Influence of macular pigment on the sensitivity to discomfort glare from daylight.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 10 2023
29 10 2023
Historique:
received:
15
06
2023
accepted:
24
10
2023
medline:
31
10
2023
pubmed:
30
10
2023
entrez:
30
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Understanding the factors that influence the human perception of glare is necessary to properly address glare risks in buildings and achieve comfortable visual environments, especially in the workplace. Yet large inter-individual variabilities in glare perception remain unexplained and thus uncovered by the current empirical glare models. We hypothesize that this variability has an origin in the human retina, in particular in the density of macular pigments present in its central area, which varies between individuals. Macular pigments are known to absorb blue light and attenuate chromatic aberration, thus reducing light scatter. This study presents the outcomes of the first experiment ever conducted in a daylit office environment, in which glare sensitivity and macular pigment density were measured and compared for 110 young healthy individuals, along with other ocular parameters. The participants were exposed to different glare conditions induced by the sun filtered through either color-neutral or blue-colored glazing. In neutral daylight conditions with sun disc in the near periphery, neither macular pigment nor any other investigated ocular factors have an impact on discomfort glare perception whereas glare perception in conditions with the blue-colored sun disc in the near periphery was found to be correlated with macular pigment optical density.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37899478
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45785-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-45785-x
pmc: PMC10613614
doi:
Substances chimiques
Macular Pigment
0
Retinal Pigments
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18551Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2015 Apr 1;32(4):576-85
pubmed: 26366766
Vision Res. 2010 Mar 31;50(7):716-28
pubmed: 19854211
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004 Sep;23(5):533-59
pubmed: 15302350
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Oct;45(10):3838-48
pubmed: 15452096
Am J Psychol. 1987 Fall-Winter;100(3-4):441-71
pubmed: 3322052
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Feb;39(2):397-406
pubmed: 9478000
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Mar;29(2):127-37
pubmed: 19236582
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep 19;54(9):6298-306
pubmed: 23982840
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 18;50(13):1249-56
pubmed: 20394766
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 22;52(10):7406-15
pubmed: 21296819
J Food Sci. 2010 Jan-Feb;75(1):R24-9
pubmed: 20492192
Exp Eye Res. 2005 Nov;81(5):602-9
pubmed: 16024015
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 17;54(1):476-81
pubmed: 23211814
J Optom. 2021 Jan - Mar;14(1):92-99
pubmed: 32868244
Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;116(2):227-33
pubmed: 9488276
Vision Res. 2006 Dec;46(28):4615-22
pubmed: 17087988
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Feb;85(2):82-8
pubmed: 18296924
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;153(4):587-93
pubmed: 22445628
Sci Rep. 2019 May 20;9(1):7568
pubmed: 31110303
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Jun;37(7):1236-49
pubmed: 8641827
Int J Chronobiol. 1976;4(2):97-110
pubmed: 1027738
Optom Vis Sci. 1996 Jan;73(1):49-53
pubmed: 8867682