Transperineal Repair of Secondary Perineal Hernia Using a Mesh with a Memory-recoil Ring.

abdominoperineal resection hernia repair mesh with a memory-recoil ring perineal hernia

Journal

Journal of the anus, rectum and colon
ISSN: 2432-3853
Titre abrégé: J Anus Rectum Colon
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101718055

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 09 03 2023
accepted: 13 06 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 30 10 2023
entrez: 30 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transperineal repair of secondary perineal hernia (SPH) using a mesh with a memory-recoil ring. Seven patients with SPH who underwent transperineal repair (TPR) between July 2010 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. TPR was performed using a mesh with a memory-recoil ring. All SPHs developed after abdominoperineal resections in patients with anorectal malignancies. The median longitudinal and transverse diameters of the hernia orifice were 8 (7-10) cm and 6 (5-7) cm, respectively. In all cases, the mesh was fixed to the ischial tuberosity, residual levator muscle, coccygeus muscle, and coccyx after thorough dissection of the sac. The median operation time was 154 (142-280) min. Perioperative complications occurred in 2 cases (29%). One was enterotomy, which caused postoperative mesh infection requiring extraction of the mesh. The other was vaginal injury, which resulted in vaginal fistula but closed spontaneously. The median postoperative length of stay was 9 (5-14) days. No recurrence was observed during a median follow-up of 35 (9-151) months. TPR using a mesh with a memory-recoil ring is safe, feasible and promising technique for SPH repairs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37900698
doi: 10.23922/jarc.2023-011
pmc: PMC10600267
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

301-306

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Japan Society of Coloproctology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

Am Surg. 2010 May;76(5):474-9
pubmed: 20506875
Hernia. 2013 Aug;17(4):435-43
pubmed: 23657860
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;55:54-57
pubmed: 30690283
World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1710-5
pubmed: 20422186
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139
pubmed: 31250243
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 May 1;65(5):727-734
pubmed: 34907986
World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):2160-2167
pubmed: 28265736
Br J Surg. 2010 Apr;97(4):588-99
pubmed: 20186891
Front Surg. 2016 Sep 05;3:49
pubmed: 27656644
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;24(11):1285-1294
pubmed: 35712806
BMC Surg. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):19
pubmed: 28222776
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;14(7):e400-6
pubmed: 22308975
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Apr;17(4):351-5
pubmed: 25413255
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1129-39
pubmed: 25101610
Surgery. 2023 Feb;173(2):312-321
pubmed: 36404179
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):329-336
pubmed: 28508281

Auteurs

Katsuhito Suwa (K)

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Takanori Kurogochi (T)

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Takuro Ushigome (T)

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroya Enomoto (H)

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Tomoyoshi Okamoto (T)

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Ken Eto (K)

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH