Gender trait preferences among smallholder cowpea farmers in northern Ghana: lessons from a case study.
cowpea breeding
gender lens
gender-responsive breeding
gendered institutions
production constraints
trait preferences
Journal
Frontiers in sociology
ISSN: 2297-7775
Titre abrégé: Front Sociol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101777459
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
17
07
2023
accepted:
21
09
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
30
10
2023
entrez:
30
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This case study reports on how a gender responsive breeding program contributes to meeting the trait preference of men and women for improved cowpea varieties in northern Ghana. Fifty-eight early-maturing, medium-maturing and dual-purpose cowpea lines were planted at the CSIR-SARI research fields and women and men farmers invited for participatory plant breeding (PPB) in 2016. Selected lines from the PPB were further evaluated in 2017 using participatory varietal selection (PVS) in 5 districts in northern Ghana. In addition, 20 focus group discussions (FGDs) were held in 2018 in 10 randomly selected communities with 260 participants (130 women and 130 men) across the districts where the PVS had been held previously. The study finds drought tolerance, short cooking time and pest resistance to be the most preferred cowpea traits among both men and women. The study also finds that gender differences exist in trait preference, especially for traits such as seed coat color, earliness, pod above canopy and indeterminate growth habit. As breeding programs focus on improving genetic gains for tolerance of biotic and abiotic stresses, equal attention must be given to breeding for traits desired by women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37899782
doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1260407
pmc: PMC10602653
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1260407Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Jinbaani, Owusu, Mohammed, Tengey, Mawunya, Kusi and Mohammed.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504
pubmed: 9117204
Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Dec 17;8(1):36-47
pubmed: 31993130
Plant J. 2017 Mar;89(5):1042-1054
pubmed: 27775877
Plants (Basel). 2022 Aug 09;11(16):
pubmed: 36015383
Nutrients. 2021 Mar 29;13(4):
pubmed: 33805305