Organic vs. conventional: impact of cultivation treatments on the soil microbiota in the vineyard.

environment microbiota organic soil vineyard wine

Journal

Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 18 06 2023
accepted: 27 09 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 30 10 2023
entrez: 30 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two vineyard management practices on the soil and its associated microbiota. The experiments were conducted in two adjacent plots, one completely organically managed and the other conventionally managed in terms of phytosanitary treatments but fertilized with organic amendments. The chemical soil analyses were correlated to the prokaryotic and fungal communities, which were studied using the metabarcoding technique. The main difference between the two treatments was a significantly higher amount of Cu in the organic managed vineyard soil, while conventional managed soil presented higher concentration of Na and Mg and was also associated with higher pH values. Despite these differences, no significant diversities were observed on soil biodiversity and microbial composition considering alpha and beta diversity metrics. However, the percentages of some phyla analyzed individually differed significantly between the two managements. Analyzing the metabolisms of these phyla, it was discovered an increment of species correlated to soils with higher organic matter content or land not used for agricultural purposes in the organic treated soil. The findings indicate that, despite the use of copper-based phytosanitary products, there was no degradation and loss of biodiversity in the organic soil microbial population compared to conventional management with the same type of fertilization, and the observed microbial population was more similar to that of natural soils.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37901804
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1242267
pmc: PMC10602642
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1242267

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Colautti, Civilini, Contin, Celotti and Iacumin.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Nov;11(11):789-99
pubmed: 24056930
Environ Pollut. 2007 Sep;149(1):10-7
pubmed: 17321651
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 7;9(1):14403
pubmed: 31591410
Microb Ecol. 2012 Aug;64(2):450-60
pubmed: 22419103
Ecol Appl. 2006 Oct;16(5):2011-21
pubmed: 17069391
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):4522-31
pubmed: 16820439
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 15;443:470-7
pubmed: 23220136
Front Microbiol. 2021 Dec 24;12:802213
pubmed: 35003032
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 7;111(1):5-6
pubmed: 24309378
ISME J. 2019 Jul;13(7):1722-1736
pubmed: 30850707
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Apr 1;48(1):1-13
pubmed: 19712426
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11512-9
pubmed: 18695234
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e97629
pubmed: 24933453
Nat Commun. 2015 Sep 02;6:8159
pubmed: 26328906
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 10;734:139434
pubmed: 32454337
J Sci Food Agric. 2013 Dec;93(15):3700-9
pubmed: 23633428
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D259-D264
pubmed: 30371820
Microbiome. 2019 Nov 8;7(1):140
pubmed: 31699155
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;577:84-93
pubmed: 27817923
Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1064-6
pubmed: 12004116
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0128183
pubmed: 26200112
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Oct;90(1):195-205
pubmed: 25046442
Chemosphere. 2016 Nov;162:293-307
pubmed: 27513550
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;83:103606
pubmed: 33545380
Plants (Basel). 2020 Nov 06;9(11):
pubmed: 33171888
Science. 2007 Jun 22;316(5832):1746-8
pubmed: 17588930
Mar Pollut Bull. 2022 Jan;174:113227
pubmed: 34883441
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Apr;25(12):12096-12106
pubmed: 29453723
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 25;797:148944
pubmed: 34298360
Science. 2016 Sep 16;353(6305):1272-7
pubmed: 27634532
mSphere. 2020 Aug 12;5(4):
pubmed: 32817452
mSphere. 2020 Nov 18;5(6):
pubmed: 33208514
Microbiologyopen. 2015 Jun;4(3):518-31
pubmed: 25922908
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011 Mar;75(1):133-91
pubmed: 21372322
ISME J. 2015 May;9(5):1177-94
pubmed: 25350160
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Dec;23(12):1057-1067
pubmed: 30287162
J Appl Ecol. 2011 Jun;48(3):543-550
pubmed: 21731110
F1000Res. 2018 Nov 1;7:1734
pubmed: 30613396
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017 Aug 4;55:565-589
pubmed: 28645232
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857
pubmed: 31341288
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jul;61(1):26-37
pubmed: 17442013
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 7;111(1):E139-48
pubmed: 24277822

Auteurs

Andrea Colautti (A)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Marcello Civilini (M)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Marco Contin (M)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Emilio Celotti (E)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Lucilla Iacumin (L)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Classifications MeSH