Toward a translational team science hierarchy of needs: Exploring the information management challenges of team science.

Information behaviors clinical and translational research information management team science translational teams

Journal

Journal of clinical and translational science
ISSN: 2059-8661
Titre abrégé: J Clin Transl Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101689953

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 08 05 2023
revised: 07 07 2023
accepted: 04 08 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 30 10 2023
entrez: 30 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinical and Translational Research (CTR) requires a team-based approach, with successful teams engaging in skilled management and use of information. Yet we know little about the ways that Translational Teams (TTs) engage with information across the lifecycle of CTR projects. This qualitative study explored the challenges that information management imposes on the conduct of team-based CTR. We conducted interviews with ten members of TTs at University of Wisconsin. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted. TTs' piecemeal and reactive approaches to information management created conflict within the team and slowed scientific progress. The lack of cohesive information management strategies made it more difficult for teams to develop strong team processes like communication, scientific coordination, and project management. While TTs' research was hindered by the institutional challenges of interdisciplinary team information sharing, TTs who had developed shared approaches to information management that foregrounded transparency, accountability, and trust, described substantial benefits to their teamwork. We propose a new model for the Science of Team Science field - a Translational Team Science Hierarchy of Needs - that suggests interventions should be targeted at the appropriate stage of team development in order to maximize a team's scientific potential.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Clinical and Translational Research (CTR) requires a team-based approach, with successful teams engaging in skilled management and use of information. Yet we know little about the ways that Translational Teams (TTs) engage with information across the lifecycle of CTR projects. This qualitative study explored the challenges that information management imposes on the conduct of team-based CTR.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted interviews with ten members of TTs at University of Wisconsin. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted.
Results UNASSIGNED
TTs' piecemeal and reactive approaches to information management created conflict within the team and slowed scientific progress. The lack of cohesive information management strategies made it more difficult for teams to develop strong team processes like communication, scientific coordination, and project management. While TTs' research was hindered by the institutional challenges of interdisciplinary team information sharing, TTs who had developed shared approaches to information management that foregrounded transparency, accountability, and trust, described substantial benefits to their teamwork.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
We propose a new model for the Science of Team Science field - a Translational Team Science Hierarchy of Needs - that suggests interventions should be targeted at the appropriate stage of team development in order to maximize a team's scientific potential.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37900351
doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.614
pii: S2059866123006143
pmc: PMC10603362
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e210

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):535-46
pubmed: 19271807
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 10;4(4):286-293
pubmed: 33244408
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):292-314
pubmed: 21874133
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec 15;182(12):1033-8
pubmed: 26589709
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1629-1647
pubmed: 33982407
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9
pubmed: 17431139
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 16;5(1):e20
pubmed: 33948243
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 24;5(1):e23
pubmed: 33948246
Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1259-62
pubmed: 18845711
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Oct 21;5(1):e72
pubmed: 33948290
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(4):415-430
pubmed: 23483588
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 09;5(1):e198
pubmed: 34888067
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548
pubmed: 29792466

Auteurs

Patrick W Kelly (PW)

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Jason Chladek (J)

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Social and Administrative Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Betsy Rolland (B)

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Classifications MeSH