Dignity and the Importance of Acknowledgement of Personhood for People With Disability.
accessibility
acknowledgement
dignity
disability
human rights
inclusion
personhood
Journal
Qualitative health research
ISSN: 1049-7323
Titre abrégé: Qual Health Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9202144
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
pubmed:
30
10
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
entrez:
30
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Exploring the intricate relationship between individual and collective experiences, this study explores dignity from the perspectives of people with disability. Using an extreme citizen science approach, we engaged people with disability as active partners in gathering data through qualitative surveys and focus groups. Framework Analysis was employed to ensure the validity of findings while privileging the voices of people with lived experience of disability. Dignity was contingent on the acknowledgement of personhood and the delivery of human rights. Our research identified five key aspects to maintain and protect dignity: (1) acknowledging personhood; (2) recognising people with disability as decision-makers of their lives; (3) realising the right to access information; (4) maintaining the right to privacy; and (5) eliminating or minimising barriers to accessibility and inclusion. Undignified experiences that resulted from a lack of acknowledgement negatively affected participants' wellbeing, and healthcare settings were identified as particularly challenging environments for dignity. These findings have significant implications for healthcare systems and services within an international and interdisciplinary context. They emphasise the need for adaptable, flexible services, co-designed with people with lived experience of disability. Addressing organisational constraints, resource limitations, and expectations is paramount to ensuring dignity is maintained through the acknowledgement of personhood and safeguarding of human rights.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37902052
doi: 10.1177/10497323231204562
pmc: PMC10714705
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
141-153Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
BMJ. 2003 Dec 20;327(7429):1419-20
pubmed: 14684633
J Intellect Disabil. 2021 Dec;25(4):490-506
pubmed: 32167401
Indian J Med Res. 2015 Oct;142(4):355-8
pubmed: 26609024
Nurs Times. 2010 May 25-31;106(20):16-9
pubmed: 20552859
JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2253-60
pubmed: 11980525
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(2):228-37
pubmed: 18394035
Eur J Health Law. 2007 Nov;14(3):281-98
pubmed: 18348362
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009 Feb 24;9:3
pubmed: 19239684
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2011;17(2):141-54
pubmed: 23589988
Nurs Ethics. 2010 May;17(3):301-11
pubmed: 20444772
BMJ. 2007 Jul 28;335(7612):184-7
pubmed: 17656543
Psychother Res. 2009 Jul;19(4-5):583-90
pubmed: 20183407
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1774-1779
pubmed: 33058709
Health Care Anal. 2004 Jun;12(2):69-81; discussion 83-89
pubmed: 15487812
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 18;22(1):684
pubmed: 35982424
Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Dec;69(6):742-752
pubmed: 36369985
New Bioeth. 2015;21(1):87-97
pubmed: 29384347
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2751-8
pubmed: 26816090
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):104-115
pubmed: 31104584