Alcohol Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Alcohol-related Liver Disease: A Comparative Assessment of Relapse Prediction Models.


Journal

Transplantation
ISSN: 1534-6080
Titre abrégé: Transplantation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0132144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Oct 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 30 10 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
entrez: 30 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The selection of liver transplant (LT) candidates with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is influenced by the risk of alcohol relapse (AR), yet the ability to predict AR is limited. We evaluate psychosocial factors associated with post-LT AR and compare the performance of high-risk alcoholism risk (HRAR), sustained alcohol use post-LT (SALT), and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) scores in predicting relapse. A retrospective analysis of ALD patients undergoing LT from 2015 to 2021 at a single US transplant center was performed. Risk factors associated with post-LT AR were evaluated and test characteristics of 3 prediction models were compared. Of 219 ALD LT recipients, 23 (11%) had AR during a median study follow-up of 37.5 mo. On multivariate analysis, comorbid psychiatric illness (odds ratio 5.22) and continued alcohol use after advice from a health care provider (odds ratio 3.8) were found to be significantly associated with post-LT AR. On sensitivity analysis, SIPAT of 30 was optimal on discriminating between ALD LT recipients with and without post-LT AR. SIPAT outperformed both the HRAR and SALT scores (c-statistic 0.67 versus 0.59 and 0.62, respectively) in identifying post-LT AR. However, all scores had poor positive predictive value (<25%). AR after LT is associated with comorbid psychiatric illness and lack of heeding health care provider advice to abstain from alcohol. Although SIPAT outperformed the HRAR and SALT scores in predicting AR, all are poor predictors. The current tools to predict post-LT AR should not be used to exclude LT candidacy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The selection of liver transplant (LT) candidates with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is influenced by the risk of alcohol relapse (AR), yet the ability to predict AR is limited. We evaluate psychosocial factors associated with post-LT AR and compare the performance of high-risk alcoholism risk (HRAR), sustained alcohol use post-LT (SALT), and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) scores in predicting relapse.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective analysis of ALD patients undergoing LT from 2015 to 2021 at a single US transplant center was performed. Risk factors associated with post-LT AR were evaluated and test characteristics of 3 prediction models were compared.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 219 ALD LT recipients, 23 (11%) had AR during a median study follow-up of 37.5 mo. On multivariate analysis, comorbid psychiatric illness (odds ratio 5.22) and continued alcohol use after advice from a health care provider (odds ratio 3.8) were found to be significantly associated with post-LT AR. On sensitivity analysis, SIPAT of 30 was optimal on discriminating between ALD LT recipients with and without post-LT AR. SIPAT outperformed both the HRAR and SALT scores (c-statistic 0.67 versus 0.59 and 0.62, respectively) in identifying post-LT AR. However, all scores had poor positive predictive value (<25%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
AR after LT is associated with comorbid psychiatric illness and lack of heeding health care provider advice to abstain from alcohol. Although SIPAT outperformed the HRAR and SALT scores in predicting AR, all are poor predictors. The current tools to predict post-LT AR should not be used to exclude LT candidacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37899485
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004800
pii: 00007890-990000000-00578
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Références

Beresford TP, Everson GT. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: bias, beliefs, 6-month rule, and relapse—but where are the data? Liver Transpl. 2000;6:777–778.
Gish RG, Lee A, Brooks L, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients diagnosed with alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse who were evaluated for liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:581–587.
Egawa H, Nishimura K, Teramukai S, et al. Risk factors for alcohol relapse after liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis in Japan. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:298–310.
Pfitzmann R, Schwenzer J, Rayes N, et al. Long-term survival and predictors of relapse after orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:197–205.
De Gottardi A, Spahr L, Gelez P, et al. A simple score for predicting alcohol relapse after liver transplantation: results from 387 patients over 15 years. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1183–1188.
Dew MA, DiMartini AF, Steel J, et al. Meta-analysis of risk for relapse to substance use after transplantation of the liver or other solid organs. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:159–172.
Karim Z, Intaraprasong P, Scudamore CH, et al. Predictors of relapse to significant alcohol drinking after liver transplantation. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010;24:245–250.
Deutsch-Link S, Weinrieb RM, Jones LS, et al. Prior relapse, ongoing alcohol consumption, and failure to engage in treatment predict alcohol relapse after liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:2089–2103.
Lee BP, Vittinghoff E, Hsu C, et al. Predicting low-risk for sustained alcohol use after early liver transplant for acute alcoholic hepatitis: the SALT Score. Hepatology. 2019;69:1477–1487.
Yates WR, Booth BM, Reed DA, et al. Descriptive and predictive validity of a high-risk alcoholism relapse model. J Stud Alcohol. 1993;54:645–651.
Lombardo-Quezada J, Colmenero J, López-Pelayo H, et al. Prediction of alcohol relapse among liver transplant candidates with less than 6 months of abstinence using the high-risk alcoholism relapse score. Liver Transpl. 2019;25:1142–1154.
Chuncharunee L, Yamashiki N, Thakkinstian A, et al. Alcohol relapse and its predictors after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19:150.
Deutsch-Link S, Weinberg EM, Bittermann T, et al. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant is associated with outcomes before and after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2021;27:652–667.
Jauhar S, Talwalkar JA, Schneekloth T, et al. Analysis of factors that predict alcohol relapse following liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:408–411.
Rice BA, Mehta N, Grab J, et al. Patient survey augments detection of harmful alcohol relapse after liver transplant for alcohol-associated cirrhosis. Hepatol Commun. 2023;7:e0126.
Mathurin P, Moreno C, Samuel D, et al. Early liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1790–1800.
Asrani SK, Trotter J, Lake J, et al. Meeting report: the Dallas Consensus Conference on Liver Transplantation for Alcohol Associated Hepatitis. Liver Transpl. 2020;26:127–140.
Lim JK, Keeffe EB. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: current concepts and length of sobriety. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:S31–S38.
Mackie J, Groves K, Hoyle A, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: a retrospective analysis of survival, recidivism, and risk factors predisposing to recidivism. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:418–427.
Dimartini A, Weinrieb R, Fireman M. Liver transplantation in patients with alcohol and other substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002;25:195–209.
Shen NT, Shenoy A, Brown RS, et al. Identifying risk of alcohol relapse after liver transplantation: what tools do we need? Liver Transpl. 2019;25:1133–1135.
Neuberger J. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: what is the risk and consequence of relapse? Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:1600–1607.
Lim J, Curry MP, Sundaram V. Risk factors and outcomes associated with alcohol relapse after liver transplantation. World J Hepatol. 2017;9:771–780.

Auteurs

Mai Sedki (M)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Allison Kwong (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Meera Bhargava (M)

Department of Medicine, Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Palo Alto, CA.

Aijaz Ahmed (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Tami Daugherty (T)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Paul Kwo (P)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Deepti Dronamraju (D)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Radhika Kumari (R)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

W Ray Kim (WR)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Carlos Esquivel (C)

Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Marc Melcher (M)

Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

C Andrew Bonham (CA)

Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Amy Gallo (A)

Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Ashly Nelson (A)

Department of Social Work, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA.

Amanda Norwood (A)

Department of Social Work, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA.

Filza Hussain (F)

Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Aparna Goel (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Classifications MeSH