Mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant comparisons: two-year clinical outcomes.
Function
Glenoid process
Patient outcome
Quality of life
Scapular notching
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2023
29 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
03
07
2023
accepted:
02
10
2023
medline:
29
10
2023
pubmed:
29
10
2023
entrez:
29
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Augmented glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implants may decrease the mechanical impingement that creates scapular notching and improve shoulder function. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of three different RTSA glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray combinations for patient-reported shoulder function, pain and instability, radiographic imaging evidence of glenoid baseplate or humeral stem subsidence and migration, bony changes associated with implant loosening, and scapular notching over the initial 2 years post-RTSA. Primary outcomes included active shoulder mobility, perceived function, pain, instability, scapular notching, and implant survival. Sixty-seven patients from 6 research sites received one of three different glenoid baseplate and humeral tray combinations. Group 1 (n = 21) received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray; Group 2 (n = 23) received a standard glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options; Group 3 (n = 23) received both a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options. Subjects underwent radiologic evaluation, completed the ASES scale, the EQ-5D-5L quality of life scale, VAS shoulder pain and instability questions, and active shoulder mobility measurements pre-operatively, and 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-2 years post-RTSA. Improved active shoulder mobility, quality of life, perceived function, decreased shoulder pain and instability, excellent implant survival and minimal scapular notching were observed for all groups. Group 3 had better overall active shoulder mobility than the other groups and better perceived function than Group 1. The group that received the mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray combination had better overall active shoulder flexion, external rotation at 90° abduction, and internal rotation. This group also had better perceived shoulder function compared to the group that received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Augmented glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implants may decrease the mechanical impingement that creates scapular notching and improve shoulder function. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of three different RTSA glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray combinations for patient-reported shoulder function, pain and instability, radiographic imaging evidence of glenoid baseplate or humeral stem subsidence and migration, bony changes associated with implant loosening, and scapular notching over the initial 2 years post-RTSA. Primary outcomes included active shoulder mobility, perceived function, pain, instability, scapular notching, and implant survival.
METHODS
METHODS
Sixty-seven patients from 6 research sites received one of three different glenoid baseplate and humeral tray combinations. Group 1 (n = 21) received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray; Group 2 (n = 23) received a standard glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options; Group 3 (n = 23) received both a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options. Subjects underwent radiologic evaluation, completed the ASES scale, the EQ-5D-5L quality of life scale, VAS shoulder pain and instability questions, and active shoulder mobility measurements pre-operatively, and 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-2 years post-RTSA.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Improved active shoulder mobility, quality of life, perceived function, decreased shoulder pain and instability, excellent implant survival and minimal scapular notching were observed for all groups. Group 3 had better overall active shoulder mobility than the other groups and better perceived function than Group 1.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The group that received the mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray combination had better overall active shoulder flexion, external rotation at 90° abduction, and internal rotation. This group also had better perceived shoulder function compared to the group that received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37898968
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03757-x
pii: 10.1007/s00590-023-03757-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Sears BW, Johnston PS, Ramsey ML, Williams GR (2012) Glenoid bone loss in primary total shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(9):604–613
pubmed: 22941803
doi: 10.5435/00124635-201209000-00007
Jones RB, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD (2016) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with structural bone grafting of large glenoid defects. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(9):1425–1432
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.016
Ernstbrunner L, Werthel JD, Wagner E, Hatta T, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2017) Glenoid bone grafting in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(8):1441–1447
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.011
Friedman LGM, Garrigues GE (2021) Management of humeral and glenoid bone defects in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29(17):e846–e859
pubmed: 34192726
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00964
