting in a total of 400 TMJs. The images were analyzed using On demand 3D Application The radiographic findings were classified as erosion, proliferative changes mainly, including flattening and osteophytes of the condyle, sclerosis, Ely cyst, hypoplasia and hyperplasia of the condyles, ankylosis, and joint cavity. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, paired T-tests, and repeated measure ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) in SPSS Software.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The most prevalent types of condylar bony changes observed was osteophyte (63.5%) followed by flattening of the articular surface (42%), erosion (40%), ankylosis (10%) and sclerosis (10%). 7.5% of joints showed hyperplastic condyles but only 2% showed hypoplasia. The least prevalent change observed was Ely Cyst (1%). Osteophyte was the most prevalent change observed in all age groups and both sexes except for men aged 31 ~ 50, where flattening was more frequent. A statistically significant difference was found between sex and prevalence of erosion in the age group of 10 ~ 30 (P = 0.001); as well as between sex and condylar hyperplasia in the same age group.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings of this research, the prevalence of bony changes of TMJ from highest to lowest is as follows: osteophyte, flattening of the articular surface, erosion, ankylosis, sclerosis, hyperplastic condyles, hypoplastic condyles and Ely Cyst. CBCT is an accurate 3 dimensional imaging modality for assessment of TMJ bony structures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37898789
doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00392-z
pii: 10.1186/s13005-023-00392-z
pmc: PMC10612346
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
47Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Jan;41(1):24-9
pubmed: 22184625
Niger J Clin Pract. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):259-66
pubmed: 26856292
Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Dec;42(4):249-53
pubmed: 23301212
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Mar;38(3):141-7
pubmed: 19225084
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Feb;51(2):206-213
pubmed: 34074575
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Sep;114(3):e51-7
pubmed: 22771410
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Mar;24(1):12-18
pubmed: 36864989
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 06;11(3):
pubmed: 33800948
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 Dec;36(8):472-7
pubmed: 18033943
Acta Odontol Scand. 2023 Oct;81(7):562-568
pubmed: 37211630
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jan;66(1):77-84
pubmed: 18083419
Cranio. 1997 Jul;15(3):229-35
pubmed: 9586502
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1343.e1-8
pubmed: 26899480
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;67(9):1966-78
pubmed: 19686936
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):e393-414
pubmed: 24278954
Eur J Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):99-105
pubmed: 28435374
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Oct;44(10):1268-74
pubmed: 26194774
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Feb;111(2):e27-34
pubmed: 21237425
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul 5;39(1):19
pubmed: 28730147
Imaging Sci Dent. 2019 Sep;49(3):179-190
pubmed: 31583200
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Apr;27(4):876-887
pubmed: 33879010
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):291-305
pubmed: 9260045
Cureus. 2022 Nov 14;14(11):e31515
pubmed: 36532912
Ann Anat. 2016 Jan;203:52-8
pubmed: 25899341
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 01;2022:6863014
pubmed: 35155678
Br Dent J. 2022 Oct;233(7):539-546
pubmed: 36241801
Dent J (Basel). 2019 May 02;7(2):
pubmed: 31052495