Situational Analysis of Healthcare and Medical Diagnostic Testing Facility Availability in Selected Blocks of Muzaffarpur District, Bihar, India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
accessibility
covid-19 management
diagnostic laboratory services
healthcare facility availability
situation analysis
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted:
26
09
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
30
10
2023
entrez:
30
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study presents a comprehensive assessment of healthcare facilities, focusing on workforce composition, operational dynamics, diagnostic laboratory services, and accessibility considerations. The comparison between government and private healthcare sectors provides insights into service delivery and potential disparities. The study's rationale, objectives, and methodology are explored in the context of the Indian healthcare landscape. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in Muzaffarpur district, Bihar, targeting selected urban and rural blocks. The study employed geolocation data to analyze accessibility to healthcare facilities. Data collection involved on-site visits, structured questionnaires, and consultation of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)'s framework. The assessment concentrated on the availability of tests offered by the LaBike platform, and workforce compositions were compared. Government healthcare facilities exhibited a balanced distribution of doctors, nurses, and grassroot workers, reflecting comprehensive healthcare provisions. Private facilities, although featuring moderate doctor and nurse presence, lacked grassroot workers. Diagnostic test prevalence was evident, with core tests, such as CBC and blood glucose, available in over 85% of facilities. Government facilities provided tests free of charge, while private facilities showcased a diverse cost spectrum. Proposed interventions received strong support from both sectors, indicating the potential for innovative healthcare solutions. Accessibility analysis: Urban intervention and control sites demonstrated comparable accessibility, with facilities located within 2 km. In rural intervention and control sites, distances varied significantly. Mushahari, a rural intervention site, required participants to travel 6 km to the nearest facility, impacting healthcare access. By contrast, Marwan, a rural control site, featured a shorter distance of 3 km. This study's comprehensive evaluation of healthcare facilities offers valuable insights into workforce dynamics, diagnostic services, and healthcare interventions in the context of government and private sectors. The findings underscore the significance of addressing workforce gaps and promoting equitable access to diagnostics. By informing evidence-based decision-making, this study contributes to the optimization of healthcare service delivery, aiming to enhance healthcare quality and accessibility for all.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37900506
doi: 10.7759/cureus.46037
pmc: PMC10603600
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e46037Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Kumar et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Sens Int. 2021;2:100117
pubmed: 34806053
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Mar 1;99(3):236-238
pubmed: 33716346
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 06;9(10):ofac526
pubmed: 36320192
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 31;7(3):e06639
pubmed: 33869857
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2018 Jul;33(3):304-313
pubmed: 30072830
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 05;15:454
pubmed: 26438342
Lancet. 2011 Feb 26;377(9767):760-8
pubmed: 21227489
Diagnostics (Basel). 2015 May 19;5(2):200-9
pubmed: 26854149
N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 5;369(23):2226-35
pubmed: 24304052