Neer CS, Morrison DS (1988) Glenoid bone-grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1154–1162
pubmed: 3047131
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198870080-00006
Lanham NS, Peterson JR, Ahmed R, Jobin CM, Levine WN (2022) Comparison of glenoid bone grafting versus augmented glenoid baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg S1058–2746(22)00326–3
Gerber C, Pennington SD, Nyffeler RW (2009) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(5):284–295
pubmed: 19411640
doi: 10.5435/00124635-200905000-00003
Nicholson GP, Strauss EJ, Sherman SL (2011) Scapular notching: recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2521–2530
pubmed: 21128030
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1720-y
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) (2020) Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty: 2020 annual report. AOA; 2000. P 8 https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annualreports 2020
Denard PJ, Walch G (2013) Current concepts in the surgical management of primary glenohumeral arthritis with a bioconcave glenoid. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(11):1589–1598
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.017
Hsu JE, Ricchetti ET, Huffman GR, Iannotti JP, Glaser DL (2013) Addressing glenoid bone deficiency and asymmetric posterior erosion in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(9):1298–1308
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.014
McFarland EG, Meshram P, Rojas J, Joseph J, Srikumaran U (2021) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without bone-grafting for severe glenoid bone loss in patients with osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff: a concise 5-year follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 103(7):581–585
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01042
Ghoraishian M, Abboud JA, Romeo AA, Williams GR, Namdari S (2019) Augmented glenoid implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: review of available implants and current literature. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28:387–395
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.017
Gilot GJ (2013) Addressing glenoid erosion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71(Suppl 2):S51–S53
Gutiérrez S, Comiskey CA 4th, Luo ZP, Pupello DR, Frankle MA (2008) Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(12):2606–2615
pubmed: 19047705
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00012
Klein SM, Dunning P, Mulieri P, Pupello D, Downes K, Frankle MA (2010) Effects of acquired glenoid bone defects on surgical technique and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(5):1144–1154
pubmed: 20439660
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00778
Malahias M-A, Chytas D, Kostretzis L, Brilakis E, Fandridis E, Hantes M, Antonogiannakis E (2020) Bone grafting in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of glenoid bone loss: a systematic review. J Orthop 20:78–86
pubmed: 32042234
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.12.005
Seidl AJ, Williams GR, Boileau P (2016) Challenges in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: addressing glenoid bone loss. Orthopedics 39(1):14–23
pubmed: 26821223
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160111-01
Simon P, Diaz M, Cusick M, Santoni B, Frankle M (2018) 3D image-based morphometric analysis of the scapular neck length in subjects undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Anat 31(1):43–55
pubmed: 28514491
doi: 10.1002/ca.22911
Kolmodin J, Davidson IU, Jun BJ, Sodhi N, Subhas N, Patterson TE, Li ZM, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET (2018) Scapular notching after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: prediction using patient-specific osseous anatomy, implant location, and shoulder motion. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100(13):1095–1103
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00242
Kowalsky MS, Galatz LM, Shia DS, Steger-May K, Keener JD (2012) The relationship between scapular notching and reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis design. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(10):1430–1441
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.051
Werner BC, Wong AC, Mahony GT, Craig EV, Dines DM, Warren RF, Gulotta LV (2016) Causes of poor postoperative improvement after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(8):e217–e222
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.002
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Molé D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86(3):388–395
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14024
Smith T, Bäunker A, Krämer M, Hurschler C, Kaufmann M, Pastor MF, Wellmann M (2015) Biomechanical evaluation of inferior scapula notching of reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and scapula neck anatomy. Int J Shoulder Surg 9(4):103–109
pubmed: 26622125
pmcid: 4639998
doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.167932
Spiry C, Berhouet J, Agout C, Bacle G, Favard L (2021) Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 45(6):1559–1566
pubmed: 33723643
doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-04998-3
Zitkovsky HS, Carducci MP, Mahendraraj KA, Grubhofer F, Jawa A (2020) Lateralization and decreased neck-shaft angle reduces scapular notching and heterotopic ossification. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28(23):e1073–e1080
pubmed: 32271176
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00808
Friedman RJ, Barcel DA, Eichinger JK (2019) Scapular notching in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(6):200–209
pubmed: 30260909
