Returning incidentally discovered Hepatitis C RNA-seq results to COPDGene study participants.
Journal
NPJ genomic medicine
ISSN: 2056-7944
Titre abrégé: NPJ Genom Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685193
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Oct 2023
31 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
27
03
2023
accepted:
10
10
2023
medline:
31
10
2023
pubmed:
31
10
2023
entrez:
31
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The consequences of returning infectious pathogen test results identified incidentally in research studies have not been well-studied. Concerns include identification of an important health issue for individuals, accuracy of research test results, public health impact, potential emotional distress for participants, and need for IRB permissions. Blood RNA-sequencing analysis for non-human RNA in 3984 participants from the COPDGene study identified 228 participants with evidence suggestive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We hypothesized that incidentally discovered HCV results could be effectively returned to COPDGene participants with attention to the identified concerns. In conjunction with a COPDGene Participant Advisory Panel, we developed and obtained IRB approval for a process of returning HCV research results and an HCV Follow-Up Study questionnaire to capture information about previous HCV diagnosis and treatment information and participant reactions to return of HCV results. During phone calls following the initial HCV notification letter, 84 of 124 participants who could be contacted (67.7%) volunteered that they had been previously diagnosed with HCV infection. Thirty-one of these 124 COPDGene participants were enrolled in the HCV Follow-Up Study. Five of the 31 HCV Follow-Up Study participants did not report a previous diagnosis of HCV. For four of these participants, subsequent clinical HCV testing confirmed HCV infection. Thus, 30/31 Follow-Up Study participants had confirmed HCV diagnoses, supporting the accuracy of the HCV research test results. However, the limited number of participants in the Follow-Up Study precludes an accurate assessment of the false-positive and false-negative rates of the research RNA sequencing evidence for HCV. Most HCV Follow-Up Study participants (29/31) were supportive of returning HCV research results, and most participants found the process for returning HCV results to be informative and not upsetting. Newly diagnosed participants were more likely to be pleased to learn about a potentially curable infection (p = 0.027) and showed a trend toward being more frightened by the potential health risks of HCV (p = 0.11). We conclude that HCV results identified incidentally during transcriptomic research studies can be successfully returned to research study participants with a carefully designed process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37903807
doi: 10.1038/s41525-023-00379-4
pii: 10.1038/s41525-023-00379-4
pmc: PMC10616181
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
36Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089897
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089856
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089897
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089897
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089856
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL089897
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(8):1402-1405
pubmed: 30239645
Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Oct;49(2):291-4
pubmed: 23769171
Fla Law Rev. 2019 Sep;71(5):1281-1345
pubmed: 34305361
Hepatology. 2012 Jun;55(6):1652-61
pubmed: 22213025
Georgetown Law J. 2014;102:795-843
pubmed: 25346543
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):1357
pubmed: 36693932
Vox Sang. 2009 Jan;96(1):20-8
pubmed: 19121194
COPD. 2012 Aug;9(5):466-72
pubmed: 22676387
Hepatology. 2019 Mar;69(3):1020-1031
pubmed: 30398671
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(2):1-17
pubmed: 32271723
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Dec;46(12):1341-1347
pubmed: 30017311
Genet Med. 2019 Jul;21(7):1541-1547
pubmed: 30467403
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57 Suppl 2:S51-5
pubmed: 23884066
Lancet. 2019 Apr 6;393(10179):1453-1464
pubmed: 30765123
Transfus Med. 2015 Dec;25(6):358-65
pubmed: 26707828
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):763-765
pubmed: 32074427
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;52(7):641-647
pubmed: 28590325
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Aug 17;61(RR-4):1-32
pubmed: 22895429
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 4;163(3):215-23
pubmed: 26120969
COPD. 2010 Feb;7(1):32-43
pubmed: 20214461
J Infect Dis. 2006 Jul 1;194(1):11-9
pubmed: 16741877
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):668-676
pubmed: 31412182
Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 15;34(24):4287-4289
pubmed: 29982281
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):216-8
pubmed: 18547190
Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):249-255
pubmed: 27854360