A Transdiagnostic Study of Effort-Cost Decision-Making in Psychotic and Mood Disorders.

effort-cost decision-making experimental psychopathology motivation reward processing schizophrenia transdiagnostic

Journal

Schizophrenia bulletin
ISSN: 1745-1701
Titre abrégé: Schizophr Bull
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0236760

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 30 10 2023
entrez: 30 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Research suggests that effort-cost decision-making (ECDM), the estimation of work required to obtain reward, may be a relevant framework for understanding motivational impairment in psychotic and mood pathology. Specifically, research has suggested that people with psychotic and mood pathology experience effort as more costly than controls, and thus pursue effortful goals less frequently. This study examined ECDM across psychotic and mood pathology. We hypothesized that patient groups would show reduced willingness to expend effort compared to controls. People with schizophrenia (N = 33), schizoaffective disorder (N = 28), bipolar disorder (N = 39), major depressive disorder (N = 40), and controls (N = 70) completed a physical ECDM task. Participants decided between completing a low-effort or high-effort option for small or larger rewards, respectively. Reward magnitude, reward probability, and effort magnitude varied trial-by-trial. Data were analyzed using standard and hierarchical logistic regression analyses to assess the subject-specific contribution of various factors to choice. Negative symptoms were measured with a clinician-rated interview. There was a significant effect of group, driven by reduced choice of high-effort options in schizophrenia. Hierarchical logistic regression revealed that reduced choice of high-effort options in schizophrenia was driven by weaker contributions of probability information. Use of reward information was inversely associated with motivational impairment in schizophrenia. Surprisingly, individuals with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder did not differ from controls. Our results provide support for ECDM deficits in schizophrenia. Additionally, differences between groups in ECDM suggest a seemingly similar behavioral phenotype, reduced motivation, could arise from disparate mechanisms.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Research suggests that effort-cost decision-making (ECDM), the estimation of work required to obtain reward, may be a relevant framework for understanding motivational impairment in psychotic and mood pathology. Specifically, research has suggested that people with psychotic and mood pathology experience effort as more costly than controls, and thus pursue effortful goals less frequently. This study examined ECDM across psychotic and mood pathology.
HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
We hypothesized that patient groups would show reduced willingness to expend effort compared to controls.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
People with schizophrenia (N = 33), schizoaffective disorder (N = 28), bipolar disorder (N = 39), major depressive disorder (N = 40), and controls (N = 70) completed a physical ECDM task. Participants decided between completing a low-effort or high-effort option for small or larger rewards, respectively. Reward magnitude, reward probability, and effort magnitude varied trial-by-trial. Data were analyzed using standard and hierarchical logistic regression analyses to assess the subject-specific contribution of various factors to choice. Negative symptoms were measured with a clinician-rated interview.
STUDY RESULTS RESULTS
There was a significant effect of group, driven by reduced choice of high-effort options in schizophrenia. Hierarchical logistic regression revealed that reduced choice of high-effort options in schizophrenia was driven by weaker contributions of probability information. Use of reward information was inversely associated with motivational impairment in schizophrenia. Surprisingly, individuals with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder did not differ from controls.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results provide support for ECDM deficits in schizophrenia. Additionally, differences between groups in ECDM suggest a seemingly similar behavioral phenotype, reduced motivation, could arise from disparate mechanisms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37901911
pii: 7333621
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad155
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH084821
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Adam J Culbreth (AJ)

Department of Psychiatry, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

Erin K Moran (EK)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, USA.

Wasita Mahaphanit (W)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA.

Molly A Erickson (MA)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Megan A Boudewyn (MA)

Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA.

Michael J Frank (MJ)

Department of Cognitive, Linguistics, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, USA.

Deanna M Barch (DM)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA.
Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA.

Angus W MacDonald (AW)

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

J Daniel Ragland (J)

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, USA.

Steven J Luck (SJ)

Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.

Steven M Silverstein (SM)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.

Cameron S Carter (CS)

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, USA.

James M Gold (JM)

Department of Psychiatry, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

Classifications MeSH