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00026
Jang YH, Lee JH, Kim SH (2020) Effect of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 102B(11):1438–1445
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0449.R1
Navarro RA (2021) Long-term value may determine if RTSA for cuff-intact osteoarthritis with glenoid defects does not require bone grafts or augments: commentary on an article by Edward G. McFarland, MD, et al.: “reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without bone-grafting for severe glenoid bone loss in patients with osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff. A concise 5-year follow-up of a previous report.” J Bone Jt Surg Am 103(7):e30
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00078
Simovitch R, Flurin PH, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Roche C (2019) Impact of scapular notching on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty midterm outcomes: 5-year minimum follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28(12):2301–2307
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.042
Arashiro Y, Izaki T, Miyake S, Shibata T, Yoshimura I, Yamamoto T (2022) Influence of scapular neck length on the extent of impingement-free adduction after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 31(1):185–191
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.005
Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Romeo AA (2016) The effect of humeral inclination on range of motion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 45(4):E174-179
pubmed: 27327922
Lévigne C, Boileau P, Favard L, Garaud P, Molé D, Sirveaux F, Walch G (2008) Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17(6):925–935
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.010
Zimmer Biomet Reverse Shoulder System Surgical Technique. https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zimmer-biomet-OUS-Surg-techniques/shoulder/comprehensive-reverse-shoulder-system-surgical-technique1.pdf . Downloaded from website on February 10. 2023
Boudreau S, Boudreau ED, Higgins LD, Wilcox RB 3rd (2007) Rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37(12):734–743
pubmed: 18560182
doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2562
Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD (1994) A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elb Surg 3(6):347–352
doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0
Mitsukane M, Suzuki K, Tabe R, Hasumi F, Fukushima D (2022) Normalized hand-behind-back for the measurement of shoulder internal rotation. JSES Int 6(2):287–291
pubmed: 35252928
pmcid: 8888165
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.001
Bercik MJ, Kruse KH, Yalizis M, Gauci MO, Chaoui J, Walch G (2016) A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(10):1601–1606
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.010
Iannotti J, Jun B, Patterson T, Ricchetti E (2017) Quantitative measurement of osseous pathology in advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Jt Surg 99(17):1460–1468
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00869
Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14(6):756–760
doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90232-2
Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multiva Behav Res 46(3):399–424
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
Bauer JA, Slowinski JJ, Feng L, Sperling JW, Duquin TR (2022) Optimizing glenoid bone preservation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using augmented baseplates. JSES Rev Rep Tech 3(1):77–82
pubmed: 37588078
pmcid: 10426689
Liou W, Yang Y, Petersen-Fitts GR, Lombardo DJ, Stine S, Sabesan VJ (2017) Effect of lateralized design on muscle and joint reaction forces for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(4):564–572
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.045
Berhouet J, Kontaxis A, Gulotta LV, Craig E, Warren R, Dines J, Dines D (2015) Effects of the humeral tray component positioning for onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty design: a biomechanical analysis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24(4):569–577
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.022
Colasanti CA, Lin CC, Ross KA, Luthringer T, Elwell JA, Roche CP, Virk MS, Simovitch RW, Routman HD, Zuckerman JD (2023) Augmented baseplates yield optimum outcomes when compared with bone graft augmentation for managing glenoid deformity during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 32(5):958–971
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.015
Michael RJ, Schoch BS, King JJ, Wright TW (2018) Managing glenoid bone deficiency-the augment experience in anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ). https://doi.org/10.12788/ajo.2018.0014
doi: 10.12788/ajo.2018.0014
pubmed: 29611851
Wright TW, Grey SG, Roche CP, Wright L, Flurin PH, Zuckerman JD (2015) Preliminary results of a posterior augmented glenoid compared to an all polyethylene standard glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 73(Suppl 1):S79-S85
Tashjian RZ, Broshinsky K, Stertz I, Chalmers PN (2020) Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(3):534–540
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.011
Ho JC, Sabesan VJ, Iannotti JP (2013) Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(12):e82
pubmed: 23783213
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00336
Ho JC, Thakar O, Chan WW, Nicholson T, Williams GR, Namdari S (2020) Early radiographic failure of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with structural bone graft for glenoid bone loss. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(3):550–560
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.035